Home » The Ruthless podcast: Mamdani on how to deal with escalating altercations

Comments

The Ruthless podcast: Mamdani on how to deal with escalating altercations — 17 Comments

  1. What I could read of the action-card at Neo’s link isn’t entirely useless, especially in terms of thinking ahead for some types of conflict that you might experience under general conditions in every-day affairs or at businesses.
    They aren’t very helpful if you are confronting a sicko with a gun in your face.

    The headline to the instructions:
    “Never Forget: Zohran Mamdani and Tiffany Caban put out this flyer urging you to distract violent criminals by “spilling your soda,” or asking if you knew them in high school.”

    And so forth.

    To be fair, sometimes it is possible to distract people who want to harm you, but the circumstances are very limited, and IIRC are generally hostage situations where the victim has time to interact with the criminal. And the criminal is not hard-core and intent on wreaking havoc more than extorting ransom.
    See October 7.

    The criminals who are planning on committing violence per se are not going to be listening to you, and won’t care what you say if they are.

  2. i’m reminded of demolition man, that curious darkly comic take on Brave New World, where the authorities are told to address ‘maniacs in a calm tone of voice’
    yes that works out in a world without morlocks, when they are present,

    the flipside is the dystopic purge where they peculiarly suggest one night of violent nihilism, will settle all accounts, I think that would spiral out of control as we saw in 2020, yes there were restrictions on use of force, but I don’t think that would work, the four of the last six years have illustrated how far chaos can result,

  3. As a Muslim who supports the fundamental transformation of America into a fully collectivist nation, Mamdani seeks America’s dissolution, a necessary precondition to its transformation. Rampant, uncontrolled crime is simply a means to facilitate the societal transformation of America into the United Socialist States of Amerika.

  4. @ miguel > “one night of violent nihilism, will settle all accounts”

    As you say, once you open that spigot it’s hard to turn it off again.
    The equivalent in the right-wing internet is warnings against pushing too hard against “those who just want to be left alone.”
    Or Kipling’s “When the Saxon began to hate.”

    And the maxims “Liberals are playing with fire and they don’t know it’s hot” or “liberals think violence is a dial and conservatives know it’s a switch.”

  5. A projection on the part of liberal, of course what happened since 2020, is quite close to how the purge would really work, in the blue cities, the police have been demoralized, and criminals empowered, lives lost by the scores, seemingly with the indifference of the rulers, who if they were imposed by an enemy power, would they do anything different, in red states like tennessee you have memphis and nashville, which have clearly deteorated, in blue states, we don’t need to repeat the litany,

  6. I’m cracking up, imagining the scenario where I am being held up by someone who is a minority—me, so pale that my husband says I make snow look beige—“Hey, didn’t I go to high school with you?”

  7. When I attended a progressive Episcopal church, the standard metaphor for problems, including crime and the Middle East, reduced life to a kindergarten playground.

    No one is right or wrong. It’s just a matter of good teachers breaking up silly squabbles. One member’s solution was to ask “What Would Dumbledore Do?”

    My impression was that many Episcopalians led sheltered lives.

  8. I found, ” SHERIFF’S OFFICE! KNOCK IT OFF, OR YOU WILL GET SPRAYED! ” And then spraying them with Fox, ( 5,300,000 Scoville Heat Units ), if they didn’t, generally worked.

  9. I finally got around to catching up with my favorite intel analyst, J. E. Dyer, with her “round up” post on 8/14. In addition to observations on a variety of topics discussed at Neo’s, and many that are not, she had this warning about the dark side of Mamdani’s intentions.

    https://theoptimisticconservative.wordpress.com/2025/08/14/toc-ready-room-14-august-2025-gaza-et-al-russian-missiles-perspectives-on-qatar-iran-mental-health-more/

    I’ll conclude with some comments I assembled based on a report of Zohran Mamdani’s plan to reduce funds for police in favor of “intervention” teams for the community. The intervention agents would not be sworn officers, bound by the state and U.S. constitutions, but would be sent in a twilight zone of poorly-defined authority and powers to “intervene” in, precisely, instances of mental unwellness (e.g., emotionally disturbed persons) as well as domestic conflict, potential child endangerment, and so forth.

    It merits mention that Mamdani’s plan for a “Community Safety” department with the police, focused on “mental health,” is a classic move of aspiring collectivism. The more it’s empowered – without the lawful limitations of sworn-officer policing – the more community safety will be enlarged to make more things a matter of “mental health.”

    Complaints about deficiencies of mental health in the public would increasingly be coming for everyone. Having the police department operating in a twilight zone as regards the lawful obligations of sworn officers would facilitate that. “Defunding the police” has, from the beginning, been about setting non-sworn officers loose on the public, and thereby fudging the boundaries of law that the sworn-officer police are not allowed to transgress. “Community safety” would create a pipeline through which constitutional rights could be violated in the name of mental health as a menace to community safety.

    Mamdani has mirrored the attitudes of Marxist-Leninism closely enough that this shouldn’t be ignored. In the last century, use of declarations against mental health was a tool rampant in the toolkit of successful communist/socialist takeovers. Many dissident Christians and Jews in communist nations had mental health judgments issued against them to give dictatorial governments excuses for mistreatment. [The same was true of others, like gays, opposition politicians, and academics simply exercising freedom of thought. – J.E.]

    This is not a light matter. It contains the basis for falsely making a whole lot of people “mental health” cases in order to limit their rights and control them, through a process that never has to reach an auditable conclusion.

    Her observations on the other topics are, as always, worth reading, although not everyone will be interested in the full menu.

    One caveat: the post was written before the latest murder by the clearly mentally ill trans shooter, so a few of her comments in re gun control are out of date.

    I’ve written before, though it’s been quite a while, about attempts to leverage mental-health premises and the proposal for mandates to categorically limit the right to bear arms. The effort is not to identify individuals on the presumption that such a designation requires rigorous standards, applied individually, and the protection of rights is the goal to deviate from. Rather, it’s to declare “guns” a mental-health issue and an inherent threat to society on that basis, and normalize declaring whole categories of people ineligible to own firearms, and classify them prejudicially for that purpose.

    Hardly anyone poses that risk to society. There’s no demographic class whose propensity justifies this kind of use. If any nation on earth demonstrated that, it would be the United States, where gun ownership is pervasive throughout society, yet hardly any gun-involved injuries or deaths are due to mental health pathologies.

    The mental health related killings are still a very minor fraction of the whole, and the vast majority of gun-related injuries are still accidents and suicides, but the mass murders get more attention in the press, even if the Regime Media refuses to acknowledge the causes.

  10. AesopFan,

    Thanks for the quotes above. I guess if I thought more about Mamdami in terms of 1984, I would have caught on to the “community intervention” as a method to declare anyone who disagrees with the government as “mentally incompetent”. Not only did Orwell point this out, but we’ve seen it in action in the Soviet Union and in China. Classic Marxist ploy.

  11. I also thank AesopFan for the J.E. Dyer quotes. The FBI under the previous administration already labeled Catholic traditionalists as threats to the state. How many conservatives of all kinds could be stuffed into a “mental health” box as a danger to the state?

  12. As a further example of the use of “mental health” to enforce compliance with progressive diktats, consider the policy under consideration by the Temecula Valley Unified School District in California. The policy (apparently tabled for now by the school board) stipulates that any girl who does not wish to share a bathroom or locker room with a transgender girl (that is, a biological male), must complete a Mental Health Accommodation Request Form to use a private space. In other words, the girl is judged to be mentally ill for wanting a private space free of biological males.

  13. @ Yukon > “must complete a Mental Health Accommodation Request Form to use a private space.”

    We are moving into a new version of “1984” written by Franz Kafka.

    One of the original excuses for allowing transgender students to use the bathrooms of their claimed gender (not their biological sex) was the alleged discomfort they felt because of the discrimination that they were experiencing by being allowed to use the bathrooms at a nurse’s office, or even staff facilities.

    IOW, instead of the trans persons being on some kind of private list (too few to have a register, and certainly not filling out a mental health form), now the greater number of distressed persons have to do that.

  14. @ RigelDog ” … [ I am] so pale that my husband says I make snow look beige.”
    Your husband sounds like a great, clever, funny guy — hopefully a keeper!

  15. Yeah, distraction is a great start to your first, lethal, strike. Oh. Not that? Sorry.

    To be less snarky, there is a location in the escalation before the weapon comes out in which some kind of similar distraction might reduce the temperature.

    “You staring a my girl?” Not that you were but you glanced in that direction and they guy was looking for a fight.

    “I thought she was Lydia Anderson, went to high school with her.”

    Can’t hurt, but long before anybody’s going to call for mental health distraction professionals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics