↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 1256 << 1 2 … 1,254 1,255 1,256 1,257 1,258 … 1,934 1,935 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Give me your tired, your poor, your unaccompanied children

The New Neo Posted on June 9, 2014 by neoJune 9, 2014

While we were busy talking about plenty of other things (whack-a-mole, anyone?), the illegal immigration situation in this country seem to have gone from dreadful to utter chaos, with no end in sight.

This is absolutely disturbing on so many levels it’s hard to process. Also, as a side issue, are Jan Brewer and Arizona being punished by the Obama administration?:

Hundreds of migrants nabbed by the border patrol after illegally crossing the US-Mexico border through Texas have been flown to Arizona and left at Greyhound Bus stations in Tucson and Phoenix during the past month…Critics charge that released border-crossers will vanish into the woodwork. Immigrant advocates accuse the federal government of releasing migrants without providing enough basic necessities such as food and water on days that hover around 100 degrees F.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R) calls it “another disturbing example of a deliberate failure to enforce border security policies and repair a broken immigration system” in a letter to President Obama.

Yeah, a letter! That’ll do it. Although to be honest, I don’t know what the remedy would be. Even impeachment wouldn’t do it at this point, because fixing this would require that both parties be dedicated to tightening both border security and lessening the cornucopia of services available to illegal immigrants, which would require some harsh and extremely difficult decisions that I don’t think our politicians are up to.

Meanwhile, things have been getting worse. In the last couple of weeks or so I had read a couple of articles about how more children have been crossing the border alone. The articles explained that they are fleeing political and social turmoil in their countries of birth, but none that I read managed to point out the obvious, which is that people are sending children here because they perceive them as being less likely to be deported than in the past, and if the parents follow, they too will be unlikely to be deported because of policies that favor family unification (here’s a typical article of this type, from the NY Times of May 17). The Christian Science Monitor article I linked to at the beginning of this post was the first one I had seen that alludes to the Obama administration’s policies as at least a partial explanation of what’s been happening.

The CS Monitor offers more background here on why the number of illegal child immigrants has increased in the last two years:

At issue is Mr. Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which in 2012 allowed some undocumented immigrants who came to America as minors to defer deportation for two years. Last week, the administration announced guidelines for how these immigrants could defer deportation for a further two years.

DACA would not apply to anyone coming across the border today. Only undocumented immigrants who were brought to the US as minors before June 15, 2007, are eligible. But to Republican critics, DACA created the opportunity for misinformation and confusion.

“Word has gotten out around the world about President Obama’s lax immigration enforcement policies and it has encouraged more individuals to come to the United States illegally,” said Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R) of Virginia, a key broker in immigration reform efforts on Capitol Hill, in a statement last week…

During the decade preceding fiscal year 2012, the federal government agency tasked with caring for unaccompanied minors who cross the border illegally dealt with an average of 7,000 to 8,000 cases a year, according to a Department of Health and Human Services fact sheet. In fiscal year 2011, the number was 6,560.

The following year, however, the number jumped to 13,625. This fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30, 2014, federal officials are estimating that the number could be 80,000, according to an internal memo cited by The New York Times.

Obama called the situation a “humanitarian crisis” Monday. Poverty and violence are driving the migration, administration officials say, and activists working with migrants agree. But some also suggest that DACA could be a factor.

Ya think?

That article goes on to say that Obama is being pressured by his base to stop deportations of illegals altogether. As a pro-immigrant San Francisco crowd yelled to him last November: “”Stop deportations! Yes we can!” And why not? Obama makes the laws and he also breaks the laws at his pleasure, so the crowd was well within its rights to think Obama could and would do it. Obama needs his base (which includes Hispanics/Latinos) to come out in force for Democrats in 2014 or he could lose the Senate, so his motivation to please them is very strong (although he was already motivated to allow as many illegal immigrants—and potential Democratic voters—as possible to come into this country). It’s no accident, either, that Obama announced DACA in 2012, a presidential election year.

The CS Monitor seems to be the mainstream paper covering these issues in the most depth. Here’s another article from them about it, which mentions the fact that most of the children coming across the border alone are boys over twelve.

One small ray of sunshine in an otherwise very gloomy situation is that the increasing phenomenon of child illegal immigrants might help convince people that the border is nowhere near as secure as Obama says it is. In turn, this could discourage Republicans in Congress from caving on immigration/amnesty. As Jan Brewer said, ““If the Obama administration put half the effort into securing our border as it has invested to institute this operation, our state and nation would not be facing this situation.”

More:

Nora Griselda Bercian Diaz, a mother from Guatemala who crossed into the U.S. illegally with her 6-year-old daughter, told local media outlet KRGV that the message being spread in her home country is, “Go to America with your child, you won’t be turned away.”

Bercian Diaz said she thought the U.S. border was open to all families. She added that news reports are circulating in her country which state that mothers and children are obtaining bus tickets.

And once they come they need not only food and water and housing, but they need lawyers to fight deportation. So here’s some money for the lawyers.

Obama’s reaction to all of this is to ask for even more money to help the illegal immigrants once they’re here. And there is little question that their plight is indeed very troubling and pathetic at this point, because the numbers have overwhelmed whatever system was already in place. But the truth is that incentivizing a behavior increases it, and this is what Obama has been doing right along. His response to this new crisis is to incentivize the behavior even more.

[NOTE: I agree with this article, but I do not agree that Democrats were unaware of the incentivizing effect of amnesty. They are well aware, and for them it’s a feature rather than a bug.]

Posted in Latin America, Law, Obama | 29 Replies

Computer passes Turing test

The New Neo Posted on June 9, 2014 by neoJune 9, 2014

My guess is that the computer managed to pass the Turing test not so much because computers are getting so smart and lifelike as because people are getting so dumb and computer-program-like.

Posted in Science | 8 Replies

Those five Taliban? Why, they’re just pussycats…

The New Neo Posted on June 8, 2014 by neoJune 8, 2014

…according to the LA Times.

They’re really moderates, you see. And they’re old, very very old (43-47).

All that shouting and cheering you hear from the Taliban in Afghanistan at their release? They’re just happy to see that the old guys will get a little breath of freedom before they’re put out to pasture.

We also know that being in prison for twelve years usually cures people of whatever hatred ails them. That’s true of most prisoners who are in for violent crimes, and for jihadis. Especially for jihadis, actually, whose worldviews are so brittle they’re among the easiest to “turn.”

The LA Times also has a bridge in Brooklyn it wants to sell you. One in San Francisco too, orange-colored. Actually, many many bridges, all going very cheap. You can pay in three easy installments, and they will throw in a blender…

But enough silly-fun. No matter how low you think the press has become, you have to adjust your opinion of them still lower. A couple of days has given them a chance to regroup and find their bearings after being thrown by Obama’s egregious and outrageous prisoner swap, and the narrative is emerging: Bergdahl is an unfairly maligned soldier who served with honor. He was a prisoner of war in Afghanistan. Republicans favored the trade Obama was to make before they criticized it. Their criticism reflects their hatred of the president and their reflexive disapproval of everything he does. And the Taliban Five are just kindly old grandpas.

[NOTE: Thomas Joscelyn at the Weekly Standard applies a corrective to the LA Times’ article:

All five of the released Taliban leaders were deemed “high” risks to the U.S., its interests, and its allies by Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO). President Obama’s own Guantanamo Review Task Force evaluated the five and concluded that they should be held indefinitely under the laws of war. There was bipartisan resistance in Washington, including from leading Senate Democrats, to releasing the five, because of the dangers they pose. There was also significant opposition within the U.S. military and intelligence community to releasing them. Tellingly, these are the five jihadist leaders the Taliban wanted back the most and the Taliban celebrated their release, saying that the release of its “five senior leaders” from U.S. custody brought “tears of joy.”

Read the whole thing, and realize just how debased the Times has become. There is literally nothing they will not say to defend Obama.

Also, it appears that the article was written mainly by two stringers, “Times staff writer Bengali reported from Mumbai, India, and special correspondent Baktash from Kabul.” “Baktash” appears to be Hashmat Baktash, who’s been writing for the Times since 2010. I can’t find out much more about Baktash (those of you who are members of LinkedIn probably can), but he seems to have graduated from high school in 2004, which would probably make him about 28 now, and 16 years old when the Taliban Five were first incarcerated in Guantanamo. I’ve noticed a tendency for MSM newspapers to use a lot of stringers and young people in their reporting, which I’m sure saves them money.]

[ADDENDUM: Scott Johnson at Powerline points out a New York Post article detailing Obama’s plans to use the idea that Gitmo prisoners have “reformed” in order to justify their releases:

One al Qaeda suspect captured in Afghanistan is considered reformed because he took up yoga and read a biography of the Dalai Lama. Another is eligible for release because of his “positive attitude.”

And one longtime detainee, a former bodyguard for Osama bin Laden, is now harmless because he’s going to start a “milk and honey farm.”

The Periodic Review Board already helped clear 78 of the remaining 149 prisoners for release, documents show, and has scheduled more hearings for this summer.

It is no surprise to learn that these plans are in the works. I would expect nothing less of Obama.]

[ADDENDUM II: Thinking about it, I have a gut feeling that this “the prisoners are virtually harmless” approach could be effective if the MSM gets behind it. And indications are that the MSM will get behind it.

I watched how Benghazi was defanged in various ways, and that was very effective. If these five guys don’t march into Times Square and detonate an atom bomb, the evil they do will occur far away and not be directly or immediately connected to anything here, sort of like Vietnam after our withdrawal of funds in the mid-70s. Out of sight, out of mind.

If more military personnel are kidnapped (and they may not be), Obama can just exchange more Gitmo prisoners for the hostages. Gitmo has been so demonized that many people will applaud its closing. A great many people in the US are so tired of hearing about war and terrorists that they’ll be only too happy to get them off the front page. Unless something big happens here again, which the terrorists may be too smart to try, the US would really like to be a giant that just goes back to sleep.

Apologies for my pessimism. I hope I’m wrong.]

Posted in Press, Terrorism and terrorists | 40 Replies

Top dog?

The New Neo Posted on June 7, 2014 by neoJune 7, 2014

Britain’s biggest, anyway:

bigdog

Okay, okay, there’s a bit of a trick angle there to accentuate Freddy’s gargantuousity (and yeah, I know it’s not a real word). But here’s one that isn’t a trick, and he’s still plenty big:

bigdog2

Great Danes don’t tend to live all that long, by the way. But long enough to eat their owners out of house and home.

And to all you dog-lovers: don’t attack me, I like dogs.

Posted in Nature | 19 Replies

I guess “plus size” now means positive integers rather than zero or negative ones

The New Neo Posted on June 7, 2014 by neoNovember 10, 2014

“Curvy” models unite, you have nothing to lose [emphasis mine]:

Inga Eiriksdottir began modeling in her native Iceland when she was just 14 years old. But as her body changed, the modeling industry didn’t change along with her. Although she had appeared in campaigns for brands like Dolce & Gabbana and Max Mara and had worked with esteemed fashion photographers including Patrick Demarchelier and Steven Meisel, her agency, Ford Models, switched her over to its plus-size division when she was 21 years old. The 5’10” Eiriksdottir was a size 6 at the time…

For those of you guys who don’t know what a size 6 is, it’s very very tiny. And to be a size 6 at a height of 5’10” is to be a really skinny person.

I assume Eiriksdottir (LOVE those Icelandic names!) is now a bit bigger than a 6. But only a bit. She’s 30 now, and here’s a more recent pic of the barely-zaftig Inga:

inga

And here’s a video of another plus-size model, who’s not exactly going to break any chairs when she sits down. Who says I don’t give you some cheesecake now and then?

Personally, I think part of the current rise of the plus-size model has to do with the success of the TV show “Mad Men” and its un-thin star (I refuse to call her fat, because she’s not) Christina Hendricks.

Posted in Fashion and beauty | 16 Replies

They were for Bergdahl before they were against him: those terrible GOP flip-floppers

The New Neo Posted on June 7, 2014 by neoJune 8, 2014

Expect to read a lot more articles like this one in your friendly neighborhood MSM, entitled “The Bergdahl boomerang: GOP lawmakers who long urged a rescue now sour on the idea.”

The article isn’t quite as lopsided as the headline would suggest. For example, it has a few passages that take into account the fact that the actual Bergdahl deal featured some circumstances the GOP hadn’t bargained for, and that some Democrats are upset and changed their minds too. But the piece is obviously meant to stir readers who are Democrat loyals to have sentiments exactly like this one in the comments section, first in line when I happened to look just now: “It’s the same old story; the GOP supports something until Obama does it, then they oppose it.”

This is the line that the MSM has agreed would work best as an approach to the Bergdahl release, that and the one that goes something like “Republicans are attacking a soldier, so they’re hypocrites when they say they care about the military.”

When the Bergdahl deal first broke, the MSM was as blindsided as everyone else and their first reactions were more honest and more critical of the administration. Oops! Now that they’ve had time to stop, digest, regroup, confer, and get their talking points straight, they’re more united on the themes they think will be most effective in deflecting criticism from Obama and reflect most poorly on Republicans.

I don’t think most of you need reminding, but these are just some of the things that changed between the time politicans were supporting some sort of deal for Bergdahl and the time the details of the actual deal came out:

(1) Much more about Bergdahl’s desertion (not to say possible defection) has come out, proving that he walked away willingly, and knowingly put his comrades at risk in searching for him.

(2) The identities of the prisoners in the exchange, five of the worst detainees at Gitmo, if not the worst.

(3) The security arrangements for those prisoners after their release—that is, practically none, or laughable ones.

(4) Obama’s flouting of the laws that govern notice to Congress when releasing Guantanamo prisoners.

(5) Obama’s ignoring the counsel of military and intelligence experts on the dangers of this move.

Have I left anything out? It’s as though a person has agreed that getting a nice new car would be awfully nice, and then when the car is delivered he discovers that (a) it’s a lemon, and the seller knew it’s a lemon; (b) it has a bomb attached to it that will go off when the ignition is started; and (c) he will have to pay the seller a billion dollars. The person receiving the car might even respond by flip-flopping and say hey, wait a minute, I don’t really want that car after all, if that’s the deal I have to accept to get it.

But it would be too late; the deed was done without consulting him. And then it’s time to call him a hypocrite.

Posted in Politics, Press | 12 Replies

Catholic priests and sexual abuse rates

The New Neo Posted on June 7, 2014 by neoJune 7, 2014

Let me make this clear at the outset: one case of child sexual abuse by a Catholic priest would be one too many. Priests and all other clergy are in a very special position of both trust and power that makes the betrayal of children under their wing especially heinous.

However, there’s nothing special about the Catholic clergy in terms of their incidence of abuse, at least so far as we can tell. Perhaps the most special thing is that people can blame whatever abuse has occurred by priests on their vows of celibacy, although if it’s correct that rates of abuse by Catholic clergy versus rates of abuse by clergy of other denominations do not differ, then it’s illogical to think that celibacy has anything to do with the phenomenon among priests. What might be most “special” about the Catholic Church versus others is that the Catholic hierarchy is more obvious and attempts to deal with abuse have been more visible.

If you don’t believe me about the statistics, take a good look at this, this, this, this, and this.

You can find tons more articles in that same vein. But I have yet to see a single one that offers any evidence to the contrary, although I can’t say I’ve spent countless hours researching this. And yet, “everybody knows” that priests have an especially high rate of abuse, right?

Posted in Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex, Religion | 17 Replies

The rogue Obama

The New Neo Posted on June 7, 2014 by neoJune 7, 2014

Having observed Obama just about every day now for at least six years, I’ve come to some firm conclusions. And here’s a quote with which I concur [hat tip: Artfldgr]:

But to Obama and his core supporters, he’s not a rogue. To them, he’s a principled man achieving what he set out to achieve. It’s all about ends and means. Not all ends are worth all means in the radical’s book, but some ends are worth any means to achieve them. From the day that Obama sought his first public office in the Illinois Senate, representing that sliver of east Cook County bordering Indiana, through his carefully planned Senate campaign, to his presidency, his means are fluid, but his ends are unshakeable.

Radical leftists don’t give thought to what the “enemy” thinks about what they say (Rule #12). They only think about what those they wish to convince to their cause believe…

Obama ignores public opinion polls for the most part. Unlike previous Democrat presidents like Bill Clinton, he has no desire to be liked. The adoration of his core supporters means power to him, people who will do what he needs done. Personal loyalty is earned by commitment to the cause, and that loyalty is just as easily lost.

That coldness about other people, the viewing of them as merely a means to an end, useful or not useful for his purposes, is one of Obama’s most salient characteristics. In fact, it was clearly present in his very first political act at the beginning of his very first political campaign at the local Chicago level, the behavior that should have given everyone the willies but somehow didn’t: his treatment of Alice Palmer. Jokes about Obama’s throwing people under the bus aren’t really all that funny, because of what they imply about his ruthlessness. That’s why it’s always puzzled me that people perceive him as affable or likeable. It’s an impression I’ve never gotten, and that’s on a visceral level (boy, I’ve been using that word “visceral” a lot lately) as well as an intellectual one.

What are Obama’s purposes? His own self-aggrandizement, for one, but he’s so convinced of his marvelousness that, as the quote indicates, he doesn’t really need people to love him or even like him. He has plenty who adore him, and he adores himself. What he needs is power for its own sake, plus power in the service of the leftist agenda which he definitely espouses. That agenda is composed of, but hardly limited to: reducing America’s status and power in the world, helping third-world countries gain more power (including, if necessary, Islamist fundamentalist third-world countries), making people in this country more dependent on big government and therefore on the Democratic Party, taking from the rich to give to the poor. His favorite tactics include Alinsky’s rules, harming his opponents, smearing his opponents, lying, fostering envy and hatred between races and classes, and expanding executive power to get around limitations placed on him by the Constitution. This is what makes him seem “rogue” at this point to a lot of people, but he’s only “rogue” if you look at him in terms of conventional presidents. If you look at him in terms of tyrants, he’s not rogue at all.

[NOTE: The word “rogue” has two general meanings. The first is a person who is dishonest or immoral. I guess Obama fits that bill. The second meaning is a person “who causes trouble in a playful way.” I see nothing playful about Obama, although I suppose he’s “playful” in the sense of playing the long game.]

[NOTE II: This is slightly off-topic, but it’s a good article about something I’ve written on many times in the last few years, the makeup and background of Obama’s security advisors, who are politically-oriented PR hacks.]

Posted in Obama, Politics | 56 Replies

Don’t overdo the running

The New Neo Posted on June 6, 2014 by neoJune 6, 2014

Apparently, a little running goes a long way.

I don’t like to run, anyway. I like to walk fast.

Posted in Health | 21 Replies

The Obama administration…

The New Neo Posted on June 6, 2014 by neoJune 6, 2014

…pisses on Democrats in Congress and tells them it’s raining:

But the administration had a way to go to placate Democrats, some of whom said senators were not soothed on Tuesday by an appearance by Dennis McDonough, the White House chief of staff, at a private weekly party lunch. Mr. McDonough, people familiar with the meeting said, told lawmakers that the administration had been in touch with officials on Capitol Hill before the prisoner exchange, when nearly all of those in the luncheon had not been consulted, including Ms. Feinstein…

I think one of the worst defenses the White House has tried out is that they didn’t trust Congress not to leak, and the Taliban had threatened to kill Bergdahl if the information got out. And yet these were the same Congressional leaders whom they had told about the Bin Laden operation months in advance.

The lie is so transparent it is absurd (why would the Taliban care?), and it is profoundly insulting to Congress, including prominent members of Obama’s own party. Nor does it explain why Obama couldn’t have given them a heads-up a few minutes before he made his announcement, at the very least.

The reason they were not told is crystal clear: they would have objected vociferously, and Obama couldn’t risk that.

Posted in Politics, Terrorism and terrorists | 45 Replies

I was wondering…

The New Neo Posted on June 6, 2014 by neoJune 6, 2014

…whether anyone who served with Bergdahl in Afghanistan is defending him.

The answer appears to be “no”:

To date, not a single member of Bergdahl’s platoon has come forward to say that he was a loyal solider who was captured while he was doing his duties.

I bet they’ll manage to find one and trot him/her out, though. And somehow that will invalidate the unanimity of the others.

[NOTE: Here’s a pretty good summary of the Bergdahl incident so far.]

Posted in Middle East, Obama | 11 Replies

The Bergdahl exchange defense emerges

The New Neo Posted on June 6, 2014 by neoJune 6, 2014

The best defense is a good offense, and after a couple of days of initial scrambling the administration and its defenders have fastened on their approach to defending Obama on Bergdahl.

It consists of the following:

(1) Trying various lies on for size: we did it for this reason; no, we did it for this reason; well, actually, it was for this reason…

(2) How dare you slander/libel Bergdahl this way, a brave fighting man who has suffered greatly? You must hate our troops, unlike President Obama.

(3) Those who served with Bergdahl and are criticizing him are “swiftboating” him unfairly, just as the Swift Vets did to Kerry (who is now Secretary of State, by the way, in an interesting historical harmony). This charge of “swiftboating” has the effect of simultaneously dissing Bergdahl’s former colleagues in the military and Kerry’s as liars.

(4) You are flip-floppers! Why, some of you have changed your minds! This ignores the fact that a person could have been in favor of a Bergdahl rescue deal without being the least bit in favor of this Bergdahl rescue deal, so much worse than anyone previously had contemplated.

(5) There’s plenty of precedent for exchanging prisoners of war, and that’s all this was. This ignores the fact that there is absolutely no precedent for giving up five enemy combatant prisoners of this magnitude to obtain a hostage—not a prisoner-of-war—who went AWOL, deserted, or defected voluntarily to the enemy. Especially when hostilities are still ongoing.

The sad thing, the very sad thing, is that these sorts of approaches have worked in the past, and they may work now.

Posted in Military, Politics | 16 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Art Deco on This type of ed is special, all right
  • Xylourgos on Open thread 11/10/2026
  • AesopFan on Trump says his deportation program might have been too tough
  • AesopFan on This type of ed is special, all right
  • AesopFan on Trump says his deportation program might have been too tough

Recent Posts

  • The refinery issue
  • This type of ed is special, all right
  • Open thread 11/10/2026
  • Trump says his deportation program might have been too tough
  • Worldwide “anti-Zionism” – trolls and others

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (330)
  • Afghanistan (98)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (164)
  • Best of neo-neocon (91)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (599)
  • Dance (292)
  • Disaster (244)
  • Education (329)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (566)
  • Election 2018 (33)
  • Election 2020 (514)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (125)
  • Election 2028 (14)
  • Evil (130)
  • Fashion and beauty (324)
  • Finance and economics (1,054)
  • Food (319)
  • Friendship (48)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (737)
  • Health (1,169)
  • Health care reform (546)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (338)
  • History (719)
  • Immigration (452)
  • Iran (467)
  • Iraq (227)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (836)
  • Jews (445)
  • Language and grammar (365)
  • Latin America (216)
  • Law (2,997)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (125)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,335)
  • Liberty (1,119)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (394)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,523)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (935)
  • Middle East (385)
  • Military (327)
  • Movies (355)
  • Music (534)
  • Nature (262)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (185)
  • Obama (1,740)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (132)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,051)
  • Poetry (259)
  • Political changers (179)
  • Politics (2,797)
  • Pop culture (397)
  • Press (1,636)
  • Race and racism (885)
  • Religion (431)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (642)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (983)
  • Theater and TV (266)
  • Therapy (71)
  • Trump (1,638)
  • Uncategorized (4,634)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,465)
  • War and Peace (1,035)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑