More revelations that I predict much of America will ignore or applaud: In the wake of the risible Sussman verdict, it has emerged that for the last ten years, the FBI has maintained a “secure work environment” within the offices … Continue reading →
I already wrote a post today on the Sussman acquittal, but I thought I’d give one subtopic its own post as well. It concerns the following, which I read in this piece (hat tip commenter “Barry Meislin”): The jury unanimously … Continue reading →
In a move that should surprise absolutely no one, a jury in DC acquitted Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who had been accused of lying to the FBI. The reason this result is no surprise is because the trial … Continue reading →
This is from two days ago [emphasis mine]: It looks like the FBI top brass kept Hillary Clinton’s campaign identity a secret when it pushed her disinformation to Chicago-based FBI agents investigating ties between Trump and Russia’s Alfa-Bank. That’s according … Continue reading →
Once again, I’m resorting to a roundup because there’s so much important news. All of the following are such big stories that I may revisit one or more of them some time in the future: (1) Please read this Victor … Continue reading →
A saying that became popularized in relation to Watergate was, “It’s not the crime, it’s the coverup.” For Watergate, that was apropos. The actual crime of breaking into Democratic National Committee headquarters palled compared to the efforts to cover it … Continue reading →
You probably remember that Carter Page was accused of all sorts of dreadful things by the FBI in concert with its handmaiden the press, in the service of getting at Trump. Page has been suing, and he’s named as defendants … Continue reading →
When I read the title of this article – “Durham vs. Horowitz: Tension Over Truth and Consequences Grips the FBI’s Trump-Russia Reckoning” – I had to jog my memory to even recall what it might be talking about. That’s how … Continue reading →
That’s the question Roger L. Simon asks here. The question is rhetorical, of course. They should, but they won’t. There’s the old “fools vs. knaves” question, too: [T]o what degree [did] these people knew they were lying at the time? … Continue reading →
The answer to that question asked here is: “no.” I suppose it’s within the realm of possibility that one or two might, although I doubt, it, but there’s virtually no chance of any substantial number of news outlets ever doing … Continue reading →
There’s a saying about justice that goes like this: “The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.” I think Durham took it to heart, because his wheels are still grinding. The whole article is worth reading.
Continue reading →I keep “circling back” (as Psaki would say) to the Durham investigation and its fallout and possible future fallout. On the one hand, I expected nothing from it. Oh, perhaps at the very beginning – it seems so long ago, … Continue reading →