Some coverage here as well as here. Pelosi quote of the day; “He gave us no choice.” That’s funny on a lot of levels. First there’s the obvious one, which is Pelosi’s fake pose (probably perceived even by impeachment supporters … Continue reading →
Or the woodwork. Or the shadows. Or wherever they usually hide and do their secretive business. Ever since the FISA application abuse by the FBI surfaced – and I’m talking about long before the Horowitz report, back during the days … Continue reading →
[NOTE: I’ll probably post Part 2 tomorrow.] The interview Comey gave to Chris Wallace on Sunday was a study in evasion and deception. I could take it sentence by sentence and spend many hours analyzing each one, but I’m not … Continue reading →
One of the drawbacks of serving for a long time in public life is that we have the ability to compare a politician’s previous statements to his/her present ones. Sometimes it goes like this, if your name is Chuck Schumer, … Continue reading →
An interesting piece by Melanie Phillips: The stakes in this election were enormous, not just for Britain but for the world. Labour is led by the most far-left leadership in its history, supporting terrorists abroad and incubating virulent antisemitism at … Continue reading →
…the House Judiciary Committee votes along party lines to approve the two impeachment articles: “There was an abuse of power at the Department of Justice, there was an abuse of power at the FBI,” Gohmert said in remarks after the … Continue reading →
A defeat such as this one can certainly make a party think. If Labour is to ever win again in the UK – and you’d better believe they deeply desire to do so – something will have to change. Maybe … Continue reading →
There are two big competing political dramas going on at the moment. One is the impeachment effort. I’m tempted to put the word “impeachment” in scare quotes, because the grounds are absurdly weak. But since a very real impeachment might … Continue reading →
Remember back in the early days of 2018 when there was the clash of the dueling memos on Russiagate and the role of the FBI and the FISA court applications? The Nunes memo was criticized by Democrats even before it … Continue reading →
…and my perception of his testimony so far is that it is damaging to the FBI and to the Democrats. It will be spun otherwise, of course, by the MSM and the Democrats. And the spin will almost certainly be … Continue reading →
They’ve settled on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Quid pro quo and bribery are out, as is treason. As this commenter at LI writes: Article 2 [“obstruction of Congress”] is a disgrace and a direct threat to the … Continue reading →
As far as I can see (I haven’t read it; it’s very long), the gist is as expected: The IG found justification to investigate the Russia investigation and did not find any “intentional misconduct or political bias.” However, the investigators … Continue reading →