↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 208 << 1 2 … 206 207 208 209 210 … 1,864 1,865 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Foreign aid for Ukraine and Israel passes the House

The New Neo Posted on April 20, 2024 by neoApril 20, 2024

Republicans are more split on aid to Ukraine, while Democrats are more split on aid to Israel. That means, however, that aid to both countries is supported by the majority of Congress through the mechanism of bipartisanship. That’s the way Congress used to function, to the best of my recollection:

The House Rules Committee voted 9-3 to advance the package, with Democratic support being a rare occurrence for Republican bills.

Republican Reps. Chip Roy, Thomas Massie, and Ralph Norman voted against the rule, expressing frustration that aid to Ukraine was not paired with conservative border security provisions.

But that pairing would have meant that it didn’t pass, because it would have lost Democrat support, and it needed Democrat support to pass at all.

Various parts of the package are expected to pass with bipartisan coalitions this weekend.

And that’s what happened:

Speaker Mike Johnson risked his political career to shepherd through over $60 billion in Ukrainian aid on the House floor on Saturday as part of a $95 billion aid package for U.S. allies.

The package in total gives $26 billion to Israel, $60.8 billion to Ukraine and $8 billion to the Indo-Pacific through a combination of military and humanitarian aid.

The package consisting of three separate aid bills was voted on alongside a fourth ‘side car’ that includes a potential TikTok ban and a vehicle to repurpose seized Russian assets for Ukraine.

The bill providing cash for Kyiv – by far the most contentious of the day and the one Johnson could lost his job over – passed 311 to 112.

‘We would rather send bullets to the conflict overseas than our own boys, our troops,’ Johnson insisted after the vote.

The Israel aid bill passed 366 to 58, with opposition largely consisting of progressives who wanted the aid conditioned on a ceasefire.

Many Republicans wanted it paired with border security; I would have strongly preferred that myself. However, you can’t always get what you want:

House Speaker Mike Johnson had previously pushed to pair aid to Ukraine with border security provisions. However, his efforts were met with resistance, leading to several rules failing on the floor, largely due to objections from the right flank of the party. Despite calls from several members of the Republican conference to raise the threshold to bring a motion to oust the speaker, Johnson announced that the House “will continue to govern under the existing rules.”

Those who are against aid to either country (Republicans who oppose Ukraine aid; Democrats who oppose Israel aid) are angry. People want what they want. The reality is the razor-thin Republican House majority and the razor-thin Democrat Senate majority, and the division within Republican and Democrat ranks. The Republicans who oppose what happened can get rid of their Speakers over and over, but that won’t get them what they want either, because the reality of the situation blocks it.

And then there are the people who would be happy with aiding neither Ukraine nor Israel. That’s a much smaller group – nearly entirely in the GOP, as far as I can tell – and it’s not going to get what it wants either, because a bipartisan majority wants something quite different.

NOtE: The Byzantine machinations of Congress are hard to follow, and very few people do so. I can’t say I’ve followed every single back and forth, either.

Posted in Finance and economics, Israel/Palestine, War and Peace | 53 Replies

China’s baby problem

The New Neo Posted on April 20, 2024 by neoApril 20, 2024

I’ve watched many videos on the reluctance of the young people of China to have children. The problem affects other countries in Asia and the West as a whole as well, but in Europe and the US it’s nothing like as bad as in China – although who knows, we may be headed China’s way.

I’m not sure everything in these China videos is correct in terms of causes or details, but they paint a very grim and similar picture, and they all agree on a couple of things: that the younger generations in China work extremely hard at mostly unrewarding jobs and are exhausted, that they reject family life because they see it as a money and time drain, and that they are narcissistic and very materialistic.

These videos indicate to me that a significant part of the problem is that the Chicoms purposely weakened the family without replacing it with anything else except consumerism, an empty substitute. It sounds as though depression is very widespread there, whether clinically diagnosed or not. Their forced one-child policy meant that many in the younger generations have been only children, with all the indulgence, pressure, and loneliness that sometimes entails. Bigger families would be somewhat foreign to them, and I bet that many have never even been around babies all that much, or learned what the rewards of parenthood or siblinghood can be.

I think refusal to have children may also be a way to rebel in a society that doesn’t offer all that many avenues for rebellion.

Take a look:

I hadn’t seen the following video when I first wrote this post, but it has a great deal of information on how the one-child policy may have influenced the current worrisome phenomenon. That portion begins at minute 10:18, but I think the entire thing is interesting:

Posted in Finance and economics, Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex | Tagged China | 23 Replies

“Equity grading”: forced regression towards the mean

The New Neo Posted on April 20, 2024 by neoApril 20, 2024

[Hat tip: Ace.]

We can’t have students feeling bad about their grades – unless they’re smart and high-achieving students. Then it’s okay.

So let’s eliminate the tails, says California. All students will be equally – or almost equally – mediocre:

No D’s and F’s? No extra credit? Will Bay Area schools’ switch to equity grading help or harm students? Dublin Unified School District says the public school grading system is unfair
Hrihaan Bhutani is already thinking about college. The Dublin High freshman is taking four Advanced Placement classes next year and has crammed his schedule with extracurricular activities to better his chances of getting into an Ivy League school.

But a change at the high school designed to get students less focused on grades has done the opposite. Suddenly, in some classes, A’s are almost unachievable, unless you score 100%. And F’s don’t exist. For high-achieving students like Bhutani, the pressure to be perfect is even more of a burden.

“I feel more stressed … now with this new system,” said Bhutani, who is especially sweating his biology class, one of dozens trying a variety of new grading scales under a two-year experiment. “Even if you’re at a 99, you would get moved down to an 85,” he explained, which translates to a world-ending B.

Dublin Unified’s new grading policy will go into effect for all 6th through 12th grade classes next year and is part of a national shift toward “equity grading” — a controversial concept that moves away from traditional grading to better measure how well students understand what they are being taught.

Traditional grades measure how well students understand what they are being taught, if tests are decently designed and assignments for writing papers are relevant.

More:

Next year, the district will restrict all letter grades to a 10% range and remove the practice of awarding zero points for assignments as long as they were “reasonably attempted.” The new policy will also remove extra credit and bonus points that elevated grades, and provide students with multiple chances to make up missed or failed assignments and minimize homework’s impact on a student’s grade.

If an assignment is “reasonably attempted” it wouldn’t be getting a zero anyway. Zero is for not turning it in at all. And the new policy eliminates many opportunities for good students to do exceptionally well at the same time it gives more opportunities for poor students to do better or to seem to do better (“minimizing homework’s impact” – why?).

Here’s the bottom line:

“This will up kids graduating, it will up their numbers,” said Laurie Sargent, an eighth grade English teacher at Cottonwood Creek, a TK-8th grade school in Dublin. “They’ll have fewer kids failing and then that looks good. It’s strategic.”

It’s all about the numbers, and if you eliminate failing than your numbers automatically improve.

I have come to loathe the word “equity,” which has been used in an Orwellian manner for way too long.

Posted in Education | Tagged California | 20 Replies

I want to highlight this video on Israel’s Iran attack

The New Neo Posted on April 20, 2024 by neoApril 20, 2024

In case you missed it when I posted it in an addendum yesterday – here’s a fascinating take on what Israel’s attack on Iran was all about:

Posted in Iran, Israel/Palestine, War and Peace | 4 Replies

Open thread 4/20/24

The New Neo Posted on April 20, 2024 by neoApril 20, 2024

“If Jimmy jumped off a cliff, would you follow him?”

Posted in Uncategorized | 44 Replies

Iran, Israel, and MAD

The New Neo Posted on April 19, 2024 by neoApril 19, 2024

So, what’s going on between Iran and Israel after Israel launched a limited strike against Iran?:

The primary target seems to have been air defense systems around the Khatami Air Base near Isfahan. This is one of the bases from which last weekend’s attack on Israel was launched. …

Concurrent with the attack in Iran, Israel hit air defense sites in Syria. There are no conclusive reports of damage caused by any of the strikes. The scope of the attack indicates that Iranian nuclear facilities were not the target.

Neither side is making a big deal of the attack.

Is this just some sort of theater? Or is it a prelude to something bigger? I’m not sure that either side is all that sure at the moment. They’re jockeying for position and sizing each other up.

I’ve long thought that Iran won’t do all that much to Israel – except through terrorist proxies as well as worldwide propaganda – until it has nuclear weapons. Even then, it might hesitate – accent on the might – if it thought Israel would destroy it in return.

I read this interesting article at Ace’s recently. It looks at the big picture:

… [T]he Iranian attack [on Israel] was a three-pronged event using slower drones, faster cruise missiles, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles. This was different, not just in who was attacking, but the methodology. The success of the defense has got a lot of people thinking and planning and, frankly, worried.

Worried? Why worried? Wouldn’t a successful defense be a good thing? Well:

The creation of the Anti-Ballistic Missile systems (ABMs) [in the Cold War] resulted in a series of negotiations, because this was destabilized the MAD doctrine. A viable ABM system allows one side to defeat a first strike, then free it to launch a strike of their own– and win. So both sides agreed to stop building and limited themselves to one system. The US put its ABM system around some of the missile fields; the Russians put theirs around Moscow.

Now let’s consider a Regional Conflict. Over time nuclear weapons have proliferated. Pakistan, India, China, France, and Great Britian have nukes, and likely others such as South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, South Africa (maybe), and presumably, Israel. In the bipolar years, nobody gave much thought to Regional Conflicts. Why? Regional powers didn’t have nukes, so why bother. But not anymore. This begs the question then — and the reason a lot of thinkers are busy late into the night — can a Regional Nuclear War be fought, and won?

That would act as an incentive rather than a deterrent – if a country such as Iran thought that was possible.

More:

Can MAD exist in a regional context? I think it can, but the likelihood of weapon use in oneies and twoies goes up dramatically. More so given there are other delivery options: trains, cars, airlines, etc. Better question is can MAD exist in the Middle East? Just how crazy are the muzzies? This would keep me awake at night.

In the short run, a wider war with Iran doesn’t appear to be happening right now. But the situation is highly unstable, and you don’t need me to tell you that. It’s obvious.

And nukes could and almost certainly would change the whole picture.

ADDENDUM:

Hat tip: commenter “sdferr.”

Fascinating take on it:

Posted in Iran, Israel/Palestine, War and Peace | 28 Replies

Trump at the Harlem bodega

The New Neo Posted on April 19, 2024 by neoApril 19, 2024

In adversity there can be opportunity. Force Trump to remain in New York City in order to attend his show trial, and he manages to make a clever – and symbolic – campaign stop:

Tuesday, after court, Trump went to Harlem. Talk about grabbing political advantage.

Trump went to the bodega, where, two years ago, a clerk, Jose Alba, stabbed and killed an ex-convict who was attacking him.

Alba was charged with murder. It took three weeks for the radical D.A. Alvin Bragg to drop the charge.

Note the the guy who persecuted Alba was the same person currently persecuting Trump in the NY trial: Alvin Bragg.

More:

Alba had to leave the country. New Yorkers were outraged at the crime and injustice.

That’s the backdrop to Trump’s bodega visit.

[Trump] was greeted by a large and diverse crowd that loved him.

I’m in awe of his energy.

ADDENDUM:

By the way, in case you’re wondering whether the MSM is covering this, the answer is “yes.”

From CNN:

And what CBS has to say.

From the AP:

And what Politico has to say.

Trump knows how to get attention.

Posted in Election 2024, Law, Trump | 18 Replies

The UN once again proves how morally bankrupt it is by saying hey, let’s reward violent terrorists with a state!

The New Neo Posted on April 19, 2024 by neoApril 19, 2024

And the AP does its thing. I’m referring to the article’s headline: “US vetoes widely supported resolution backing full UN membership for Palestine.” You see, it’s “widely supported” – by the many tyrannies, corrupt banana republics (except ours), failed nations, and enabling and cowardly first-world countries.

The lede:

The United States vetoed a widely backed U.N. resolution Thursday that would have paved the way for full United Nations membership for Palestine, a goal the Palestinians have long sought and Israel has worked to prevent.

Nasty US, nasty Israel, harming the poor suffering Palestinians who so very much deserve UN membership. Actually, the Palestinians are already the greatest beneficiaries of the UN, having been financially supported by UNRWA – and educated in Jew-hatred by UNWRA – for pretty much the duration of Israel’s existence.

More:

The vote in the 15-member Security Council was 12 in favor, the United States opposed and two abstentions, from the United Kingdom and Switzerland. U.S. allies France, Japan and South Korea supported the resolution.

The UK and Switzerland have shown modified and tepid good sense by at least not voting for the measure.

Here’s the official position of the Biden administration:

Since the attacks of October 7, President Biden has been clear that sustainable peace in the region can only be achieved through a two-state solution, with Israel’s security guaranteed. There is no other path that guarantees Israel’s security and future as a democratic Jewish state.

There is no other path that guarantees Palestinians can live in peace and with dignity in a state of their own. And there is no other path that leads to regional integration between Israel and all its Arab neighbors, including Saudi Arabia.

We also have long been clear that premature actions here in New York, even with the best intentions, will not achieve statehood for the Palestinian people.

“With Israel’s security guaranteed” is the important part. Until that happens, Palestinians will not be living “in peace and with dignity in a state of their own.” And I see no path to that except obliteration of Hamas, and occupation by some entity or entities that will be reshaping the minds of the people there and in particular the coming generations. Tall order, to say the least – taller, I believe, than in postwar Germany and Japan, although at least the number of people involved is much smaller.

At the moment I can’t find the link where I read it, but apparently the US announced in advance of the vote that it intended to use its veto. This had the effect of giving cover to the other nations to vote for admittance or to abstain, saying to the terrorist crocodile: “Please, Mr. Crocodile, please eat me last!” It also allowed the European nations in the Security Council to placate their sizable Muslim populations, knowing that because of the US’s veto there would be no real consequences.

I’m actually surprised that the Biden administration had the cojones to veto the resolution.

The UN has long been in the business of rewarding the worst terrorist attacks of the Palestinians, beginning with the Munich massacre that got so much notoriety and Arafat’s subsequent 1974 appearance there. He addressed the General Assembly, saying, among other things:

Our resolve to build a new world is fortified — a world free of colonialism, imperialism, neo-colonialism and racism in each of its instances, including zionism.

That’s what the Soviets taught him to say, and he learned his lesson well.

More:

Our world aspires to peace, justice, equality and freedom. It wishes that oppressed nations, bent under the weight of imperialism, might gain their freedom and their right to self-determination.

Sure thing; that’s what the Palestinians want. Every leftist buzzword is there – as far back as fifty years ago.

Actually, Arafat was laughing at them all:

In an article last week about dramatic moments at the United Nations (“Laughter at Trump among a long line of shocking U.N. moments“), the Associated Press covers up the most dramatic element of Yasser Arafat’s 1974 United Nations address: that he brought a gun to the international body and even delivered the address while openly sporting the holster.

In his Sept. 26 article, Tamer Fakahany obscures that Yasser Arafat actually brought his gun to the United Nations and wore the holster during his address, instead presenting the unprecedented nature of his appearance there as relating only to the statement: “Today, I have come bearing an olive branch and a freedom fighter’s gun.Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat: Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand.” …

(According to an earlier AP report, he was forced to deposit the gun before mounting the rostrum.)

AP’s Sept. 28 2012 account of the same speech explicitly stated in the heading “Yasser Arafat brings his gun to the U.N.” It also contained the key information omitted from last week’s report: “Arafat appeared wearing his gun belt and holster, reluctantly removing his pistol before mounting the rostrum.”

It was a threat from Arafat. He knew how to do political theater, and it has served the Palestinians in their bid to gain sympathy and support from the West while they nurture and act out their destructive and violent hated of Israel, the Jews, and the West.

Posted in Israel/Palestine | 19 Replies

Open thread 4/19/24

The New Neo Posted on April 19, 2024 by neoApril 19, 2024

Posted in Uncategorized | 48 Replies

The president of Columbia has her turn before Congress

The New Neo Posted on April 18, 2024 by neoApril 18, 2024

Minouche Shafik is president of Columbia University, and like the troika of other Ivy college presidents before her who testified before the House about campus anti-Semitism, she recently was interviewed by that legislative body. Shafik had the advantage of having seen her predecessors’ errors, and the reaction to what they said.

However:

Representative Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.) asked Shafik during the hearing whether she had seen anti-Jewish protests on Columbia’s campus, to which the university president responded that she had not.

My, my.

Some excerpts from the testimony:

By the way, Shafik is a Muslim who was born in Egypt and came to this country as a young child and went back to Egypt for a while as a teenager. That said, I actually don’t think this has much if anything to do with her stance here. Most of the university heads we’ve heard from – whatever their origins and whatever their religion or lack thereof – have the same lawyerly, evasive, double standards about Jews/Israel versus other groups and countries. If the topic were, for example, anti-black speech and behavior, their answers would be very different and far less equivocal. Shafik is quite typical and not an outlier – in fact she’s probably at least somewhat better (which isn’t saying much), perhaps because she had the advantage of seeing the testimony of the others and had a lot more time to prepare.

Posted in Academia, Israel/Palestine, Jews | Tagged anti-Semitism | 18 Replies

The death of Leon Klinghoffer

The New Neo Posted on April 18, 2024 by neoApril 18, 2024

I happened across an old post of mine (2006) about the Palestinian terrorist hijacking of a cruise ship in 1985, during which they murdered a disabled elderly American Jewish man in a wheelchair, named Leon Klinghoffer. The post was also about an opera made on the subject during the 1990s.

I decided to repost the gist of it because I am often struck by the fact that our current Israel/Palestine conflicts and reactions are intensifications of a situation that has been going on in similar fashion for a long time: the cruelty and brazenness of the terrorists, the fact that the legal system in various countries is inadequate and/or unwilling to punish them properly, and the widespread leftist sympathy for their cause and their heinous actions.

So here it is:

Last night [in 2006] was the opening of the controversial opera “The Death of Klinghoffer” at New York’s Lincoln Center. It was marked by protests:

Demonstrators, primarily associated with Jewish groups, plan to rally outside Lincoln Center with 100 wheelchairs, in honor of the slain handicapped Leon Klinghoffer, on whom “The Death of Klinghoffer” is based.

Klinghoffer was hurled from the Achille Lauro cruise ship by PLO terrorists in 1985 after it was hijacked. The opera, which centers on the terrorists who perpetrated the murder, has been accused of glorifying terrorism and incorporating anti-Semitic tropes.

The opera is not new; it was first produced in 1991, and has drawn protests wherever it goes. It’s not hard to see why.

As Thomas Sowell once asked, referring to Klinghoffer’s murderers:

What kind of people would throw an old man in a wheelchair off a cruise liner into the sea, simply because he was Jewish?

The answer, of course, is “terrorists,” and we’ve spent a lot of time and energy in recent years explaining them and fighting them. That they are also human beings doesn’t mean we need to sympathize with them.

I recall hearing the news of the hijacking and the shocking manner of Klinghoffer’s death at the time it occurred, but back then I was unaware of the almost immediate post-modern interest of some in understanding—empathizing with, and even sympathizing with—Klinghoffer’s murderers, or with their “narrative.” In the years since, and especially post-9/11, such enabling attitudes have become only too apparent.

“The Death of Klinghoffer” is an example of the genre. In the olden days, an opera on such a theme might have featured the terrorists as traditional villains steeped in evil, with thunderous and dissonant music to signify the horror of what they did. But in this version they are given sonorous and lovely melodies to sing and sympathetic words to utter. But it wasn’t enough to portray the murderers in a sensitive light; the Klinghoffers and their associates are portrayed less nobly:

More than 20 years ago, in his review of the Brooklyn Academy of Music’s premiere of the opera, The New York Times chief music critic, Edward Rothstein, questioned the presentation of Jews and Palestinian Arabs as “symmetrical victims of each other’s hatreds.” Rothstein later wrote that the opera’s depiction of its Jewish characters reduced them “to petty triviality” compared to their Palestinian counterparts.

The opera’s librettist, Alice Goodman, is an interesting tale herself. Born and raised as a Jew in Minnesota, educated in literature at Harvard, married to a British poet, she became an Anglican priest and opera librettist.

You can listen to Ms. Goodman discussing the opera here, in a BBC interview that features a selection from it sung by one of the terrorists. Without even being able to decipher the words of the libretto, just hearing the music and the voice of the kidnapper makes it clear that he is being given a respect and a certain esthetic elegance and dignity that could only serve to elevate him in the eyes of the listener.

Ms. Goodman’s answer to the question of whether the opera is anti-Semitic or an apology for terrorism is an interesting one. She says no (no surprise there); she believes that the charges of anti-Semitism and the rest are a result of her showing the terrorists as “human beings.”

Well, terrorists are most decidedly human beings, as were Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin, and—well, every other human being who’s ever lived. We all know how Hitler loved dogs, and was a vegetarian. To be evil does not require that one be a devil; being a human being who does evil will suffice. But considering terrorists human beings does not require giving them a forum by writing lovely arias for them to sing.

Ms. Goodman says she speaks not just as the librettist, but as a priest, when she recognizes the perpetrators as human beings with ideals—wrongheaded, yes, but idealistic nevertheless—as though idealism somehow has a value in and of itself. She acknowledges that the music and the words she and her collaborator wrote for the terrorists who killed Klinghoffer were lyrical and heartfelt, and she understands that this fact created “a dissonance difficult for some people to take.”

Indeed. I guess we’re not all highly evolved enough to understand the convoluted mental gymnastics required in comprehending how that doesn’t constitute some sort of sympathy and apology—if not for the devil, then for the human beings who perpetrated this heinous act.

NOTE: More background on Klinghoffer’s death here:

Holding the passengers and crew hostage, [the Achille Lauro hijackers] ordered the captain to sail to Tartus, Syria, and demanded the release of 50 Palestinians then in Israeli prisons, including the Lebanese prisoner Samir Kuntar.

The next day, after being refused permission by the Syrian government to dock at Tartus, the hijackers singled out Klinghoffer, a Jew, for murder [after separating out the American and Jewish passengers into a special group], shooting him in the forehead and chest as he sat in his wheelchair. They then forced the ship’s barber and a waiter to throw his body and wheelchair overboard. Marilyn Klinghoffer, who did not witness the shooting, was told by the hijackers that he had been moved to the infirmary. She only learned the truth after the hijackers left the ship at Port Said. PLO Foreign Secretary Farouq Qaddumi said that perhaps the terminally ill Marilyn Klinghoffer had killed her husband for insurance money. However, the PLO later accepted full responsibility for murdering Mr. Klinghoffer.

Initially, the hijackers were granted safe passage to Tunisia, but U.S. President Ronald Reagan ordered a U.S. fighter plane to force the get-away plane to land at Naval Air Station Sigonella in Italy. After an extradition dispute, Italian authorities arrested and later tried the Palestinian terrorists, but let Abu Abbas fly to Yugoslavia.

I highlighted the above for two reasons. The first is the statement of Farouq Qaddumi. The second is the action of President Reagan.

I wonder if Qaddumi is given an aria in the opera, too.

By the way, this is what happened to Abu Abbas. I hadn’t known these facts when I wrote the original post; I just discovered them:

Muhammad Zaidan (10 December 1948 – 8 March 2004), also known as Abu Abbas or Muhammad Abbas, was (with Tal’at Ya’qoub) a founder of the Palestine Liberation Front (PLF) Organization. …

On 14 April 2003, Zaidan was captured by American Special Forces in Iraq while attempting to flee from Baghdad to Syria. Italy subsequently requested his extradition. The Pentagon reported on 9 March 2004 that Zaidan had died the previous day, of natural causes, while in U.S. custody. The PLF accused the Americans of assassinating their leader. The U.S. authorities agreed to give Abbas’ body to the Palestine Red Crescent Society for burial in Ramallah on the West Bank. However, his burial there was blocked by the Israeli authorities, and he was buried in the Martyrs’ Cemetery in Damascus instead.

The wheels of justice grind slow, but sometimes they don’t appear to grind at all.

Posted in Israel/Palestine, Jews, Middle East, Music, Terrorism and terrorists, Violence | 19 Replies

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on April 18, 2024 by neoApril 18, 2024

(1) Biden gives the Israelis a stern talking-to:

(2) And then there are the tall tales:

His uncle was indeed in a plane that had to ditch over the ocean, in that area of the world, because of engine failure. He was not flying the plane at the time, but I’m going to assume he was indeed a pilot. However, most criticisms of what Biden said seem to ignore a few other things, such as the fact that he said his uncles enlisted right after D-Day. I’m going to assume he meant the attack on Pearl Harbor, because the date of his uncle’s death was May 14, 1944, three weeks before D-Day.

(3) [Hat tip commenter “Barry Meislin”] Gazans sunbathe:

Footage of thousands of Gazans enjoying the beach at Deir al-Balah in the Gaza Strip caused great anger in Israel.

“While Israeli citizens are preparing bomb shelters and buying generators, and at least 100,000 civilians are evacuated from their homes in the north and south of the country, and most importantly 133 hostages are still in Gaza, residents of Deir al-Balah demonstrate what ‘a step from absolute victory’ looks like,” one social media user commented.

Journalist Barak Ravid wrote: “It must be said that there is no longer a war in Gaza. Maybe there is partial and limited fighting. Maybe Israeli TV channels will also report on this eventually.”

I’ll cut Netanyahu a little slack. There is indeed a pause. If the pause continues too much longer, it’s a very bad idea. But I do think it’s just a pause while they prepare their next step.

(4) What could possibly, possibly, go wrong? In California:

Steven Bradford, a Democratic state Senator for LA County, proposed bill SB 1403 to create a controversial genealogy unit to ‘confirm reparations eligibility’ of applicants.

The state’s first-in-the-nation reparations task force last year decided that some residents should win $1.2 million payouts as compensation for injustices from the slavery era onwards.

But lawmakers have struggled to turn those plans into reality, and have advanced several bills to devise a working reparations scheme amid fears of spiralling costs in a cash-strapped state.

Bradford’s bill, which was amended this month, aims to solve the problem of working out who is in line for a payout.

The Nazis can only envy us the tools we have at our disposal. By the way, most of the American black population (not recent arrivals from Africa) have some white ancestors, and although their percentage of white DNA varies it’s often at least 20% to 50%. And quite a few white people have a percentage – a smaller percentage, but nevertheless a percentage – of black DNA. Nor, of course, does DNA tell the story of whose black ancestors were slaves and whose were not, unless one does an entire family tree going back to the slavery era.

Reparations is a terrible terrible idea on every single level.

(5) How’s that Trump jury selection process going?:

The jury selection process is ongoing, but what began at a fairly brisk pace has slowed somewhat, with two of the previously empaneled jurors being dismissed Thursday morning.

As things sat at the end of the day on Tuesday, seven of the 12 jurors needed had been seated. (Up to six alternates will also be chosen.)

But two of the seated jurors have since been dismissed: one for lying about his arrest history, and one because friends and family had reminded her of some of her previous history (I assume her social media history) that indicated she could not be impartial. Translated, I think this means that she had tweeted or posted on Facebook comments that were either critical of Trump or in favor of him. I don’t know which.

In the first round of jury selection, “over half of the nearly 100 prospective jurors were swiftly excused as they expressed their inability to be fair or impartial.” Another man was dismissed by the judge when Trump’s attorneys dug up this 2017 tweet of his:

Good news!! Trump lost his court battle on his unlawful travel ban!!! Get him out and lock him up.

Had this man already said he thought he could be an impartial juror, prior to the judge’s dismissing him? I don’t know. But it wouldn’t surprise me.

Posted in Uncategorized | 31 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Rick Gutleber on Open thread 3/16/2026
  • Donzie on One movie after another
  • Sennacherib on Trump’s message on Kharg Island and the Strait of Hormuz
  • CICERO on One movie after another
  • om on Open thread 3/16/2026

Recent Posts

  • Open thread 3/16/2026
  • One movie after another
  • Mamdani and the leftist mayors
  • Trump’s message on Kharg Island and the Strait of Hormuz
  • Open thread 3/14/2026

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (318)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (161)
  • Best of neo-neocon (88)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (580)
  • Dance (286)
  • Disaster (238)
  • Education (319)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (510)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (12)
  • Election 2028 (4)
  • Evil (126)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,000)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (724)
  • Health (1,132)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (329)
  • History (699)
  • Immigration (426)
  • Iran (402)
  • Iraq (223)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (785)
  • Jews (414)
  • Language and grammar (357)
  • Latin America (202)
  • Law (2,881)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,270)
  • Liberty (1,097)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (386)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,464)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (902)
  • Middle East (380)
  • Military (308)
  • Movies (343)
  • Music (523)
  • Nature (254)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (176)
  • Obama (1,735)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (126)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,015)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,765)
  • Pop culture (392)
  • Press (1,609)
  • Race and racism (857)
  • Religion (411)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (621)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (263)
  • Therapy (67)
  • Trump (1,575)
  • Uncategorized (4,332)
  • Vietnam (108)
  • Violence (1,394)
  • War and Peace (961)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑