Commenter “reliapundit” has a question: Gingrich retook the lead in SC thanks to…conservatives…who no longer seem to have any problems endorsing a serial adulterer—one who gave the finger to the Tea Party when he endorsed Scozzafava. And thanks to a … Continue reading →
I’ve got an article up today at PJ with some background on the old (actually, not all that old) “women and children first” rule in maritime disasters. Please click on the link and read the article first, and then come … Continue reading →
So, tomorrow’s South Carolina’s big day. As a Romney supporter, I wish he’d take a much more aggressive tack in either releasing his tax returns—or, perhaps more importantly, explaining why he pays 15% and why that’s not only perfectly legal … Continue reading →
I have about a thousand things I could write today. But they’ll have to wait for this evening (well, not all thousand of them, but I plan to tackle one or two) because I have some other tasks to do … Continue reading →
The definition of autism is about to be narrowed, which may cut the number of people designated as having autism or espcially Asperger’s, and will be likely to reduce the number who will be able to receive benefits because of … Continue reading →
I can’t. I’m just plain exhausted with these things. I cannot even imagine where the candidates get the energy to do this again so soon. I guess the answer would be “vaulting ambition, which o’erleaps itself.” You can go here … Continue reading →
Commenter “Wolla Dalbo” asks the following question: Neo”“Over the years you have been very calm and even-handed in your criticisms and treatment of all sorts of people and issues. Yet, in the language and arguments you have been using with … Continue reading →
The good news for Gingrich? Perry’s out of the race and has thrown his support behind him. Will all of Perry’s votes (6% at last count) go to Newt? And would it matter enough to allow Gingrich to win South … Continue reading →
…he’d do any better against Obama? And if so, why? Multiple “yes’s” and “no’s” are allowed here: —because Newt’s a non-flip-floppy conservative? —because of Newt’s persuasive abilities? —because Newt’s such a charismatic guy? —because of Newt’s stellar record as a … Continue reading →
It seems as though every ship disaster has at least one goat and at least one hero. Titanic had many self-sacrificing heroes, and it had Bruce Ismay as the main goat, although there were others. Captain Edward Smith was both … Continue reading →
…maybe not so much. [Hat tip: Instapundit.]
Continue reading →You may not know about the 24-hour Wiki blackout*, but I certainly do, because it’s cramping my style. Just a little, anyway. Wiki is often a surprisingly good source for general background information, although it’s hardly impeccable. But then, few … Continue reading →