As the sun quickly sets, not on the British Empire – that’s already gone – but on Britain itself
It’s not enough to tear down statues. The British pound will be getting a new look.
A generic one.
So instead of past (or present) heroes to be pictured on future British currency, the pound will henceforth feature wildlife. I wasn’t aware that Britain was famous for its wildlife. No one goes big game hunting there anymore.
Here’s the story. The public seems to have voted for this, and the notes will continue to have the monarch’s face on them:
It marks a shift after more than 50 years of showcasing people from Britain’s history on the banknotes, including Winston Churchill, Alan Turing and Jane Austen.
The Bank of England said the change to wildlife imagery creates an opportunity to celebrate another important aspect of the nation.
It also makes it more difficult for the notes to be counterfeited while making security features more distinguishable, according to the central bank.
I don’t think the change in image theme itself makes the notes more difficult to counterfeit, I think it’s improved techniques connected with the issuance of new notes.
The vote went like this:
The move follows a consultation in which the UK wildlife theme received the highest proportion of nominations, at 60%.
Architecture and landmarks was a close second at 56%, followed by notable historical figures (38%) arts, culture and sport (30%) innovation (23%) and noteworthy milestones (19%).
Obviously, people were allowed to choose more than one theme. The total number of responses was 44,000, which isn’t all that many.
The definition of “wildlife” is broad, however:
A second consultation will be run this summer to gather views on the specific wildlife they would like to feature, which can include plants, landscapes and animals.
So they could choose the White Cliffs of Dover, for example. That would be kind of nice. Or the dandelion – not so nice. As for fauna, I immediately think of the hedgehog. Looking it up, we see the following:
The island of Great Britain, along with the rest of the archipelago known as the British Isles … contains a relatively small fraction of the world’s wildlife. The biota was severely diminished in the last ice age, and shortly (in geological terms) thereafter was separated from the continent by the English Channel’s formation. Since then, humans have hunted the most dangerous forms (the wolf, the brown bear and the wild boar) to extinction, though domesticated forms such as the dog and the pig remain. The wild boar has subsequently been reintroduced as a meat animal.
How about the English Springer Spaniel? A noble beast:
My English Springer Spaniel and I vote with you, Neo!
The way the trend is going, I’m thinking Gorse has gotta be a candidate.
For England? A goose seems appropriate.
Springer spaniels are fine dogs for upland bird hunting (pheasants, grouse, woodcock). There are two categories of dogs in this group, flushing dogs like Springers, that get the bird to take wing, and pointing dogs, which point the bird for the hunter, who then walks up to flush the bird. I favor pointing dogs myself, German shorthaired pointers.
It is a cardinal sin to shoot a bird on the ground; it is called wing-shooting, invented by the Brits in the 1700s, which is why the finest shotguns were first made in Britain. A matched pair of Holland & Holland or Westley Richards shotguns cost $100,000 or more today. With beautiful Turkish walnut wood stocks and fine, fine engraving. These guns literally have to fit the shooter. like a pair of fine boots.
That photo looks just like Spencer, my family’s English Springer Spaniel – named so as it was Winston Churchill’s middle name. He was a very good dog. Thanks for the memories.
But dogs are not halal.
That is especially so in Great Britain.
King Charlie is probably appalled by Welsh Corgis and English bulldogs to say nothing of foxhounds, Jack Russel terriers, or Springer spaniels.
@Disguested:named so as it was Winston Churchill’s middle name
Leonard was his middle name. Spencer-Churchill was his family name. Don’t know that he used “Leonard” much. He published as Winston Spencer Churchill so he’d not be confused for the bestselling American author Winston Churchill, who appears to be nearly forgotten today. And this almost sounds like a Monty Python joke (“Charles Dikkens with two K’s, the well-known Dutch author.”)