Germany and the New Year’s Eve attacks: Merkel tries to offer some solutions
Now that the New Year’s Eve attacks in Cologne and other parts of Western Europe have become publicized, there have been some glimmerings of an attempt in Germany to crack down at least a bit (or what passes in Germany for cracking down these days). Yesterday it was announced that Merkel’s government has suggested some changes in Germany’s sexual assault laws:
At present the courts can only order deportations when criminals are given custodial sentences of at least three years. The legal changes would allow deportations to go ahead for people given suspended sentences or jail-terms as short as one year, as well as for offenders aged under 18.
However, even those small changes may be hard to implement, because in Germany such deportation is only legal “to a limited range of states and only if the home country government agrees and the convicted person has travel documents.” This could easily rule out most of the refugees. And of course, it’s only an after-the-fact remedy: a crime must be committed first, and a perpetrator successfully identified and prosecuted. How often will that be happening, how many women will be sacrificed first, and how much money will be spent in an increased police presence?
Over one million asylum seekers arrived in Germany last year, and Merkel so far refuses to allow Germany to impose its own further limits, but insists on an EU-wide solution “through redistributing refugees inside the bloc, tighter external EU frontier controls and a deal with Turkey to reduce inflows from the Middle East.” Meanwhile, the newcomers continue to arrive.
This article (by David A. Martin, an international law professor at the U. of Virginia, and not a conservative) suggests that Merkel and Germany might have considered a “refugee” system (instead of an asylum system, which is what they have now), whereby would-be immigrants to Germany were vetted in Turkey and other Muslim countries where they had taken shelter in the camps there before being allowed into Germany. That’s more or less our own system at present; not that it’s so great, or that effective vetting is so very possible. But it’s also the case that in Europe, the refugees began to arrive by sea in droves without being vetted, and apparently there are laws there against merely turning them back, laws that originated when such arrivals were relatively rare. The laws have yet to be adapted to the present very-changed circumstances:
…[A] quota resettlement program, even if desirable, would not do much to rein in the current unruly flow, in part because European law, as construed by the European Court of Human Rights [ECHR], will not permit maritime interdiction or other blocking measures needed to discourage spontaneous asylum seekers…
Decisions from the ECHR over the last few years…have taken a strikingly inflexible stand against maritime interdiction or other barriers to access by asylum seekers. The human rights logic of these rulings holds considerable appeal on first glance. But they have never been tested on anything like the current scale…At some point there are inescapable capacity limits. And if anti-immigrant parties come to power, there may be far wider damage to the overall human rights structure within Europe, including withdrawals from ECHR jurisdiction.
Let’s pause for a moment to ponder the assertion in that very last sentence. “Overall human rights” would be damaged by anti-immigrant parties? Seems to me there’s more threat to German (and/or European) human rights from continuing to allow the entry of a large number of unvetted immigrants from countries where many of the people appear to have little or no respect for human rights.
The author continues:
…I]t is not beyond the realm of possibility that the Court, now chastened by the magnitude of the recent flow and cognizant of the risks exposed by the Paris attacks, might construe its earlier rulings to find room for carefully executed access restrictions.
On reading this, I feel gratitude for the fact that (so far) this country is not bound by the ECHR and its rulings. I have little doubt that we would be, however, if Obama and the left had their way.
Though obviously in denial, Merkel is courting Mussolini’s fate.
The invasion of Europe will split apart the EU and will lead to widespread vigilantism. The nationalist parties will come to the forefront and sweep away the multi – cultural suicide movement. Its going to get uglier fast. The same will occur here. Its all a matter of how many assaults and murders are required to reach the tipping point.
Merkel is getting flack on her proposals from lefties. It’s really hard to tread a path between average people and the media and the political Gutmenschen.
As we watch this fiasco unfold, our 2nd Amendment rights grow in wisdom and value. The Europeans have been invaded and are unable to defend themselves from the barbarians.
Anybody remember Gordon Brown’s hot mic after talking–ostensibly with concern–to a normal Brit concerned about crime? Not only was he a bastard, he was in a car with an armed guard going to a home protected by armed guards. he didn’t have to worry.
Merkel &Co always believe they’ll be okay. So do their hangers-on.
Remember how the Chattering Classes marginalized and demonized the victims of Waco and Ruby Ridge? Yeah, that. They don’t care what happens to the Lower Orders, who probably deserve it. Whatever their first language, they’re all the same class.
European Court of Human Rights. That’s a good one.
Meanwhile in Poland last month:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hakb6S0IpgY
I expect this to spread throughout Europe but I could be wrong.
How often will that be happening, how many women will be sacrificed first, and how much money will be spent in an increased police presence?
sorry… its patriarchal oppression to protect women..
heck… you never covered the paper that said holding doors was sexist, and not holding them was sexist as well!!!
here is a list of male privileges..
https://xyfeminist.wordpress.com/the-male-privilege-list/
there are 77 things on that list for women to get angry at men for being men…
Feminist Denounces Patriarchal Oppressors Who Protected Women During Aurora Shooting
https://sayanythingblog.com/entry/feminist-denounces-patriarchal-oppressors-who-protected-women-during-aurora-shooting/
Perhaps Rosin would feel more comfortable if the men in question had behaved like this guy, who fled the theater leaving his girlfriend and her children behind.
heck.. when women tally up the 200,000 dollar salary a houswife should get, they dont deduct the body guard job the men have..
Women do not need patriarchal protection
http://www.thealternative.in/lifestyle/women-do-not-need-patriarchal-protection/
traits of benevolent patriarchy – another long list, but this is the related point
Women need to be protected. This approach is appealing to women who want to divide labor, including the woman taking less responsibility outside the home and the man taking more responsibility for financially supporting the family. It also appeals to some women who like to feel protected or who equate protection with masculine love. We are even told that Heavenly Mother, presumably a goddess, needs to be protected which is why we don’t mention her.
now why would you protect these victims who hate you for doing so? i know the women here who are older would think not protecting them was bad… but these older women arent the men who are going to get killed, maimed, beaten for the sake of protecting someone who will then consider them what?
women can now be rangers in special forces, they can protect themselves… no reason to protect someone that hates you for all that…
of course the problem is you cant have it both ways, and thanks to feminism, and its pushing men out of the family, hating them, their roles and so on… islam is now the fastest growing religion
oh.. and if you read papers on matriarchies. gangs of men roving around raping and beating women and others is the norm for a matriarchy, just as women go in groups and dont go out at night in such. in other words, a matriarhy is all the heckish stuff that these same women claimed their western modern society is!!! not what it has become
most people would be amazed at what they have been supporting, even by just not opposing and what they say, want, push for, and define…
it was their idea to do the multicultural thing, remove their protection, and so on..
there is no fixing such and it certainly is not worth risking life for people who will belittle your saving them as your casket is lowered in the grave for doing it (as in aurora)
here is a good article on dems, feminists, and their silence
Muslim Rape Gangs Attack Women, and Feminists Won’t Say a Word About It
http://theothermccain.com/2016/01/05/muslim-rape-gangs-attack-women-and-feminists-wont-say-a-word-about-it/
The Larger Motive Behind the Groping Jihad | Gates of Vienna
http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/01/the-larger-motive-behind-the-groping-jihad/
In other words, Silvester night was a probe. Islam targeted the enemy’s most vulnerable and valuable property: its young women. The nature of the enemy’s response will inform the subsequent actions of the invading organism.
are they sufficiently neutered by feminists that they wont protect the women, like brits, swedes, and others dont any more?
a commenter points out
and this very interesting piece detailing the silence:
Why are feminists refusing to discuss the Cologne sex attacks?
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/01/why-are-feminists-refusing-to-discuss-the-cologne-sex-attacks/
“So bored of racists who only pretend to care about women’s rights when they see an opportunity to bash Muslims.” Laurie Penny’s Twitter feed
Germany Proves That “Rape Culture” Is Merely A Political Weapon Against Western Men
http://www.returnofkings.com/77129/germany-proves-that-rape-culture-is-merely-a-political-weapon-against-western-men
“rape culture” is nothing more than a political weapon to harm and marginalize Western men. It has nothing to do with keeping women safe and everything to do with emasculating Western men…..
Immigrants and refugees can quite literally roam the streets and grab whichever German woman they want without getting criticized by politicians while a woman who falsely claimed to have been raped in a dorm room by a German man (ironically enough) gets invited by an American Congressman to the State Of The Union address. Welcome to insanity.
German Feminists: Forget Rapist Migrants, They’re Already Marginalised
http://www.teaparty.org/german-feminists-forget-rapist-migrants-theyre-already-marginalised-138140/
“People are insisting on making this a political story, trying to shift the focus on pro or anti refugees. But in fact, no one is listening to what we have to say — the women — who suffered from this violence in the streets on a daily basis long before refugees even came here,” the activist told DW yesterday
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
the men will ignore it as they lose either way they decide to act. if they dont act and are seen then they are bad for not protecting, if they do act, then they are bad for being racists..
so they are dropping out.. (mgtow?)..
best they can hope for is to be far away playing a game or something (but the feminists are yelling about that too… too much sexism in games)
to quote the trite movie War Games
“the only way to win is not to play”
The female chauvinists have blood on their hands, and it doesn’t stop with the brutality of abortion rites. Apparently, progressive morality did not prepare the European women for sexual relations with high capacity mobs of imported alien men. Also, there are insufficient Planned Parenthood offices to abort and/or cannibalize an exploding population.
Unfortunately, a refugee crisis, and, in fact, a global humanitarian disaster, was inevitable when the terrorists defeated the combined resources of The United States of America, Germany, etc. Only the Russians are left standing to reestablish peace and order in the Middle East, North Africa, and Eurasia, and curtail the progress of a mass uprooting of native peoples, and save the Europeans and Americans from themselves and anti-native policies perpetrated by their representatives.
The female chauvinists asks not who your country will abort for you, but who you will abort for your country… and a green environment.
Abort for a green environment and climate stasis.
“there may be far wider damage to the overall human rights structure within Europe, including withdrawals from ECHR jurisdiction.”
In my opinion people who uses arguments like that are in reality the gravediggers of “Human Rights”. They created an artificial and mainly fictional system which they then used to clobber and vilify their opponents. It is nothing but a tool to destroy that which it pretends to protect. So like the Left.
“I feel gratitude for the fact that (so far) this country is not bound by the ECHR and its rulings.”
Are you sure about that? I know that strictly speaking you aren’t bound to it but the ECHR is nothing but a text, like your Constitution. The similarity between them is that texts have to be interpreted and when words lose their meaning and can be twisted beyond recognition … The only thing which can protect is the underlying culture and that “Culture” has taken quit a beating in the last 50 years.
As an example I would say your Public Education system where the ACLU and likewise organizations (like FFR) have all but destroyed the common ground needed for such a system to function (*). And they did that on the basis of the First Amendment.
(*) Logically the only common ground there still is is “nothing”, nihilism, and you can’t build anything on that.
Various places querying “where were the men” on NYE in Cologne. Speculation includes that the guys routinely partied someplace where there weren’t so many young women partying. That one didn’t get many votes.
Or that Germany has finally raised an entire generation of men without chests.
Some responses were telling. Would you jump in to protect women? Family and friends, yes. Others, hell no. They voted for this, let them enjoy it. Point being the presumption that a disproportionate number of women voted for politicians and thus for policies obviously leading to this state.
No chests, and resentment among those who retain them at the additional risk they’re expected to undergo on behalf of those who voted for this. Not good.
And about Germany. Reading the articles on different sites I’m struck with the sudden loss of memory people seem to have. Do people really forget that a few years back UK-Labour admitted that they had flooded the UK with immigrants for electoral and social-engineering reasons. That France has millions of muslim immigrants from its ex-colonies and has covered up the problems (like the no-go zones). That, to take my own country as an example, +25 years back there was a government commissioner, appointed to provide solutions to the immigration (criminality) problem, who declared that a) “The ‘natives’ shouldn’t be so racist”, b) “No assimilation but integration” and c) “We need immigrants for our pensions”, d) … Sounds familiar? And that was +25 years before Merkel. (*)
Now don’t get me wrong. As far as I’m concerned Merkel and consorts should be executed for treason. But as a person she is but one in a long line of traitors.
But what gives me hope, a bit, is that the situation in Germany is causing a reaction and a rising opposition. And that is more than I can say about the rest of Western-Europe (that is with the exclusion of the ex-communist countries).
(*) As for the USA. I remember reading an article, published when Reagan was president, that the number of illegals crossing the Mexican border into the USA was around one million per year.
Ps. As an observation, we always seem to speak about the role of the government but governments are but an instrument. The problem is the debasement and treason of the intellectual class it comes from and the indifference of the general population. And that is a cultural phenomenon, the real problem causing everything else.
Create the problem, then offer a solution to the problem. Sounds familiar.
The problem is the debasement and treason of the intellectual class it comes from and the indifference of the general population.
Here’s one treatment for the traitors.
http://grimbeorn.blogspot.com/2016/01/why-would-anyone-need-50-caliber.html
Phil D Says: As an example I would say your Public Education system where the ACLU and likewise organizations (like FFR) have all but destroyed the common ground needed for such a system to function (*). And they did that on the basis of the First Amendment.
actually no… they did it with TITLE IX a law specifically targeting men under the auspices of a more equal just feminist society.
How Title IX Destroyed One Small College’s Athletics Programs
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/15279/
to condense.. the author used to run “10 1,000-meter repeats at a 5:15-mile pace” but now ” I played FIFA Soccer 12 on my roommate’s Xbox while eating half a box of Oreos”
note that they did not build more colleges or schools, they had to dump men to make room for women – which is why i could not go to college after bronx science… nor a bunch of my classmates… get rid of the high iq high performance males with no connection to alumni, and voila, women outperform men.
This year marks the 44h anniversary of the adoption of Title IX, which requires “gender equity” in higher education.
[edited for length by n-n]
Richard Aubrey Says: Various places querying “where were the men” on NYE in Cologne. Speculation includes that the guys routinely partied someplace where there weren’t so many young women partying. That one didn’t get many votes.
actually, when you understand HOW the incidents happen and are constructed, you may realize why, even if there are men there, there is nothing they can do (though doing anything will get you put in jail if you do help as that would be a hate crime worse than the speech laws which will also get you arrested if you say, “muslims raping my wife is bad”)
The term for it is Taharrush
[rape has been used for centuries as a means of controlling men by hurting their families, but now that the men are mostly not in families, its just hurting the passive power base of the country… who will cave as they are currently doing in an effort to appease what cant be appeased]
police in Berlin, Hamburg, Bielefeld, Frankfurt, Dé¼sseldorf and Stuttgart have reported of similar incidents. In addition, police in Vienna and Salzburg in Austria and Zurich in Switzerland have raised the alarm about similar mass assaults
Allow the feminist borg in, and voila…
[yes, the borg are feminist. the leader is a woman searching for a man (piccard), they do not have sex, they are equal, etc… They represent the end result. Just as the klingons are exagerated vikings, etc]
now isnt it funny that the communist states where this brand of feminism started and was nurtured and then exported wont allow it in their country?
‘Feminist 5’ Arrests Warning for China’s Feminists
In China, feminism made strides for many years when other types of political discourse was discouraged. But now the government is methodically isolating independent voices. This time there is no special pass for women.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
She says they are suffering recurrent nightmares, are forbidden to speak to the press or to travel without permission. “I don’t think they have income,” Feng said in a recent phone interview. “Their cellphones were not returned to them so they cannot communicate. They need friendship but they cannot have any work or social opportunity.”
when it was good to pretend its ok so that the west adopts it, they let it grow a bit, now they are erasing them slowly.. its even funnier to read the western articles on how this represents steps backwards and so on… (as if the communist party has a direction other than its own desires)
lots of other ex soviet states really dont allow it much and russia cracks down on them for their debasing things like churches and so forth..
only the US lets them destroy things and says thats great… (and other western states coordinated to the same rules)
Richard Aubrey,
I’ve heard the rumors about what he had said and so forth, along with the Blair time. But they’ve been importing in rapists to change their peasant demographics for a long time. Rot was only one of their experiments, after all.
As an example I would say your Public Education system where the ACLU and likewise organizations (like FFR) have all but destroyed the common ground needed for such a system to function (*). And they did that on the basis of the First Amendment.
The Leftist alliance can be likened to a viral WMD, akin to HIV. It destroys the host systems using the power of the host itself, much as Islam did so using American technology on 9/11. Western technology, even.
Attempting to use the Constitution to de fang the Leftist alliance is like attempting to use a host’s immune system to de fang HIV, after HIV has already taken over the majority of the host’s immune system.
Islam is very similar, but its virulence and spread is far greater than the Leftist alliance, who were in fact born from Soviet KGB weapon labs.
The Leftist alliance has mutated from their original viral and WMD specifications. They were designed to target and weaken one system, the Western civilization, not any other. That is why they are so fanatically focused on the West, not any other culture or nation or government.
Islam, however, was created under different circumstances and they are designed to annihilate, consume, and enslave any culture or religion or nation. The Leftist alliance and Islamic Jihad are both enemies of humanity.
They deserve no mercy, no consideration, no protection. They deserve nothing but what they do deserve.
“Islam is very similar, but its virulence and spread is far greater than the Leftist alliance, who were in fact born from Soviet KGB weapon labs.”
I put it this way, islam has children.
A clarification on the previous. To explain what that was all about.
https://ymarsakar.wordpress.com/2016/01/13/yuri-bezmenov-defector-from-the-kgb-twice-again/
The details about the Leftist alliance’s origins as a WMD viral weapon designed to destroy Western civilization is present in that interview, more or less.
Other people have called it Communist/Marxist/KGB Demoralization. That’s only the first stage.
The Soviets thought that all these Leftists in the US would be terminated, a viral weapon with a strictly limited shelf life, allowing the Soviets to “take over” more directly. The Soviets died off first, strangely enough, leaving their weapons free to mutate and take on a life of their own. The “termination” mechanic didn’t activate.
We have to activate it ourselves using the power of Death. That is one of the only powers in existence that exceeds and overrides the Left’s power.
After all, what did people get for Underestimating the Power of the Leftist alliance? Perhaps they need a better lesson on that still.