Is the ABC whistleblower bona fide?

The New Neo Posted on by

By now you’ve probably heard that there’s a supposed ABC whistleblower saying the debate was rigged, and it is alleged that he signed an affidavit to that effect on September 9 and sent copies to himself registered mail, as well as to others such as Speaker Johnson.

It’s either for real or a hoax, and we don’t know which at this point. I can’t find any statements by Johnson on the matter, for example.

Here’s what ABC debate moderator Linsey Davis has said about pre-debate agreements:

ABC News’ Linsey Davis, one of two moderators for last week’s presidential debate, admitted to the Los Angeles Times that the plan was only to fact-check former President Donald Trump, and not Vice President Kamala Harris.

As Breitbart News noted, Davis and co-moderator David Muir fact-checked Trump seven times — often incorrectly — while never fact-checking Harris once, even when she used hoaxes, such as the Charlottesville “very fine people” hoax.

Davis told the Times that ABC had deliberately targeted Trump — and only Trump — because of perceptions that he had been allowed to get away with false statements in the CNN debate against President Joe Biden in late June.

I can’t get to the LA Times story and see what Linsey actually said, but although I agree that all the fact-checking (much of it false, by the way) was against Trump, and that Harris was allowed to get away with lie after lie after lie, I would be surprised if Linsey Davis flat-out admitted “we only wanted to fact-check Trump.” And sure enough, I see here:

Despite zero fact-checks for Harris, Davis insisted that her team intended to fact-check both candidates throughout the course of the night.

The Times stated, “With co-moderator David Muir, Davis had studied hours of campaign rallies and interviews to prepare for the much-anticipated event at Philadelphia’s National Constitution Center, and were ready to counter the candidates’ most egregious statements.”

Davis countered accusations of bias by stating that she and Muir could not catch every misstatement, the Times reported, without noting that none of Harris’ incorrect statements received rebukes.

Horse pucky. It would have been simplicity itself to fact-check Harris. She uttered many lies, all predictable. Davis and Muir are either so abysmally ignorant that they should never be allowed on the air again, or would like to pretend to be just that stupid and negligent. It’s ye olde fool versus knave question, and I feel confident in saying that both are operative but almost certainly the “knave” factor is most in ascendance.

ABC has issued a statement on the whistleblower’s allegations, a highly inadequate one:

However, an initial statement from ABC did not address the specific claims made within the document, saying: ‘ABC News followed the debate rules that both campaigns agreed on and which clearly state: No topics or questions will be shared in advance with campaigns or candidates.’

A spokesperson for the network was subsequently forced to issue a more full-throated denial to the Daily Beast. ‘Absolutely not. Harris was not given any questions before the date,’ the spokesperson said.

But this is a strawman argument. The accusation wasn’t that Harris was given the actual questions flat out. The affidavit actually alleged that, “the Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.” Other whistleblower allegations included that the Harris campaign was assured that only Trump would be fact-checked and not Harris, and that certain topics listed by Harris to be off-limits wouldn’t be asked about. If there really is an affidavit listing these things, and it was truly dated the day before, that absolutely needs investigating.

Ryan Routh’s Iranian connections

The New Neo Posted on by

We all know that Iran would dearly love to assassinate Trump – although Iran’s not the only one. With the recent assassination attempts comes the idea that one or both of the would-be assassins were financed or helped by Iran. For Crooks, I don’t see much evidence on which to hang such a possibility, but Routh had a very different history and online profile that makes such a theory more plausible.

I still think it most likely Routh did this all on his own, but I don’t think it’s crazy to think he was recruited by Iran. At the very least, there are some strange connections. Here’s one:

In information shared with Townhall.com, Sarah Adams, a former CIA targeter and intelligence analyst, shared a Be On The Lookout warning (BOLO) from June 2, 2023 warning of criminal activities by Ryan Routh: …

“Beware of American Ryan Routh. Reports indicate that he is leading a human trafficking scheme. He is instructing Afghans to travel illegally to Iran with the promise they will link up eventually with the Ukrainian legion to fight. This is a fraud as NO official pathway exists for this from the Ukrainian Government for our allies in Afghanistan. Also, despite promised funding support it has not come to fruition and he has abandoned Afghans illegally in Iran.”

Does that mean he actually got some Afghans into Iran? How did he do that? Did he have contacts in Iran? Where did his money come from?

And in Routh’s self-published book he wrote:

“You are free to assassinate Trump,” Routh wrote of Iran in an apparently self-published book in 2023, “Ukraine’s Unwinnable War,” which described the former President as a “fool” and “buffoon” for both the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots and the “tremendous blunder” of leaving the Iran nuclear deal.

So he was greatly in favor of Obama’s Iran nuclear deal. Interesting.

The Ukrainians wanted no part of Routh:

But Routh never served in the Ukrainian army or worked with its military, said Oleksandr Shahuri of the Foreigners Coordination Department of the Ukrainian Ground Forces Command.

Shahuri told AP that Routh periodically contacted the International Legion of Ukraine with what he described as “nonsensical ideas” that “can best be described as delusional.”

Although Iran is trying to kill Trump, would they hire a loony tune like Routh? Then again, how did he get his traveling funds?

I wrote all that before I watched this video, which contains more information and speculation:

Paging Hezbollah

The New Neo Posted on by

I didn’t even know that this could be done or how this could be done, but apparently it’s a real story. This time, the word “unprecedented” is fully warranted (unless you’re talking about a science fiction writer’s fevered dream):

At least nine people were killed and thousands were injured when pagers held by Hezbollah members across Lebanon exploded on Tuesday afternoon, in what appeared to be a widescale, coordinated attack attributed to Israel.

The unprecedented wave of explosions, which also reportedly killed and injured several people in Syria, sparked chaos in a region already on high alert for the outbreak of full-scale hostilities.

It came hours after Israel designated the halting of Hezbollah’s attacks one of its main war goals and announced that it had foiled an assassination attempt by the Iranian proxy group against a former senior official.

Lebanese Health Minister Firas Abiad said in an evening press conference that nine people were killed and 2,750 more were injured in the blasts, including some 200 people in critical condition.

Iranian proxy Hezbollah has clearly been contemplating a huge attack on Israel in addition to the rockets that rain on Israel daily and have meant that, ever since October 7, citizens who ordinarily live in the northern part of Israel have been mostly evacuated and living as internal refugees.

Hezbollah claims that some non-Hezbollah members died or were injured in this pager attack, and I don’t doubt it. However, these were pagers, not cellphones, and therefore I would imagine there isn’t a whole lot of lending out of one’s pager.

An attack of this type has tremendous shock value in the psychological sense in addition to the physical sense. The message is something like: “we see when when you’re sleeping, we know when you’re awake – and we can get you in ways you’ve never even imagined.” It also adds to the perception that the Israeli intelligence forces still have nearly-magical powers, although those powers were sorely lacking on October 7.

As I already said, I haven’t a clue how this could be done. Did the pagers originate in Israel in the first place? I doubt it. Perhaps some Israeli scientists were told, by some Hezbollah-based spy or mole, what sort of paging equipment the terrorists of Hezbollah use, and a vulnerability in the lithium batteries was exploited. This article says that Hezbollah used to employ mobile phones but switched to pagers, but doesn’t say when. Also:

“It looks likely that the pagers they [Hezbollah] purchased may have been compromised and turned into remote bombs,” [an anonymous Israeli] security expert said, stressing that this was just speculation based on his expertise.

Related theories here:

Reportedly, the Israeli intelligence send a message to the pagers which shortened the batteries of the pagers, causing them to explode.

Another, less Tom Clancy‘ish explanation would be that these fighters all belonged to the same unit and someone sabotaged them (assuming here that pagers are routinely collected, stored and distributed; which would mean that pagers were distributed this morning; perhaps it’s a mix of both).

In other words, who knows?

RIP Michaela DePrince

The New Neo Posted on by

I was shocked and saddened to read yesterday of the extremely untimely death of ballet dancer Michaela DePrince. To compound the sorrow, her mother died a day later. It’s an incredible tragedy for the family and for Michaela’s sister Mia in particular, who had become very close to Michaela when they were both little children in a Sierra Leone orphanage. Mia’s and Michaela’s lives were utterly transformed when they were adopted by the same American family and they became sisters for real.

I wrote this post ten years ago about Michaela’s story. Her life could rightly be considered inspirational; she triumphed over great odds and hardship early on. In that previous post I included this video, but I’ll include it again:

Michaela DePrince was twenty-nine years old. Her family has not revealed her cause of death; perhaps they don’t even know it yet. Her mother died of unrelated causes without learning that Michaela had died, nor did Michaela know her mother was about to die (see also this).

SCOTUS now leaks like a sieve

The New Neo Posted on by

Now we have another reminder of how far this country has degenerated. The NY Times recently published this piece about recent SCOTUS deliberations concerning the Trump cases. From this Reason article by Volokh:

First, this leak is far worse than the Dobbs leak. In Dobbs, one or more people exfiltrated a draft opinion from inside the Court, and somehow that opinion made its way to Politico. (Maybe Jodi Kantor can tell us how that happened!) It was devastating for the draft decision to become public, and it nearly led to the assassination of Justice Kavanaugh. But the aftermath of the leak was swift and overwhelming: the Court was placed on lockdown, and a sweeping investigation was launched to find the culprit(s). But the Trump leaks are systematic and thorough. We have insights of confidential memoranda, detailed conversations at conferences, KBJ’s changed vote, Justice Alito losing the Fischer majority, and information about many Roberts clerks were working on the case. This tapestry would require insights from so many different people. Moreover, all of this comes after the Dobbs leak when Chief Justice Roberts (apparently) put strict limitations on access to Court information. What did all of those measures accomplish? Apparently not much.

Second, and I alluded to this point in my earlier post, Justice Kagan is absent from this reporting. There is absolutely nothing about what she thought or did during these deliberations. There are insights into all of the other eight Justices, but nothing on Kagan. This isn’t new. Back in the day when Biskupic got the scoops, Kagan was also largely absent. I think it likely that Kagan, or at least Kagan surrogates, are behind these leaks. If Kagan is willing to publicly undermine her colleagues in a speech at the Ninth Circuit, why would she do any less off-the-record?

In recent years, the left has been chipping away at respect for the Court. They consider it an unacceptable outrage that, for the moment, it has a majority appointed by Republicans. The left sees the left as the only legitimate holder of power in all branches of government and all institutions.

The would-be Trump assassin

The New Neo Posted on by

Ryan Routh, the guy who tried to assassinate Trump yesterday, seems like a Trump-hater (no surprise there) with a few screws loose (no surprise there either). Among other things, he’s very pro-Ukraine and has tried to somehow recruit soldiers to fight for that country. He’s also got a record in North Carolina:

Routh is a native of North Carolina, where his list of arrests includes simple drug possession, driving without a license, expired inspection and operating a vehicle with no insurance. In addition, the Greensboro News & Record reported in 2002 that Routh was arrested after barricading himself in his roofing company’s office during a three-hour standoff that followed a traffic stop in which he put his hand on a gun before fleeing.

Routh apparently voted for Trump in 2016 but later came to hate him and support Democrats.

One very interesting and revealing comment is by his son [my emphasis]:

The son of the alleged gunman who targeted former President Donald Trump on his Florida golf course Sunday said his dad hates Trump like “every reasonable person does” — but claimed he’s not a violent person, according to a report.

Oran Routh told the Daily Mail that his father, Ryan Routh, who was arrested in the alleged assassination attempt, isn’t a fan of the Republican nominee.

“I don’t like Trump either,” he added.

I’m glad we’ve got that cleared up – neither of them is one of those Trump-loving crazies. This particular form of virtue-signaling by Routh’s son is an excellent sign of how such hatred has been utterly mainstreamed by the relentless hammering home by Democrats and the MSM that Trump is literally Hitler and deserves to die.

Speaking of Democrats:

And who’s responsible for all the violence against Trump, according to the MSM? Why, Trump, of course.

From the Bee:

This old house

The New Neo Posted on by

I think this video is kind of fun. My observations follow:

(1) My mother called the refrigerator the icebox for most or maybe even all of her life.
(2) I have very strong memories of transom windows. In particular, they were a feature of my pediatrician’s office waiting room. I found them ominous after that, and still do. I hated that office with its odd medicinal smell.
(3) When I was in law school I lived with four other women in a house with a parlor and a living room. It had only one bathroom, however, which was quite a challenge with five or us.
(4) In my married life I lived in a house that had been built in the 1930s and had what you might call servants’ quarters, although we certainly didn’t have servants. There was a large garage, and over that were two very small rooms and a bathroom, accessed by a special staircase that led from the kitchen.
(5) I don’t have any personal experience of wash basins.
(6) That same house that had the servants’ quarters above the garage had a coal chute in the basement.
(7) I never had knob and tube wiring.
(8) When I was a child we didn’t have a milk door, but we had a milkbox right outside the kitchen door, on the side stoop. It was made out of wood and lined with metal.
(9) Yep, that same house with the servants’ quarters had a butler’s pantry, albeit a rather small one.
(10) Never had a dumbwaiter.
(11) Never had picture rails.

Kamala Harris gives a 10-minute interview

The New Neo Posted on by

As Archie Bunker would say, whoop-de-doo.

I didn’t watch all of it; just a couple of minutes. But here’s an analysis from Elizabeth Stauffer at Legal Insurrection:

If Harris’s reply sounds familiar to you, it’s because we heard parts of it – almost verbatim – three days earlier, as she tried to dodge a similar question during the debate with former President Donald Trump. In contrast to her surprisingly strong and coherent performance on Tuesday night, her responses throughout this interview were laced with the “word salads” we’ve grown so accustomed to hearing from Harris.

Describing her answer in a post on X, The National Review’s Noah Rothman wrote, “It takes some species of talent to filibuster for 90 straight seconds while saying nothing [at] all of value.”

Here’s the interview:

Harris’ answers during the debate with Trump sounded canned, but that’s not so unusual because candidates always prepare for a set of topics they expect to encounter. But it is odd that she sounded more disjointed and rambling in this recent short sit-down interview from a friendly source pitching softballs. And if you think – as some people assert (“without evidence”) – that she got the questions for Tuesday evening in advance, why would you think she wouldn’t have gotten these questions in advance as well?

Personally, I think she just has a number of statements in her head that she’s practiced and used over and over, and sometimes she’s more coherent in stating them and sometimes less so. They are usually some combination of platitudes, lies, and meaningless stories. Nothing this woman says sounds sincere or authentic to me.