I’m having connectivity problems. Hopefully they will be temporary. I just got online, and I’m slapping this post up to let you know what’s happening, just in case I lose the connection forthwith. [ADDENDUM: About 45 minutes later it’s still … Continue reading →
Kathleen Sebelius uses the Marxist buzz-word.
Continue reading →…will issue a retraction? Didn’t think so.
Continue reading →Even if they’re young: Though many students are liberals on social issues, the economic reality of a weak job market has taken a toll on their loyalties: far fewer 18- to 29-year-olds now identify themselves as Democrats compared with 2008.
Continue reading →…dreams of the Obama he fell in love with many moons ago, the one that doesn’t exist and never did.
Continue reading →In Adam Gopnik’s lengthy piece on Churchill in the New Yorker, he writes: For Churchill always thought in terms not of national interest but of a national character that could trump interest. The Germans “combine in the most deadly manner … Continue reading →
Some good news.
Continue reading →…it does.
Continue reading →…with the vacations.
Continue reading →August 6th was the 65th anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, and I recycled this piece for the occasion. It ended with these words: It’s much harder to convince a WWII vet that Hiroshima was an … Continue reading →
…when it’s considered worthy of note that a primary candidate endorsed by the president of the United States actually manages to win the primary.
Continue reading →Scott at Powerline thinks that Andrew Breitbart is the new William Buckley for the conservative movement. I wish. I agree that both men demonstrate[d] a good sense of theater, but I stand by my comparison yesterday of Breitbart to Yippies … Continue reading →