Okay, Superbowl thread!
I don’t care about football. But I’ve got the TV on as I work, and if I’m rooting for anyone, it’s for the Saints, because I like underdogs. But it’s the ads that interest me. The theme: manhood, with a … Continue reading →
neo
Narcissism, thy name is Obama
Two links for your perusal: this and this. Perhaps you will agree with me that they are very, very disturbing. It has always been clear that Obama has an unusual amount of egotism, even for a politician. But these incidents … Continue reading →
Emanual vs. Holder: it’s on Eric!
Jane Mayer’s puff piece on Eric Holder appeared recently in the New Yorker. Anyone who reads blogs or periodicals on the right, and who has followed the controversies involving Holder’s decisions about the KSM trial and the Christmas bomber—especially Andrew … Continue reading →
It’s the independents, stupid
Obama’s support is dropping among the independents of New Hampshire. This has become a general trend for Obama; the Scott Brown election polls and results showed the same precipitous decline among independents in Massachusetts, whose swing from Democratic to Republican … Continue reading →
Obama and the core of “corpsman”
It’s a small point; really very small in the larger scheme of things: President Obama mispronounced the title “Corpsman” several times at a prayer breakfast, saying “Corpse-man” instead of the proper “Core-man.” The usual suspects have criticized him for this … Continue reading →
Sullivan, Edwards, Palin and the Atlantic
I don’t link to Andrew Sullivan, and you may notice I ordinarily don’t discuss him. And I’m not going to do too much of either here, except to say I consider that something very sad and disturbing happened to his … Continue reading →
Too much heat for the boiling frog?
I often think that, had Pelosi, Reid, and Obama been just a little smarter, they would have moved more slowly and incrementally to the left. If they had not given away their hand so quickly, they might have lulled the … Continue reading →
What’s Obama got against Vegas?
Twice he’s spoken out against going to that city. Why? Here’s my PJ article in which I speculate on why Obama might have it in for Vegas. [NOTE: On looking at the comments over at PJ, I notice that some … Continue reading →
Obama’s philosophically fascist SOTU speech
Fascinating analysis here, by a student at Obama’s alma mater, Harvard Law School.
Continue reading →And speaking of Vegas: can Republicans run the table in the Senate elections of 2010?
I wouldn’t bet on it. But it’s theoretically possible that Republicans could win back the Senate in 2010 if they play their cards right. There are ten Senate seats in play that are currently held by Democrats but are considered … Continue reading →
Jenny Sanford tells all…
…but the question is, why? I don’t completely understand this need of the wronged spouse to publicly unburden herself (and it’s usually a “her”), either through writing a book or granting interviews, or often both—the latter to promote the former. … Continue reading →
Obama does not heart Vegas
And it seems he may have it in for Harry Reid, too.
Continue reading →