Here’s another recommended article by VDH. There’s so much in it that it’s hard to select just a few quotes, but here are some of special interest to me: The FBI is now, tragically, in freefall. The public is at … Continue reading →
The FBI says that the Twitter files simply reveal business as usual, no big deal: The correspondence between the FBI and Twitter show nothing more than examples of our tradition, longstanding and ongoing federal government and private sector engagements, which … Continue reading →
[NOTE: This post is based on Twitter files #7, which can be found at this link. I suggest you read it, as well as this, which discusses the fact that Twitter was paid by the FBI for its services.] First, … Continue reading →
[Hat tip: commenter “Barry Meislin.”] Alan Dershowitz opines on the Jan 6 committee’s recommendation that the DOJ indict Trump: “In my view, it’s clearly unconstitutional,” Dershowitz said on Monday’s edition of the “Just the News, No Noise” TV show. “Article … Continue reading →
I’m planning to deal with Twitter files #7 at some length in a post tomorrow. But for today, I’ll just link to it again, and add this observation: With the Steele dossier, the FBI and DOJ and MSM and social … Continue reading →
Here’s a Twitter files supplemental from Matt Taibbi. The gist of it is that the FBI started telling Twitter to find nefarious election-influencing foreign actors and had trouble taking “there really aren’t many at all” for an answer. Roth was … Continue reading →
And he graduated from law school a long long time before wokery took over. And yet, he writes this: Elon Musk and his enablers have turned this website into a torrent of ad hominem attacks, lies floated as jokes, and … Continue reading →
The special nature of doxxing is not that hard a concept to comprehend. But the same people who shriek “Words are violence!” when the subject matter is “mere words,” and who demand “safety” from the expression of thoughts they don’t … Continue reading →
[NOTE: I see that Twitterfiles #6 is now up [hat tip: commenter “Griffin]. I plan to deal with it in a post tomorrow.] John Hayward writes: The corruption Musk is exposing at Twitter makes it seem more obvious in retrospect … Continue reading →
[Hat tip: commenter “stan.”] Here’s an interesting look back at the history of the DOJ, and how it’s been a politicized force for a long time – often but not always on behalf of the Democrats. The article includes suggestions … Continue reading →
And this one is considerably more substantive: More here. As Ace points out, it should be made very clear that this would only apply to large – essentially, monopolist – social media platforms and not to other formats like blogs. … Continue reading →
This 6-minute explanation might come in handy someday:
Continue reading →