Even Sabrina Rubin Erdely and Stephen Glass combined couldn’t make this stuff up.
Comments
You can’t make this stuff up — 3 Comments
A completely fabricated story with no relation to reality whatsoever but that mightily serves ‘the narrative’ is of far more value than anything that might serve the narrative to a lesser degree. By definition, anything that contradicts the narrative regardless of how factual is ‘untrue’. When and if it needs to, 2+2=5.
The left denies the very possibility of objective truth consequentially, the resultant ‘moral’ calculus proclaims Erdely and her ilk to be the most ‘truthful’ of all.
Utter moral bankruptcy.
“Birds of a feather…”
They simply disregard Truth for some higher pursuit. That one which follows the direction of the heart.
The Rolling Stones Magazine published a sequel to The New York Times’s “all the fiction that a lazy journalist deems fit to print”.
Leave a Reply
HTML tags allowed in your
comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
A completely fabricated story with no relation to reality whatsoever but that mightily serves ‘the narrative’ is of far more value than anything that might serve the narrative to a lesser degree. By definition, anything that contradicts the narrative regardless of how factual is ‘untrue’. When and if it needs to, 2+2=5.
The left denies the very possibility of objective truth consequentially, the resultant ‘moral’ calculus proclaims Erdely and her ilk to be the most ‘truthful’ of all.
Utter moral bankruptcy.
“Birds of a feather…”
They simply disregard Truth for some higher pursuit. That one which follows the direction of the heart.
The Rolling Stones Magazine published a sequel to The New York Times’s “all the fiction that a lazy journalist deems fit to print”.