Home » The sublime Suzanne Farrell in 1966: “Concerto Barocco”

Comments

The sublime Suzanne Farrell in 1966: “Concerto Barocco” — 17 Comments

  1. I was in college in the early 1960s and remember seeing her on the cover of Time or Newsweek (iirc). She was absolutely gorgeous. If she hadn’t wasted all that time dancing, she could have been a famous model.

  2. neo: More seriously, what makes Balanchine special? The gay New York poets I used to read went on about him.

    From search I can see you’ve covered a number of Balanchine performances.

  3. huxley:

    You know, I can take up that question, but the answer’s long. Maybe in another post some time.

    The summary answer is this: (1) if you saw ballet before and after Balanchine, you’d know. He changed a great deal; really revolutionary. (2) he used music in a very different way, and wasn’t afraid of music (like Bach, for example, in this piece) that was not previously thought to be suitable for ballet (3) he was extremely prolific over a very long time and the quality of the work was high, although there were some forgettable ones as well (4) he had an eye for spotting and training talented dancers

  4. Neo, I noticed the tempo of the first movement is slower than I’m used to hearing (typically vivace or high end molto allegro) and wonder whether this is of necessity or simply choice? As I don’t know dance I can’t say whether higher speed is possible or otherwise somehow too frenetic or some such? Or on the other hand doable enough but merely rejected for aesthetic reasons of the director/choreographer’s purpose? It’s beautiful to be sure — just tarrying where my imaging-ear is expecting a livelier progress.

  5. neo: Thanks.

    That’s a good start. If you want to write more sometime, I’d like to read it.

  6. As I recall, Edward Gorey, the illustrator (I guess one can’t say cartoonist) of those unique and marvelously morbid, old-fashioned little books, was a big Balanchine fan. He was also roommates with Frank O’Hara, my favorite New York School poet, while at Harvard in the 50s.

    However, apparently I’m thinking of Edwin Denby, a dance critic and New York poet. Also one of those people who knew *everyone*, at least in art circles.

    Here’s a fine article on Denby and Balanchine, excerpting what he said about “Concerto Barocco”:

    In a 1945 review of ”Concerto Barocco,” set to Bach’s Concerto for Two Violins in D minor, Denby writes, ”In its vigorous dance rhythm, its long-linked phrases, its consistent drive and sovereign articulation, ‘Concerto Barocco’ corresponds brilliantly to this masterpiece of Baroque music.” Gifted with a rare ability to describe dance moments in nontechnical language, Denby says of the couple dancing the adagio: ”Then at the culminating phrase, from her greatest height he very slowly lowers her. You watch her body slowly descend, her foot and leg pointing stiffly downward, till her toe reaches the floor and she rests her full weight at last on this single sharp point and pauses. It is the effect at that moment of a deliberate and powerful plunge into a wound, and the emotion of it answers strangely to the musical stress.”

    “The Man Who Understood Balanchine”
    https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/98/11/08/bookend/bookend.html

    Edwin Denby died in 1983 at the age of 80. He might have seen Suzanne Farrell in 1966.

  7. Whatever else one might say of Balanchine, he left some memorable quotes, though not always in tune with the 21st Century.

    In my ballets, woman is first. Men are consorts. God made men to sing the praises of women. They are not equal to men: They are better.
    ______________________________________________

    Someone once said that dancers work just as hard as policeman, always alert, always tense. But I don’t agree with that because policeman don’t have to look beautiful at the same time.
    ______________________________________________

    Put a man and a girl on stage and there is already a story; a man and two girls, there’s already a plot.
    ______________________________________________

    Choreography is simpler than you think. Just go and do, and don’t think so much about it. Just make something interesting.

    https://www.azquotes.com/author/819-George_Balanchine

    The last, so far as I can tell, is the secret to creativity.

  8. The cascade of arched bodies at 7:50 really caught my eye. It’s visually very striking, and reminds a bit more of modern dance rather than ballet. Plus, there is the usual element of story telling in most dance which I’m often not very good at discerning. (Perhaps because I like to just concentrate on the lines and motion by themselves.)

    But that dance element didn’t seem like any conventional story telling element. It conveys strength and power. It’s almost like a massive bridge abutment that supports a glorious tower.

  9. I have to stand up for Ukrainians. Vindman is giving them all a bad name.

    https://www.facebook.com/USNavy/posts/111628215526802

    “The Distinguished Flying Cross was presented to the widow of Lt. Miroslav “Steve” Zilberman yesterday. The E-2C Hawkeye pilot of VAW 121 pilot ordered his crew to bail out after engine failure, enabling three others in the plane to escape as he manually kept the Hawkeye stable. Rest in Peace, Lieutenant. ”

    I wish I could find the citation. The wikipededia makes things prettier.

    Zilberman held things together so his crew could bail out. How he had the strength to fly that E-2 I’ll never know. He knew he was going to die. He had everything to live for.

    Fun fact. The E-2 is such a valuable aircraft, the Navy puts its best pilots into them. They don’t like it, but it’s a fact.
    Fun fact II: I’m an honorary Hormel Hawg. VAW-114.

  10. My wife and I were avid regulars to the NYC Ballet at Lincoln Center in the late 90’s and early 00’s. Put it on your bucket list of things to do. It is akin to watching professional ice hockey on television versus being there at lower level center ice. There is nothing quite like it. Monochrome YouTube videos don’t do it justice.

  11. Thanks.
    I also appreciated what you wrote about Balanchine. Although I’m no expert, I always thought of him as a transitional figure. A lot of Balanchine looks like “classical ballet” to me, but the actual motions are new, not from the classical canon. Yet it “looks right”.

    I also see a very modern approaches to groups, and to abstract motion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>