Home » Roundup!

Comments

Roundup! — 17 Comments

  1. (2) Everyone’s death is “medically foreseeable”

    (5) No criticism of Trump is too “odd” or at variance from reality for his critics.

  2. 2. Through my Wife’s 18 months of treatment for Cancer, she never once though about ending her life. Yes, once she thought about stopping treatment, but didn’t. We had Hospice that last 2 weeks. Some drugs to help her with anxiety. Didn’t need any for pain. She had her very strong faith. And now she is with our Cat Family, at peace.
    5. Retread of last time

  3. Being as I’m Roman Catholic, I’m obliged (albeit willingly and happily) to oppose suicide and abortion. I like what Katherine Hepburn once said in regard to suicide and her disapproval thereof: “It’s bad manners to go to a party when you haven’t been invited to it.”

  4. “and show the president worked roughly 50-hour weeks, not counting any official duties that may have been performed on weekends.”
    I imagine it is not at all difficult for most professionals to have many 50 hour weeks in a given year. Occasionally much greater and sometimes less for dr. appts, etc. [the “privilege” of the salaried “elite”] I was happy to spend the extra few hours at work per day to avoid the congestion of commuting home, plus get that final sense of getting something done.

    And if your personal and professional life includes the resources to avoid mowing the lawn, repairing stuff, planning and cooking and shopping for food, etc., then those hours are also freed up to do what still must be an exciting and challenging job, even for the seasoned executive we perceive Trump to be.

    Also, a lot of work gets done “under the covers” and by others before the final result is promoted and made visible – so it is made to look easier than it really was [consider the tariff arm twisting but also that we still have no real confidence that Putin will stop killing people and settle for less than his heart’s desire.]

  5. Canadian here. I can’t give you general answers for (2), but I can share a specific one. A long-term employee of mine (who I will call Mike) worked for me for thirty-three years, and was diagnosed with ALS in late 2023. He was 64, and on the cusp of retirement.

    He knew the expected trajectory of his disease, and said when it got bad enough, he would choose MAID. He had no wife, no children, and had watched his younger sister die with this exact disease in the pre-MAID era. Her passing was unpleasant.

    The progress of Mike’s disease was slow, but inexorable: It only goes one way. Reduction in use of limbs, inability to swallow, loss of mobility, independence, reliance on feeding tube to survive. Eventually, he would be diaper-clad and bed-bound.

    There was no government coercion, no pushing of MAID: Home care and palliative care were all available. Just the availability as an option if he wished to pursue it. Lots of checks and balances and discussions with medical professionals.

    ALS does not follow a steady path: It can plateau, then suddenly significant changes and restrictions occur. Mike decided in September that he was ready, and arranged for MAID on October 15.

    We spent the previous week visiting him. It is still a bit surreal: He was here October 14 and gone October 15. He did not want me present during the process, so my last communication with him was by email early in the morning the day he died.

    Good, bad, right, wrong? I don’t know. He felt he was able to regain some control of a disease that robbed him of so much. He made the choice willingly, and honestly, I might do the same in his position.

  6. Thanks much for that story/testimony.

    One assumes that your friend (and his condition) is exactly what MAID was intended to address.

    However, one quickly starts to read about the abuses and questionable decisions.

    …Speaking of “unintended consequences”…

    “HIGHER EDUCATION BUBBLE UPDATE: AI is Destroying the University, and Learning Itself.”—
    https://instapundit.com/759925/

    (OTOH, should one assume they’re “unintended”…?)

  7. #2,

    It’s an interesting question that came up in my mind over the past year. As my sister-in-law who is now 5 years out from colon cancer says, “cancer f’s with your mind.” I just passed my first 6 month eval, but the damn thing is always in the back of my thoughts. One may have passed the medically defined cure state of 5 years, but one never feels really cured.

    I have, at this point, decided if any subsequent 6 month eval comes up positive, I probably, like Shirehome’s wife, go for just palliative care. I’m too old to hold out for another few years by going through more medical torture. If I was 50, maybe a different decision. And yes, if the disease gets bad enough, the thought of just ending it all has crossed my mind.

  8. 2 Melanoma surgeries in 3 years here.
    Bet you ass I’m sweating it for weeks before my 2X yearly exam.

  9. Selfie-abortions are a fetus… feature of Planned Personhood. Progress. Throw another baby on the barbie, it’s over.

  10. The hard cases, the incurable and terminal suffering cases, those are the camel’s nose under the tent. The true point of MAID is to deny expensive care: it’s being sold as compassion but it’s actually finance.

    If Canada is anything like the US, then about 5% of the sickest people are responsible for more than 50% of the total medical costs. Quite aside from the medical costs, you also have the costs of keeping healthy old people who are retired for 20-30 years.

    The other big source of expense is newborns with congenital problems. Oh you’d better believe MAID is intended for such cases. Their bills at the beginning of their lives are of course enormous when heroic interventions are made to save them, and often their early childhood is expensive as well, when most children don’t have anything worse than chicken pox and owies and booboos.

    For terminally ill people who truly wish to refuse treatment (as opposed to those whose existence is inconvenient to the relatives with their power of attorney) there is almost certainly some simple way to accommodate that, without creating a slippery slope system down which to shove sick people who are spending too much money–usually the government’s money.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics