I’ve read for quite a while that Tucker Carlson and his anti-Israel wing have a lot of influence on Trump.
I never thought that was the case. It has always seemed to me that Trump’s approval of Israel, although not kneejerk and automatic, is nevertheless solid.
So this seems correct to me – Carlson didn’t “lose” Trump; he never had him:
The other big loser in this struggle is a “woke right” faction of the conservative movement in the United States that opposes Israel and has been fervently opposed to any action to stop Iran from gaining nuclear weapons. More to the point, this rag-tag group of talk-show hosts, right-wing influencers and social-media gurus who can’t seem to mention Israel without betraying their antisemitic tendencies has lost President Donald Trump.
Or to be more precise, they never really had him. …
The most prominent of these voices on the right is former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, whose shows and posts on the X platform reach many millions of people. As I’ve noted previously, Carlson is adamant about his distaste for Israel and his willingness to shill for the Iranian regime as well as its ally Qatar. …
As polls have consistently shown, Republicans and conservatives overwhelmingly support Israel, even as Democrats and the political left have abandoned it. Yet Carlson and his woke right acolytes, imitators and supporters are certain that Trump will lose his MAGA supporters if he continues to support Israel and doesn’t pursue a policy of appeasing Iran. However, as Trump said in an interview in The Atlantic, he’s the one who decides how to define “America First,” not Carlson and the trolls he platforms or plays to via the Internet.
What’s up with Carlson? Perhaps he’s getting money from those sources, which would be the simplest explanation. But I don’t think that’s it. I think his anti-Israel stance is both a niche position that gets him a following and a lot of clicks from a certain segment of the right and distinguishes him as the star of that group, and a natural continuation of positions he’s always held.
I’ve never been a big TV news watcher, but there was a time many years ago when I did watch it with at least some regularity. I haven’t watched it for years, but I stopped watching Carlson long before I stopped the rest of it. The reason was that he was terrible on foreign policy questions. Here’s what I wrote about Carlson in September of 2024, and it represents what I’d been thinking for many years:
… I got to the point long ago of not being able to stomach Carlson or his guests when they talk about anything foreign-policy related. I long ago decided he was basically Pat Buchanan on steroids, and although I suppose now and then Carlson gets something right (particularly if he’s talking about domestic issues), on foreign affairs he’s been spending a great deal of time giving a platform to people who are wrong. And it’s a big platform because he has a huge following.
Carlson basically represents the views one can often see at The American Conservative, which is a publication founded by Buchanan himself in 2002. Just as an example of what I mean, today the American Conservative website highlighted this article entitled “Zionism Is Not an American Principle: It is time to put some daylight between American policy and Israeli actions.” Here’s an excerpt, to give you an idea of some of the flavor:
In the short term, President Donald Trump must resist entrapment in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s war of choice, continue to make (likely futile) attempts at negotiations, and defend the safety of U.S. soldiers caught in the middle—preferably by funneling them out of the region entirely. In the bigger picture, the United States must begin the process of separating fervent Zionism from its policymaking institutions.
War of choice. The author elucidates what he means:
Israel’s behavior is anathema to any kind of morality or human decency. From its numerous wars of aggression and territorial expansion, to its racialist laws, to the forced expulsion of hundreds of thousands of people from their ancestral homes and their continued debasement under a brutal military occupation (which has lasted longer than the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe), to its war of annihilation on Gaza, including the purposeful targeting of civilians and children—this is not a government that can be reasoned with.
There it is: the complete leftist line merged with the acceptance of Hamas propaganda. “Conservative”? Hardly. The principles involved are these: (1) anything that anyone we call “neocon” is in favor of, we oppose (2) Jews are neocons; neocons are Jews (3) therefore Israel is the worst of all.
You can see American Conservative’s coverage of Tucker Carlson here; it seems to be a love fest.
Trump is a good deal less enamored:
“Well, considering that I’m the one that developed ‘America First,’ and considering that the term wasn’t used until I came along, I think I’m the one that decides that,” Trump told Scherer. “For those people who say they want peace — you can’t have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon. So for all of those wonderful people who don’t want to do anything about Iran having a nuclear weapon—that’s not peace.”
Trump also referred to Carlson on Truth Social as “kooky.” I’d say that’s being kind – as well as retro.