↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 1078 << 1 2 … 1,076 1,077 1,078 1,079 1,080 … 1,934 1,935 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

How’s the blog speed for you?

The New Neo Posted on March 17, 2016 by neoMarch 17, 2016

It’s pretty good for me right now.

Of course, I don’t want to jinx the blog by saying that. But it’s pretty much back to normal for me—for now.

Let me know if things get bad again. I don’t really know what happened to cause the slowdown or to reverse it, but the problem seemed to coincide with a massive spam influx, to the tune of at least a thousand a day and probably more.

However, one longtime commenter is reporting the new comments are not showing up for him, no matter what browser he uses. He says that the post indicates the number of comments, but when he tries to look at them they don’t appear. Anyone else having that problem?

Posted in Blogging and bloggers | 16 Replies

Lindsay Graham and Rubio speak up for Cruz

The New Neo Posted on March 17, 2016 by neoMarch 17, 2016

It’s rather a “pigs fly” moment:

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham has thrown his support to Ted Cruz, calling him “the best alternative” to Donald Trump.

According to an invitation obtained by POLITICO, Graham will headline a fundraiser for Cruz on Monday.

This marks the second senator to publicly support Cruz, and is a significant development: Graham, a more centrist South Carolina senator, until recently openly detested his colleague from Texas. But in recent weeks he has suggested that Cruz stands the best chance of beating Donald Trump.

Now I realize a number of things. The first is that Trump supporters will almost certainly say that this proves that Cruz is some sort of RINO and “establishment” guy, because Graham is a RINO and an establishment guy. Well, Cruz is definitely no RINO and the establishment (and Graham) has until recently detested him. Until recently, they also had an alternative candidate more in line with their point of view, who had a chance of winning (Rubio). But now that only Kasich is left and Kasich has no chance of the nomination, it makes perfect sense for someone like Graham to throw his support to the conservative anti-Trump left standing, the formerly hated and maligned Ted Cruz Who Is Not a RINO.

Previously, anti-Cruz pundits and commenters have been pleased to point out that Cruz has little overt support from his fellow-senators. Now that he’s getting at least a little support, no doubt they’ll say that it means he’s in too tight with them and will be their puppet.

As far as hypocrisy goes—yes, politics makes strange bedfellows. But I see this Graham endorsement as qualitatively different than Carson’s of Trump. Carson had various alternatives from which to choose: Trump, Cruz, Kasich, or Rubio. He chose Trump from that entire field despite the fact that Trump had questioned his religion and called him pathological and something like a child molester in the recalcitrance of his pathology. Cruz would have been the natural alternative for Carson, and Cruz is still very much in the game, but Carson seems to hold the behavior of Cruz’s people in Iowa against Cruz more than he holds the behavior of Trump himself against him (plus Trump seems to have promised Carson something).

Marco Rubio hasn’t made a formal endorsement of Cruz, but has pretty much come out with an informal one:

Former presidential candidate Marco Rubio told a group of Minnesota supporters Wednesday he is hoping one of the remaining candidates for president will stop Donald Trump from winning the Republican nomination ”” and that Texas Sen. Ted Cruz could be the best option for conservatives…

He said he saw no real path forward for his campaign after losing Florida and its 99 winner-take-all delegates. He acknowledged he could have stayed in the race with the intention of seeking the nomination at the convention, but said he would have had to run a shoestring campaign with no money to defend himself on the airwaves. Even if he had won the nomination against the odds, Rubio said, the victory could prove pyrrhic.

“Winning a general election with a nominee that a significant percentage of the base thinks stole it, even though you did it through the rules of the RNC, would be pretty much fatal for the party,” Rubio said, though he added that many Republicans will not vote for Trump, either.

As I’ve said many times before, Rubio should have dropped out after March 1. I believe I understand why he didn’t, but I am firmly of the opinion that it was the wrong, wrong, wrong decision. I also wonder whether Cruz has promised Rubio something. I don’t think so, but it’s certainly possible.

Will any of this matter? We’ve got Arizona and Utah coming up, then Wisconsin, New York, Connecticut, Delaware…well, see for yourself. It will be especially interesting to see what happens in the first couple of states that vote post-Rubio-dropout. I make no predictions on that.

But I do have a caveat. I find it extremely annoying when people take the results of a GOP primary and extrapolate them to the general election in a state that doesn’t ordinarily vote GOP. For example, Kasich winning Ohio in the GOP primary does not tell you how Kasich would fare in the state in a general against Hillary Clinton, although it certainly tells you something about the strength of his support among people who voted in the Republican primary (for example, although he won he didn’t even get a majority of them). Likewise, whoever wins the GOP primary in a state like NY, which tends to go strongly blue in the general, doesn’t indicate that that person will win New York, whoever it may be.

This is true for all the states unless there’s a situation as in Wyoming, a Republican state where Cruz won the primary with a huge majority. I think we can safely say that Wyoming would go for Cruz in a general. But Wyoming would probably go for any Republican in a general.

Posted in Election 2016 | 77 Replies

The world is shifting to the right—or what’s called the right

The New Neo Posted on March 17, 2016 by neoMarch 17, 2016

Since this is from Vox, take it with a grain of salt and ignore the message about the “xenophobia” of the right. It nevertheless says something I’ve noticed, which is that candidates of the so-called “right” or even so-called “far right” are gaining support all over Europe. The rise of Donald Trump (who I happen to think is more on the left than the right, except for his anti-illegal-immigrant position) is part of this movement—just as there was a movement to a very different and actual conservatism in the 80s with Reagan and Thatcher in charge, or for that matter to fascism during the 1930s.

Movements that transcend a single nation usually occur because the same or at least similar forces are working on all the countries involved. In this case we don’t have to look at all far for the answer: the dreadful record of so many Western and especially Western European countries in recognizing the cultural and demographic threat that too much immigration (illegal or even at times legal) can pose, and the unwillingness of recent leaders to defend or even listen to those who are alarmed by it.

Instead, those people crying out against illegal immigration and for the defense of their own borders and cultural traditions have been demonized. So they have become angry both at the authorities’ policies and at the nature of the criticism those authorities and the MSM have directed their way.

Here’s what Vox says about the situation in Europe:

Far-right parties like AfD are growing throughout Europe.

Der Spiegel has a nice map on this, showing the countries where far-right parties have a presence in parliament (yellow dots) or are actually part of the government (red dots). It turns out the xenophobic far right has surged in countries as diverse as Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, and Hungary:

rightparties

These parties have, in most cases, ridden the European refugee and migrant crisis to power. While Europeans have for some time been skeptical of migration, the huge surge in migrants last year has dramatically inflamed these sentiments ”” leading to a rise in the far right’s poll numbers. Italy’s Northern League, for example, is polling at four times what it was in 2013.

I predict that if those in charge remain largely unresponsive, this movement will grow and become more angry and more willing and even eager to use violence and/or tyranny to get its way.

[NOTE: I’m not for Trump at all, but that’s not because I disagree with most of his immigration stance. In fact, I agree with most of it and I have from the start (and long before Trump), and I think the candidate I prefer (Cruz) agrees with the gist of it too.]

Posted in Immigration | 47 Replies

Obama nominates Merrick Garland to SCOTUS

The New Neo Posted on March 16, 2016 by neoMarch 16, 2016

Here’s William Jacobson on the subject of Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland. It’s a canny move by Obama, and an expected one—to nominate a “moderate” and to dare the GOP to oppose him.

How the GOP reacts depends on their bet about the 2016 election: will it be Trump vs. Hillary or Cruz vs. Hillary, and who is likely to win in the general? If Clinton is the most likely 2016 president, she would no doubt appoint someone worse than Garland, probably much worse. And yet if GOP approves Garland and a Republican wins the election, they will be hated even more than they are now, if such a thing be possible.

What’s more, if they wait till after the 2016 election and try to squeeze in a Garland approval before the inauguration if Clinton wins the election, the Democrats will filibuster the approval.

Remember, also, the general rule that most moderate justices seem to become more liberal in office over time. So even a moderate often ends up not so moderate after a while, sometimes rather a short while.

Talk about dilemmas. And an awful lot is riding on this.

Posted in Law | 36 Replies

Do I blog to persuade?

The New Neo Posted on March 16, 2016 by neoMarch 16, 2016

Earlier today on a thread about Trump, a commenter asked me how many people I thought I had persuaded to change their minds.

Now, that’s an interesting question, whether the commenter meant it as a taunt or not. Maybe the assumption is that for a person to spend all this time and effort writing posts on a blog that person must be assuming some ability to change people’s minds in the direction of supporting the blogger’s own opinions.

To have that ability and to exercise it would be very very nice indeed. But remember that this blog was started as a discussion about political change and how very very difficult it is to change one’s mind about anything, particularly politics. Although it happens, it’s unusual and ordinarily the result of a complex set of circumstances with multiple and sometimes very personal determinants.

So although an “Aha!” moment for my disagreeing readers as a result of reading one of my incredible post would be great, I think of it as exceedingly rare if it happens at all. That doesn’t mean I’m not trying to be persuasive when I write. I am (trying, that is), but whether I succeed or not I expect that very very few people who initially disagree with me will actually be persuaded to agree with me.

So, why on earth do I blog? Well, I gave some answers here. My response then was pretty much the same as my response would be now:

…[I had wanted] to get a bunch of interested people together regularly for some scintillating conversation, a sort of salon…

The moment I read my very first [blog] I realized I was onto something. Not all blogs, of course; maybe not even most of them. But here, here were my peeps! Here were a bunch of weirdos (sorry folks; I include myself) who liked to jaw-jaw at length about the very sorts of topics I had long been yearning to talk about. What fun!

Right now it’s not as much fun as it would be if I were foreseeing the prospect of a conservative victory in 2016. Right now it’s not as much fun as it is when I’m not dealing with a huge technical glitch that’s causing slow loading, a lot of wasted time, and much blog-posting frustration. But it’s still fun, and those same things still drive me: to talk at length with other interested people about things I find fascinating and worth talking about.

Posted in Blogging and bloggers, Me, myself, and I | 42 Replies

Slooow loading

The New Neo Posted on March 16, 2016 by neoMarch 16, 2016

I’m trying to work out the glitches that have been making the blog load slowly for the last day or two. I’m curious, though, whether all of you are having problems or just some of you. If you can, let me know (1) if you’re having a problem (2) approximately when it began (3) what the problem consists of.

Please be patient; this may take a couple of days. Hopefully, much shorter than that. Thanks. If the blog goes down completely for a while, I’ll try to post something about it on my old blog neo-neocon.blogspot.com . I hadn’t posted there for years, but it seems to still work. I just posted this post there as a test.

I really hate these technical problems. But I suppose it’s all part and parcel of having a blog.

[ADDENDUM 5:52 PM: It’s been loading much faster for me for about an hour or so. Not up to normal speed, but not bad. Has anyone else experienced some improvement?]

Posted in Blogging and bloggers | 33 Replies

Now what?

The New Neo Posted on March 16, 2016 by neoMarch 16, 2016

[NOTE: By the way, I’m still having slow website issues. I’m working on the problem, and it could be fixed very soon or it may take a couple of days. Thanks for your patience.]

I guess Cruz won the game of chicken, because Rubio finally swerved. Way too late for my tastes, and way too late to have helped Cruz win more delegates yesterday.

I predicted four years ago that if Romney lost, the Republican Party would tear itself apart. That appears to have happened. No matter who is nominated, I don’t see a path to victory for anyone but Hillary Clinton, which is mindboggling because she is one of the weakest and most vulnerable candidates I’ve seen in my lifetime.

Now that Rubio has dropped out, it’s possible that the race will change and Cruz will start winning, but it’s probably too late for it to lead to anything but a contested convention. This is the intent of the party when no one has a majority; it’s not just something invented to stymie Trump. If Trump is the clear leader but lacks a majority of delegates on the first ballot there is nothing to stop Rubio from suggesting his delegates vote for Cruz, which could give Cruz the majority. That’s just one scenario, and although Trump supporters will rage and call it “stealing,” it is clearly the sort of possibility that was envisioned when the rules were set up (and it’s the party that makes the rules for its own nominee).

If Cruz is the leader (less likely, but possible), the same would be true for Trump. That is, if he can get other candidates’ delegates to come over to him, he could get the nomination.

So let’s review. Here are the possibilities as I see them:
(1) Trump gets a majority and is the nominee.
(2) Cruz wins in a contested convention.
(3) Trump wins in a contested convention.

And here are the probable results as I see them:

(1) If Trump is the nominee, Hillary beats Trump. I’ve explained many times why I say that, but the summary version is that Trump’s negatives are too high, and there are too many people who say they would never vote for him. For example, a great many conservatives and Republicans say they would stay home. Plus, there is the possibility of someone else running third party or as an Independent, thus splitting the GOP vote still further.

(2) If Cruz is the nominee, Hillary beats Cruz. I say that despite the fact that I think that Cruz probably has a good chance of beating her in a 2-way race, but I think that if Trump is not the nominee a lot of people will vote for him anyway, or stay home, thus splitting the GOP vote or reducing the GOP vote.

In other words, the Republicans are deeply divided, and a house divided against itself cannot stand. I see the left as the beneficiaries.

Obviously, I could be wrong. I hope I’m wrong. I hope the prospects are better than that. But I have to call them like I see them, and at the moment that’s what I see.

[NOTE: I just saw this report:

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump warned Wednesday that his supporters might riot if the GOP tried to steal the nomination away from him at the Republican National Convention in July…

“I think we’ll win before getting to the convention, but I can tell you, if we didn’t and if we’re 20 votes short or if we’re, you know, 100 short and we’re at 1,100 and somebody else is at 500 or 400, because we’re way ahead of everybody, I don’t think you can say that we don’t get it automatically. I think you would have riots,” Trump said. “I think you would have riots.”

You could call that a warning. You could also call it a threat. Or you could call it an observation; a statement of fact. Maybe all three.]

[ADDENDUM: Ace comments on those same remarks of Trump’s:

If Obama said something like this — if he said, “If my Supreme Court nominee isn’t given an up or down vote, I think we’d have riots; I wouldn’t lead it, but I think bad things would happen; that would disenfranchise my voters” — what would you say about that?

Would you nod along and say “You tell ’em, Obama. You rattle that saber about the mob uprisings you could stir.”

Or would you say: “Why does this shady interloper believe he has the right to threaten me?”

Well, I guess having one standard is a pussy thing now.]

Posted in Election 2016 | 89 Replies

Super Ides of March Tuesday

The New Neo Posted on March 15, 2016 by neoMarch 15, 2016

[UPDATE BELOW]

As you can tell from the title, I’m very very very very nervous.

I fully expect Donald Trump to do very very well. If the polls are correct, there is an excellent chance he gets the two winner-take-all states, Florida and Ohio.

I’ve been extremely frustrated that the race has not yet come down to two people, and I fear that if and when it does (and I don’t think Kasich will drop out unless he loses Ohio) it will be too late for an alternative candidate to win. The Tragedy of the Commons, IMHO.

Trump supporters, of course, are jubilant. There’s a lot of crowing already.

UPDATE 9:40 PM

My server seems to be having problems, but they say they are working on it. I apologize for any slowness or difficulty you might be having in reaching the blog. I’m having the same problem at the moment; it should be resolved in the not-too-distant future. Go to my old blog, neo-neocon.blogspot.com , if the problem lasts longer than another day, but hopefully it will be fixed sooner than that.

In other news (the primaries, of course): I am pleased about Ohio, a winner-take-all state that now does not go to Trump. I am less pleased that it went to Kasich, but I expected he would be Trump’s chief rival there. Florida is exactly as expected: Trump wins and now Rubio (to his credit, although too late IMHO) drops out of the race. It’s ironic that Kasich now remains as the last “establishment” candidate, when I think he was the weakest one of them all (even more so than Jeb Bush). Go figure.

Missouri and North Carolina are close with Trump leading Cruz. But they are not winner-take-all states. Trump still seems to have that approxiamtely-40% ceiling, and with Rubio dropping out—if polls are correct in saying the vast majority of Rubio’s votes would go to Cruz—Cruz might really start winning more of these contests outright. I make no predictions, though; all bets are off this year.

Posted in Election 2016 | 53 Replies

Early Frost and late

The New Neo Posted on March 15, 2016 by neoMay 3, 2022

Here’s a very early poem by Robert Frost: “The Tuft of Flowers.”

And by “very early” I mean very; Frost was probably about 22 when he wrote it (1896 or 1897). You can tell it’s early if you know anything about Frost’s poetry. It doesn’t even sound like him—except when it does. He hadn’t come into his mature voice yet, and about two-thirds of the poem sounds as though it could have been written by any flowery (pun intended) poet, with its “o’er” and its ” ‘wildered” (for “bewildered”) and its dawn, and its happy message of human brotherhood.

Very different from the darker, sparer Frost of later years.

And yet it’s still Frost. You can recognize his voice, with a sudden startle, in lines such as “sheer morning gladness at the brim,” and the final aphorism “Men work together…Whether they work together or apart.'” And you can definitely recognize the hint of darkness in the earlier “And I must be, as he had been – alone.” The poem’s uplifting message goes from the bleak “we are all alone” to “we just think we’re alone; but we’re actually together.”

Contrast this to a later poem (published in 1920 when Frost was in his mid-forties, although some think it was actually composed in 1916) that dwells on the “alone” rather than the “together” part, “An Old Man’s Winter Night.” I cannot read it without a shiver.

The language is Frost as we came to know him: plain in cadence yet complex in thought and image. There is nothing obviously or conventionally “poetic” about it, but it is a masterful, beautiful, haunting, chilling poem. It’s not about flowers and growth; it’s about cold and decline. And yet, and yet right at the end, the poet steps back and says “This, too, is life; this, too, is a man who is only connected to the world of others by the most tenuous of threads—his essential humanity. And yet he is still connected.”

Here they are. The first is a nice poem. The second is a masterpiece.

THE TUFT OF FLOWERS

I went to turn the grass once after one
Who mowed it in the dew before the sun.

The dew was gone that made his blade so keen
Before I came to view the levelled scene.

I looked for him behind an isle of trees;
I listened for his whetstone on the breeze.

But he had gone his way, the grass all mown,
And I must be, as he had been, – alone,

”˜As all must be,’ I said within my heart,
”˜Whether they work together or apart.’

But as I said it, swift there passed me by
On noiseless wing a ‘wildered butterfly,

Seeking with memories grown dim o’er night
Some resting flower of yesterday’s delight.

And once I marked his flight go round and round,
As where some flower lay withering on the ground.

And then he flew as far as eye could see,
And then on tremulous wing came back to me.

I thought of questions that have no reply,
And would have turned to toss the grass to dry;

But he turned first, and led my eye to look
At a tall tuft of flowers beside a brook,

A leaping tongue of bloom the scythe had spared
Beside a reedy brook the scythe had bared.

I left my place to know them by their name,
Finding them butterfly weed when I came.

The mower in the dew had loved them thus,
By leaving them to flourish, not for us,

Nor yet to draw one thought of ours to him.
But from sheer morning gladness at the brim.

The butterfly and I had lit upon,
Nevertheless, a message from the dawn,

That made me hear the wakening birds around,
And hear his long scythe whispering to the ground,

And feel a spirit kindred to my own;
So that henceforth I worked no more alone;

But glad with him, I worked as with his aid,
And weary, sought at noon with him the shade;

And dreaming, as it were, held brotherly speech
With one whose thought I had not hoped to reach.

“‘Men work together,’ I told him from the heart,
‘Whether they work together or apart.’”

AN OLD MAN’S WINTER NIGHT

All out of doors looked darkly in at him
Through the thin frost, almost in separate stars,
That gathers on the pane in empty rooms.
What kept his eyes from giving back the gaze
Was the lamp tilted near them in his hand.
What kept him from remembering what it was
That brought him to that creaking room was age.
He stood with barrels round him – at a loss.
And having scared the cellar under him
In clomping there, he scared it once again
In clomping off; – and scared the outer night,
Which has its sounds, familiar, like the roar
Of trees and crack of branches, common things,
But nothing so like beating on a box.
A light he was to no one but himself
Where now he sat, concerned with he knew what,
A quiet light, and then not even that.
He consigned to the moon, such as she was,
So late-arising, to the broken moon
As better than the sun in any case
For such a charge, his snow upon the roof,
His icicles along the wall to keep;
And slept. The log that shifted with a jolt
Once in the stove, disturbed him and he shifted,
And eased his heavy breathing, but still slept.
One aged man – one man – can’t fill a house,
A farm, a countryside, or if he can,
It’s thus he does it of a winter night.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Poetry | 2 Replies

Explaining the research replicability problem

The New Neo Posted on March 15, 2016 by neoMarch 15, 2016

Here.

Posted in Science | 7 Replies

I’m wondering too

The New Neo Posted on March 15, 2016 by neoMarch 15, 2016

The previous election cycle and now this one have caused me to agree with DirtyJobsGuy:

“It makes you wonder how many little tyrants are out there.”

If there’s one thing that’s now clear, it’s that many many people—left and right—don’t mind a strongman or even a tyrant if they think that the strongman or tyrant is on their side. Ends justify means, if the ends are the ends you desire.

Posted in Election 2016 | 10 Replies

I’m not sure…

The New Neo Posted on March 14, 2016 by neoMarch 14, 2016

…whether this will help or hurt Kasich at this point. Toss a coin.

Posted in Election 2016, Romney | 39 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • huxley on Veterans Day; Armistice Day
  • Ray Van Dune on Veterans Day; Armistice Day
  • Sharon W on Open thread 11/11/2026
  • Kate on News roundup
  • whatever on News roundup

Recent Posts

  • News roundup
  • Veterans Day; Armistice Day
  • Open thread 11/11/2026
  • The refinery issue
  • This type of ed is special, all right

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (330)
  • Afghanistan (98)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (164)
  • Best of neo-neocon (91)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (599)
  • Dance (292)
  • Disaster (244)
  • Education (329)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (566)
  • Election 2018 (33)
  • Election 2020 (514)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (125)
  • Election 2028 (14)
  • Evil (130)
  • Fashion and beauty (324)
  • Finance and economics (1,054)
  • Food (319)
  • Friendship (48)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (737)
  • Health (1,169)
  • Health care reform (546)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (338)
  • History (720)
  • Immigration (452)
  • Iran (467)
  • Iraq (227)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (836)
  • Jews (445)
  • Language and grammar (365)
  • Latin America (216)
  • Law (2,997)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (125)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,335)
  • Liberty (1,119)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (394)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,524)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (935)
  • Middle East (385)
  • Military (327)
  • Movies (355)
  • Music (534)
  • Nature (262)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (185)
  • Obama (1,740)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (132)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,051)
  • Poetry (259)
  • Political changers (179)
  • Politics (2,797)
  • Pop culture (397)
  • Press (1,636)
  • Race and racism (885)
  • Religion (431)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (642)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (983)
  • Theater and TV (266)
  • Therapy (71)
  • Trump (1,638)
  • Uncategorized (4,636)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,465)
  • War and Peace (1,036)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑