Home » The Pope in Algeria

Comments

The Pope in Algeria — 40 Comments

  1. Not a Catholic, but I married into a Catholic family of Italian and Irish. I think this pope and his predecessor are the true wolves in sheep’s clothing. Leftist infiltration to destroy one of the world’s more traditional Christian religions.

    It’s been going on for sometime, starting of course with academia where traditional catholic colleges have become CINOs over the last several decades.

  2. He’s just another Progressive who thinks all sins are sins of the Western “oppressor”. Thus, obsequiousness to the real oppressors.

    In Marxist terms, he’s a useful idiot.

  3. I am a Johnny-come-lately Catholic. From an atheist/Protestant family, I have an inquiring mind, did my homework, including a careful read of Paul Johnson’s fine History of Christianity, and became a convert to Roman Catholicism at an advanced age.

    Catholic Christianity begat Western Civilization. Yes, it did. Chew on that, you disbelievers.

  4. I’m with Trump and Melanie Phillips on this. What world is Pope Leo living in?

    I am personally acquainted with Christians living in the Muslim countries of North Africa. They do try to work with Muslim neighbors towards living in peace with them wherever possible — without compromising their faith. Their churches have Muslim converts, about which they have to be quiet, because it’s very dangerous. What they DON’T do is pretend that Islam and Christianity are just the same. The Pope is undercutting Christians living in Muslim countries. Shame on him.

  5. Cicero, what you say MAY be true, but this idiot pope had nothing to do with that. He sides with the savages from the 7th century

  6. “Islam is a religion of peace we can learn from.” Robert Francis Prevost aka ‘pope’ leo

    It is not possible to have even a cursory familiarity with Islam’s tenets and still believe that to be true.

    “a French think tank (Fondapol) tracked Islamic terrorist attacks going back to 1979. From 1979 through April 2024, they identified 66,872 attacks killing at least 249,941 people — with the vast majority of that activity occurring after 9/11″

  7. Sounds like we took a similar trip CICERO, but I converted when I was in my mid 30’s. You’re right about Johnson’s History of Christianity. His History of the Jews is great too. In fact, just read anything by Paul Johnson you can.

  8. I recall an Anglican bishop in Turkey blathering on about how well Christians and Muslims get along.

    * Never mind that Istanbul was once Constantinople, the center of the Byzantine Empire and the Eastern Orthodox Church.
    * Never mind that now Christians are barely 0.2% of the population of Turkey.
    * Never mind that now Jews barely exist at all in Turkey.

    Yes, Turkish Muslims get along well with Christians and Jews once Muslims have virtually extinguished them.

  9. The reason there were more than a million Catholics in Algeria in 1955 but hardly around 8000 today is that in 1955 there were around a million French people in Algeria, most of them born there.

    Algeria has been a colony of France since 1830s. After 1962, when Algeria was granted independence following a bloody and beastly war, most of the French Algerians, pied-noirs, as they were known, fled Algeria for good.

    Hence the huge difference in numbers.

  10. Huxley

    Christianity does not handle outright evil very well. Prisoners of the “Gentle Jesus, meek and mild” ethos.

  11. Among the many appeals to me of Catholicism is its depth and history. If you were a brilliant mind before, say, 1550, you studied theology. I’m convinced that Aquinas and Augustine were the equivalent of Einstein and Newton, and maybe Anselm = Dirac, extending the analogy. Of course I read the bible, but for me to think I’m going to understand the bible and scripture better than Aquinas and Augustine, is a bit like me thinking I’m going to understand physics better then Einstein and Newton. That said, I love to read physics. Anyway, if I need guidance on religion/theology I know where to turn.

  12. Richard Cook, there is no Western Civilization without Christianity.

    Western Civ = Judeo/Christian + Greco/Roman.

  13. Richard Cook @7:57pm:
    If you do not know what I’m talking about, I can’t help you.

    Mike Plaiss gets it. Bless you, Mike.

  14. You can’t sugarcoat evil by praising it as redemptive. Evil is evil. Now it all makes sense why the Pope popped off on Trump about Iran. He thinks Iran is somehow just a Pope speech away from becoming Heaven on Earth.

  15. @Davemay: I think you also get it. Just when the Judeo and the Greco started may be open to debate, perhaps in the 800 to 1000 BCE time slot?
    But radically augmented by Francis Bacon and a focus on learning about the reality of God’s laws via solid empirical experimentation and discussion.

    Then somewhere between Darwin and Lord Kelvin and Einstein and Crick and Watson, and a few dozen other lights, the scripture of the OT and NT became more mystical, mythical, and allegorical, but it appears to be no less helpful to its core purpose than before.

  16. Anyone who calls Islam a religion of peace is a fool, knave, or both!

    Another abomination from Chicago.

  17. The Pope’s theological education began at the Catholic Theological Union in Chicago. Founded in 1968, influenced by 60’s radicalism and inspired by the Second Vatican Council it’s not surprising he’s more comfortable with the principles of liberation theology than he is with traditional catholic teaching. With notable alumni such as Saleha Jabin, the first female Muslim chaplain in the DOD (now DOW), it’s little wonder how his theological views were formed.

  18. Born into a Roman Catholic family. Educated exclusively in Catholic schools, graduated from Notre Dame. After all that, I knew a lot about the catholic church but little about Christianity or its source book, The Bible. I was no more a Christian than is the current pope. It’s the “Five Solas” for me, thanks. At the very least, it spares me the embarassment of acknowledging a pure apostate like this Leo is the soi disant “vicar of Christ” and the titular head of my church.

  19. Just thought I would add Daniel Greenfieldhttps://www.danielgreenfield.org/2026/04/pope-leo-celebrates-christian-genocide.html#more.

  20. in 1955 there were around a million French people in Algeria, most of them born there.
    ==
    The pieds noirs were from Mediterranean Europe generally, commonly Italian or Spanish.

  21. Bishops are NGO administrators and I suspect if you carefully question some randomly selected bishops and their staffs, you’d discover the distribution of opinion therein wasn’t much different from that of your local state college.

  22. I post this from six doors down from the Catholic Theological Union in Chicago!
    My DIL parks her car in their parking lot.

    Cradle Catholic–twelve years of daily religion class.

    This Pope is a Marist globalist–absolutely not question

    NO educated Catholic doesn’t know about Just War from about sixth grade on–except, apparently, this Chicago Leftist installed Pope.
    Who, thanks to DJT, is exposed for all to see.

  23. “In 1955, Algeria had over 1 million Catholics and 140,000 Jews. Today [April 17], as Pope Leo visits Algeria, there are some 8,000 Catholics in Algeria and there are fewer than 200 Jews.”

    Not about the Pope, but it is exactly this kind if statistic that I try to point out when people yammer on about Palestinian’s right to return. The right to return must be BOTH sides (Palestinians AND Jews) in order to be fair.

    All across North Africa and through out the Middle East Jews were forced from their homes in places where their families had lived for centuries. How about their right to return (or compensation for what they lost)?

    As for this pope, Neo, I am afraid that you are right in that he is further left than his predecessor. Hopefully, it doesn’t give his voice more listeners; but, rather it makes folks see him as more irrelevant and that what he says is of little value.

  24. “Then somewhere between Darwin and Lord Kelvin and Einstein and Crick and Watson, and a few dozen other lights, the scripture of the OT and NT became more mystical, mythical, and allegorical, but it appears to be no less helpful to its core purpose than before.” -R2L

    Quite the contrary. As we’ve gained new insights, the gap between the material and non-material has shrunk.

    The key claim of Christianity is very specific. Jesus was raised from the dead.

    Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15, describes the essence of Christianity. He certainly describes it plainly.

    But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised.
    For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.
    Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.
    If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied. But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead.

    Earlier in the chapter, he lists the people that saw Jesus after the crucifixion.

    For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.

    Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep.

    Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.

  25. @ lee >”NO educated Catholic doesn’t know about Just War from about sixth grade on–except, apparently, this Chicago Leftist installed Pope.
    Who, thanks to DJT, is exposed for all to see.

    Cue the Streisand effect.
    (I found so many interesting articles, I’m making a separate comment for them.)

    Trump may have gotten the final mic drop with this response, on April 17.
    https://www.belgrade-news.com/townnews/politics/tell-that-to-the-pope-trump-pope-leo-keep-up-their-row-over-u-s/article_d902cfca-bc8d-487f-9e52-9d340b7b58ae.html

    Trump was asked Thursday about Iran’s crackdowns on dissidents during the current ceasefire in the war. That includes planned executions of four protesters, including a woman.

    “Tell that to the pope,” Trump said.

    *******
    I have never heard of the Belgrade News before**, but they were the only post on the first-page of my search for Trump’s line, despite a plethora of news reports on the kerfluffle itself. Most of those were from the left (of course) and had slanted headlines (of courser), but this one from CBS did cover a lot of material I hadn’t seen before; and, although it omitted the full text of the Pope’s message that started the whole thing, it did include the “God doesn’t hear the prayers” reference and linked to the pontificate’s Xweet on March 29.

    https://x.com/Pontifex/status/2038209125646016547

    Pope Leo XIV
    @Pontifex
    This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war. He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them, saying: “Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen: your hands are full of blood” (Is 1:15).
    4:58 AM · Mar 29, 2026

    As many have pointed out, including Neo and the Neophiles (new band!), “Those who wage war” are not the target of the prophet Isaiah’s words; he is addressing rebellious ancient Jews who are disobeying God’s commandments.
    (See yet another separate comment.)

    In fairness to Pope Leo, he says that some of his remarks were prepared long before Trump first attacked Iran, and were not intended to refer to him. YMMV.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-dispute-trump-pope-leo-escalated/

    Operation Epic Fury, which began on Feb. 28 with joint U.S. and Israeli airstrikes on Iran, served as the catalyst for the ongoing exchange of words between Pope Leo and Mr. Trump.

    The day after the military operation began, the pontiff expressed “deep concern” and urged the warring parties to “stop the spiral of violence before it becomes an irreparable abyss.” His words grew sharper as the war continued, with Francis [sic] condemning Mr. Trump’s threat to destroy Iranian civilization as “unacceptable” and urging citizens to “contact the authorities — political leaders, congressmen.”
    [AF: That remark clearly was directed at Trump.]

    The U.S. and Iran agreed to a two-week ceasefire on April 7, but Mr. Trump and Leo have continued to trade barbs,

    [AF: the timeline then begins on April 12, NOT February 29, despite the statements above.
    Trump’s remarks have been pretty comprehensively covered, so I haven’t copied them here.]

    April 13: …
    In response to Mr. Trump’s broadsides, Leo said, “The things that I say are certainly not meant as attacks on anyone, and the message of the Gospel is very clear: ‘Blessed are the peacemakers.'”

    “I have no fear of the Trump administration, or speaking out loudly of the message of the Gospel, which is what I believe I am here to do, what the church is here to do,” he said. “We are not politicians, we don’t deal with foreign policy with the same perspective he might understand it, but I do believe in the message of the Gospel, as a peacemaker.”

    [AF: The Pope’s words make Johnson’s remarks something of a “rebuttal” although not intended that way, I think.]
    GOP House Speaker Mike Johnson, like Vance, also disputed Leo’s remarks about war, in particular that Jesus does not hear the prayers of those who engage in war. He may have been referring to the pope’s post from March 29, which said, “He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them.”

    Johnson, an evangelical Christian, told reporters he “was taken a little bit aback” by that remark and argued, “It is a very well-settled matter of Christian theology: There’s something called the Just War doctrine.”

    The Archdiocese for the Military Services explains that a just war is one that is defensive and launched as a last resort: “The damage inflicted by the aggressor…must be lasting, grave, and certain.” It must have “a serious prospect of success,” and “the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated.”

    Johnson sought to defend the president’s and vice president’s comments and actions in those terms and said their remarks reflect “their understanding” from “classified briefings of the stakes that are so high in the situation that we’re facing, and the fact that you have the nation that was the largest sponsor of terrorism now having had that ability taken away from them. That means potentially, millions of innocent people will be able to keep their lives and not get killed by terrorists. That’s a good thing.”

    The House speaker also said a “pontiff or any religious leader can say anything they want, but obviously, if you wade into political waters, I think you should expect some political response, and I think the pope’s received some of that.”

    April 16: …
    Leo, who was traveling in Cameroon, posted on X, “Woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic, and political gain, dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth.”

    [AF: a good warning in general, looking at some of the statements coming from religious leaders in toto, but maybe not the best optics in light of this post of Neo’s.]

    April 18: …
    While traveling from Cameroon to Angola, Leo said a “certain narrative” about his interactions with Mr. Trump has “not been accurate in all of its aspects,” some of his comments had been prepared weeks before the president first criticized him.

    “Much of what has been written since then has been more commentary upon commentary, trying to interpret what has been said,” Leo said. “The talk that I gave at the Prayer Meeting for Peace a couple of days ago was prepared two weeks ago, well before the president ever commented on myself and on the message of peace that I am promoting.”

    [AF: This does NOT address the February comments that were the original catalyst for the “debate.” I have seen at least one comment on-line suggesting that perhaps the Pope didn’t intend to reference Trump and Iran with the Isaiah scripture, but had cut down some longer remarks without realizing what might be inferred. I was willing to take that view until I saw that stand-alone Pontifex Xweet and its timing.]

    “And yet as it happens, it was looked at as if I was trying to debate, again, the president, which is not in my interest at all,” Leo added.

    Well, he got that right.

    As several pundits have observed: in this affair, “the Pope shot first.”

    Per my good buddy from Wyoming: Don’t start none, won’t be none.

    **Now it all makes sense: “The Belgrade News is grateful and honored to be the primary source of quality local news in the central and western areas of the Gallatin Valley in Southwest Montana.”

  26. In re The Streisand Effect – maybe look at who’s looking at the offending posts before going off the rails?

    The reputationx post had some interesting and potential useful information that the “definition” sites don’t include. All of them include examples beyond Barbra’s lawyers’ ill-fated lawfare.

    https://www.britannica.com/topic/Streisand-effect

    https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-streisand-effect-fallacies-biases

    https://www.reputationx.com/blog/what-is-the-streisand-effect

  27. In re the scripture bashing observations about Pope Leo’s Xtweet (which is the label I’ve often heard applied to disputants pulling quotes out of context to beat each other with).

    I think it’s worth quoting more of the scripture passage, for the record.
    It does lend some credence to the theory that Pope Leo was extending Isaiah’s remarks to “those who wage war,” given that he has already criticized Trump’s domestic policies, which the Leftists often assign to the categories referred to herein, not that many of them actually believe in God or His justice.

    (See the first part of the CBS post above. I thought it was interesting that the CBS reporters got the wrong pope in part of the write-up.)

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%201&version=NIV

    1 The vision concerning Judah and Jerusalem that Isaiah son of Amoz saw during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.

    2 Hear me, you heavens! Listen, earth!
    For the Lord has spoken:
    “I reared children and brought them up,
    but they have rebelled against me.
    3 The ox knows its master,
    the donkey its owner’s manger,
    but Israel does not know,
    my people do not understand.”

    4 Woe to the sinful nation,
    a people whose guilt is great,
    a brood of evildoers,
    children given to corruption!
    They have forsaken the Lord;
    they have spurned the Holy One of Israel
    and turned their backs on him.

    10 Hear the word of the Lord,
    you rulers of Sodom;
    listen to the instruction of our God,
    you people of Gomorrah!
    11 “The multitude of your sacrifices—
    what are they to me?” says the Lord.
    “I have more than enough of burnt offerings,
    of rams and the fat of fattened animals;
    I have no pleasure
    in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats.

    12 When you come to appear before me,
    who has asked this of you,
    this trampling of my courts?
    13 Stop bringing meaningless offerings!
    Your incense is detestable to me.

    15 When you spread out your hands in prayer,
    I hide my eyes from you;
    even when you offer many prayers,
    I am not listening.

    Your hands are full of blood!

    16 Wash and make yourselves clean.
    Take your evil deeds out of my sight;
    stop doing wrong.
    17 Learn to do right; seek justice.
    Defend the oppressed.
    Take up the cause of the fatherless;
    plead the case of the widow.

    18 “Come now, let us settle the matter,”
    says the Lord.
    “Though your sins are like scarlet,
    they shall be as white as snow;
    though they are red as crimson,
    they shall be like wool.

    19 If you are willing and obedient,
    you will eat the good things of the land;
    20 but if you resist and rebel,
    you will be devoured by the sword.”
    For the mouth of the Lord has spoken.

    27 Zion will be delivered with justice,
    her penitent ones with righteousness.

    28 But rebels and sinners will both be broken,
    and those who forsake the Lord will perish.

  28. AesopFan, on Neo’s post on the ‘your hands are full of blood’ quote from the Pope, I commented that I suspect he had already queued up a broadside based on the first portion of Isaiah 1 that you quoted above, and the imagery from verse 15 was just too good wrt the ongoing kinetic action in Iran for him to pass up taking a shot at Trump (and Vance and Hegseth), even if he knew the context didn’t fit.

  29. (It also helps if one assumes that the folks in one’s—global—audience are scriptural illiterates…)

    File under: Gosh, can’t the President take a…metaphor!?

  30. @ Christopher B – thanks, I thought I had seen that comment on one of Neo’s posts.
    If true, I hope the Pope and his team have learned that the internet era does not allow anyone a pass for taking important points out of context.

    Blogs and commenters are kind of like X’s “community notes” spread over multiple outlets.

  31. Speaking of Leo and the Internet, there’s this. And this should be bigger if it is true.

    https://bigmodernism.substack.com/p/leo-xiv-joined-a-communist-march

    At the time while the Italian Communist Party was probably the most reformist of the Moscow line European Communist Parties with its “Eurocommunism” it was still a vanguard party and client of Moscow with a brutally hostile relationship to the Catholic Church and basically any cleric going to Italy was made sure to be informed about it. So marching with them specifically was an awful look and set you apart from the typical Christian, even among the sort of Christian Pacifist types.

    It would also make the glazing of the genocidal scumbags in the FLN and their somehow more Islamist splinter factions part of a pattern.

    Again, if this photo is true and actually depicts a young Prevost, it would also be an inoculation to the TDS. So while Baghdad Bauxite seems to have been unusually quiet lately (perhaps getting to the culinary crow backlog?) this along with a basic chronology should nuke* the “Trump started a fight with the Pope” argument from orbit and remove the idea that Trump was somehow special in regards to Leo’s politics or hostility to conservative American Presidents.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics