Fascism must be fought everywhere, by all means necessary and wth all possible tools weapons…especially that of taking over our country (for its own sake, of course)…
Almost everything that’s happening the Western world politically can be accurately looked at as a manifestation of a single underlying theme. The details vary, of course, and there is always other local stuff mixed in, but the over theme is the same from America to Canada to Germany to Britain to etc.
That theme is an entrenched West-wide ruling political/economic/social elite struggling to retain control in the face of rising opposition. The current ruling class of the West is globalist, hyper-secular, dislikes their own ancestral culture, sees nationalism as (at best) vulgar and old-fashioned, and controls the heights of government, business, and culture.
But all over the West they are being challenged by ‘populist’ movements of many sorts, and the very tactics the ruling class uses to try to put down a given uprising tends to reinforce the overall movement. I’ve lost count of how many times a given electoral defeat or other setback for the rebellion was lauded in the media as ‘the populists have peaked’, only to see them resurge immediately.
There have been many periods like this in the past. FDR was the focal point of the last rising against a former ruling elite in the USA, and the hatred and tension was just as strong then. Before that, the Civil War terminated the dominance of the elite that had ruled the USA for the previous several decades.
One thing that is a little different this time is that before, the elite/rebel struggles were usually mostly contained within a nation-state (though they often happened at about the same time, it’s no coincidence (IMHO) that the unification of Italy, the unification of Germany, and the American Civil War all happened within a relatively short period.
Today, though, the post-WWII ruling elite is a single social, cultural, and economic class that is spread across the West. That does affect the dynamic.
The extreme measures we’re seeing from the ruling class to suppress the rebellion are not marks of power and confidence. They’re marks of nervous fear that they’re about to be displaced.
Are there any indications that there might be artificial structures on the Moon?
Astronauts who have traveled to the Moon, orbited around it, and set foot on it have said that they have seen strange, anomalous things in the course of their journeys, things which NASA has made it clear they were not to talk about in open communications.
Moreover, there are sections (sometimes large sections) of some of the detailed pictures which NASA has taken of the Moon which are strangely blurred out.
There have also been reports by a few insiders that NASA routinely removes or just never releases images that it’s cameras catch that we are not allowed to see.
A recent two part series of Ross Coulthart’s show “Reality Check” features Theoretical Physicist, Dr. Maaneli “Max” Derakhsani, and his exploration of NASA’s treatment of some of these anomalous things.
Dr. Deakhsani prefaces his discussion and analysis with quotes from Dr. Carl Sagan.
In a 1963 paper entitled, “Direct Contact Among Galactic Civilizations by Relativistic Interstellar Spaceflight,” which appeared in “Planetary and Space Science, 1963; 11: 485-98, Sagan wrote that statistics cited in his paper suggest that “the Earth has been visited by various galactic civilizations many times (possibly 10,000)” during geological time,” and that evidence of some of these visits might still exist in our Solar System.
Moreover, that, it is not out of the question that “artifacts of these visits still exist” or even that “some kind of (automated) base” might be maintained within our Solar System, and that because of it’s lack of weathering and human interference, the Moon (and especially it’s back side) might be a good place to look for such evidence.
I’ve always thought of NASA as a civilian agency as opposed to the Department of War.
But, Dr. Derakhsani next goes on to quote chapter and verse from the legislation which established NASA to point out that it was and is part of the National Defense establishment, under the jurisdiction/direction of both the DOW and the President, and that it was explicitly allowed to withhold information on the basis of National Security.
Dr. Derakhsani then goes on to explore and illustrate several instances in which NASA seems to be withholding what could possibly be evidence of such visitations.*
New post: Worthwhile Reading…and Thoughts Inspired by the Same
I respond to the assertion, which I’ve seen made frequently lately: “Authoritarianism has *never* prevented technological innovation. Why would you need Democracy to work on battery chemistry?”
”Are there any indications that there might be artificial structures on the Moon?”
No. None.
”Moreover, there are sections (sometimes large sections) of some of the detailed pictures which NASA has taken of the Moon which are strangely blurred out.”
That’s not true, but even if it were, so what? As I told you a few weeks ago when you posted this nonsense, NASA is not the only agency to have sent spacecraft to the moon. Russia, China, Europe, Japan, India, Israel, and South Korea have all sent cameras to orbit the moon, as have the private companies Intuitive Machines, Firefly, and iSpace. Russia, China, India, and Japan have all also successfully landed on the moon, as has the private company Firefly.
If you want, you can send your own camera to the moon for a few million dollars. For a few million more you can land it on the surface. No one who has done so has ever found an alien structure on the moon.
That’s because there aren’t any.
mkent–I love your touching faith in our public institutions and scientific establishment.
”I love your touching faith in our public institutions and scientific establishment.”
What you won’t admit is that “our public institutions and scientific establishment” are not the only the ones who have sent cameras to the moon. Lots of countries, including our enemies and neutrals we have no control over, have done so. So have private companies.
You could send one yourself if you so desired. You could prove everyone else wrong and become rich and famous in the process. So why don’t you?
Leave a Reply
HTML tags allowed in your
comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
Fascism must be fought everywhere, by all means necessary and wth all possible
toolsweapons…especially that of taking over our country (for its own sake, of course)…https://www.zerohedge.com/political/german-public-broadcaster-ran-fake-ai-generated-clip-ice-troops-arresting-migrant-family
+ Bonus:
“DON SURBER: The Ironic Curtain: Europeans who lived under communism hate it. Those spared pursue it.”—
https://instapundit.com/777191/
Pretty sure it’s just Blue State anti-Trump protests ALONG WITH expressions of compassion and solidarity with their friends and allies…
“WE’RE LIVING IN A PARODY”—
https://instapundit.com/777186/
Garbage Piles Up in Havana as Trump Says Rubio is Talking to Cuba.”—
https://instapundit.com/777051/
Snake Clowns.
Almost everything that’s happening the Western world politically can be accurately looked at as a manifestation of a single underlying theme. The details vary, of course, and there is always other local stuff mixed in, but the over theme is the same from America to Canada to Germany to Britain to etc.
That theme is an entrenched West-wide ruling political/economic/social elite struggling to retain control in the face of rising opposition. The current ruling class of the West is globalist, hyper-secular, dislikes their own ancestral culture, sees nationalism as (at best) vulgar and old-fashioned, and controls the heights of government, business, and culture.
But all over the West they are being challenged by ‘populist’ movements of many sorts, and the very tactics the ruling class uses to try to put down a given uprising tends to reinforce the overall movement. I’ve lost count of how many times a given electoral defeat or other setback for the rebellion was lauded in the media as ‘the populists have peaked’, only to see them resurge immediately.
There have been many periods like this in the past. FDR was the focal point of the last rising against a former ruling elite in the USA, and the hatred and tension was just as strong then. Before that, the Civil War terminated the dominance of the elite that had ruled the USA for the previous several decades.
One thing that is a little different this time is that before, the elite/rebel struggles were usually mostly contained within a nation-state (though they often happened at about the same time, it’s no coincidence (IMHO) that the unification of Italy, the unification of Germany, and the American Civil War all happened within a relatively short period.
Today, though, the post-WWII ruling elite is a single social, cultural, and economic class that is spread across the West. That does affect the dynamic.
The extreme measures we’re seeing from the ruling class to suppress the rebellion are not marks of power and confidence. They’re marks of nervous fear that they’re about to be displaced.
Are there any indications that there might be artificial structures on the Moon?
Astronauts who have traveled to the Moon, orbited around it, and set foot on it have said that they have seen strange, anomalous things in the course of their journeys, things which NASA has made it clear they were not to talk about in open communications.
Moreover, there are sections (sometimes large sections) of some of the detailed pictures which NASA has taken of the Moon which are strangely blurred out.
There have also been reports by a few insiders that NASA routinely removes or just never releases images that it’s cameras catch that we are not allowed to see.
A recent two part series of Ross Coulthart’s show “Reality Check” features Theoretical Physicist, Dr. Maaneli “Max” Derakhsani, and his exploration of NASA’s treatment of some of these anomalous things.
Dr. Deakhsani prefaces his discussion and analysis with quotes from Dr. Carl Sagan.
In a 1963 paper entitled, “Direct Contact Among Galactic Civilizations by Relativistic Interstellar Spaceflight,” which appeared in “Planetary and Space Science, 1963; 11: 485-98, Sagan wrote that statistics cited in his paper suggest that “the Earth has been visited by various galactic civilizations many times (possibly 10,000)” during geological time,” and that evidence of some of these visits might still exist in our Solar System.
Moreover, that, it is not out of the question that “artifacts of these visits still exist” or even that “some kind of (automated) base” might be maintained within our Solar System, and that because of it’s lack of weathering and human interference, the Moon (and especially it’s back side) might be a good place to look for such evidence.
I’ve always thought of NASA as a civilian agency as opposed to the Department of War.
But, Dr. Derakhsani next goes on to quote chapter and verse from the legislation which established NASA to point out that it was and is part of the National Defense establishment, under the jurisdiction/direction of both the DOW and the President, and that it was explicitly allowed to withhold information on the basis of National Security.
Dr. Derakhsani then goes on to explore and illustrate several instances in which NASA seems to be withholding what could possibly be evidence of such visitations.*
* See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOmrBWjyUtc
New post: Worthwhile Reading…and Thoughts Inspired by the Same
I respond to the assertion, which I’ve seen made frequently lately: “Authoritarianism has *never* prevented technological innovation. Why would you need Democracy to work on battery chemistry?”
https://chicagoboyz.net/archives/76143.html
“Four more years!” – President Trump celebrates the 100th Black History Month with a celebration – 02/18/26 Video
https://commoncts.blogspot.com/2026/02/four-more-years-president-trump.html
”Are there any indications that there might be artificial structures on the Moon?”
No. None.
”Moreover, there are sections (sometimes large sections) of some of the detailed pictures which NASA has taken of the Moon which are strangely blurred out.”
That’s not true, but even if it were, so what? As I told you a few weeks ago when you posted this nonsense, NASA is not the only agency to have sent spacecraft to the moon. Russia, China, Europe, Japan, India, Israel, and South Korea have all sent cameras to orbit the moon, as have the private companies Intuitive Machines, Firefly, and iSpace. Russia, China, India, and Japan have all also successfully landed on the moon, as has the private company Firefly.
If you want, you can send your own camera to the moon for a few million dollars. For a few million more you can land it on the surface. No one who has done so has ever found an alien structure on the moon.
That’s because there aren’t any.
mkent–I love your touching faith in our public institutions and scientific establishment.
”I love your touching faith in our public institutions and scientific establishment.”
What you won’t admit is that “our public institutions and scientific establishment” are not the only the ones who have sent cameras to the moon. Lots of countries, including our enemies and neutrals we have no control over, have done so. So have private companies.
You could send one yourself if you so desired. You could prove everyone else wrong and become rich and famous in the process. So why don’t you?