That’s persuasive, right? Feldman is emblematic of the decline of legal reasoning and of reasoning as a whole in academic life. Law schools have long been the bastion of the “critical” approach to scholarship and argument, beginning in the late … Continue reading →
The big news of the last two days is Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony before the January 6th committee on all the awful things Trump did, or what others said he did, or what she says others said he did. Andrew C. … Continue reading →
From Scott Johnson at Powerline: The FBI appears to have taken up the role of the ruling party’s enforcement arm. I submit that that happened a long time ago. The post contains many links to help you get up to … Continue reading →
Let’s talk about January 6th, say Democrats and a few NeverTrumpers. Let’s talk about it again and again and again. Perhaps the House will decide to impeach Trump for the third time; they seem rather addicted to it. And now … Continue reading →
Well worth reading.
Continue reading →This is from two days ago [emphasis mine]: It looks like the FBI top brass kept Hillary Clinton’s campaign identity a secret when it pushed her disinformation to Chicago-based FBI agents investigating ties between Trump and Russia’s Alfa-Bank. That’s according … Continue reading →
Musk says that if and when he owns Twitter he will allow Trump to return: Musk said Tuesday he would reverse Twitter’s ban on former President Donald Trump if his acquisition goes through. “Permanent bans should be extremely rare and … Continue reading →
After writing about Midge Decter’s death yesterday, I looked up her husband Norman Podhoretz. I was pretty sure he was still alive, and sure enough, he is – at 92. Decter was 94. So there’s a lot of longevity in … Continue reading →
Could be: …[T]he most investigated man in America is set to walk away from another grand jury with no charges brought against him. “A six-month grand jury convened to hear evidence in the investigation into the business dealings of former … Continue reading →
…in the Pennsylvania senatorial GOP primary, here’s a good explanation. Sounds reasonable to me.
Continue reading →Trump made some prescient – although obvious – points back in 2018. He was speaking to the secretary of NATO: TRUMP: We’re protecting Germany, we’re protecting France, we’re protecting everybody and yet we’re paying a lot of money to protect… … Continue reading →
It’s hard to conclude otherwise. It seems to me quite obvious that if Ukraine had kept its nuclear weapons, Russia would not have attacked it. Or at the very least, Russia would have been far more reluctant to have attacked … Continue reading →