“Oldflyer” writes: I am also pleased to reflect that I took the measure of Chris Wallace some time back. To be honest, I find it hard of late to listen to any of the pontificators–most of whom I call Yappers. … Continue reading →
I don’t know the exact point at which naivete segues into stupidity, but Peggy Noonan crossed it long ago. So why would I pay any attention to her? Well, she still has a WSJ column, for some reason. Plus, her … Continue reading →
Everybody’s writing about Chris Cuomo’s firing, so this is my post about it. But it doesn’t interest my much, so this will be cursory. Why doesn’t it interest me much? Basically because (a) I’ve never watched him; and (b) I … Continue reading →
…and the phenomenon has been present from the start. In my opinion, it’s done intentionally, and it continues with each new variant that has taken hold to any marked degree. I’m not a scientist, but very early on in the … Continue reading →
“Reporting the controversy.”
Continue reading →As soon as it was revealed that the Waukesha mass murderer was a black career criminal who hated white people, it was a no-brainer to state that the huge story would fade from view as quickly as possible and that … Continue reading →
A lot of people thought Kyle Rittenhouse shouldn’t give an interview at all at this point, and especially not to Tucker Carlson. After all, Carlson has gotten a lot of flak for his supposed extremism and in particular for his … Continue reading →
Mary Chastain at Legal Insurrection wades through the cesspool of the left’s reaction to the Rittenhouse verdict so you don’t have to. Their reaction is what you might have suspected. They also have a personal dog in this race, since … Continue reading →
That’s the question Roger L. Simon asks here. The question is rhetorical, of course. They should, but they won’t. There’s the old “fools vs. knaves” question, too: [T]o what degree [did] these people knew they were lying at the time? … Continue reading →
And as so often is the case with news of special interest to the US right, it’s a British paper that publishes it. Sandmann has learned more in a few years through the crucible of his personal experience than most … Continue reading →
Not hyperbole; hyperbola. I used to follow Sullivan quite closely, even before I became a blogger. However, he really went off the deep end some time during the candidacy of Sarah Palin and developed a very singular theory about her … Continue reading →
Here’s an interesting Twitter thread (hat tip: commenter “Barry Meislin”): I am highly educated and reasonably perceptive, and it was only today that I learned the Kyle Rittenhouse victims were white. My progressive bubble made this seem like a very … Continue reading →