The Democrats’ mantra is “count every vote,” and the Republicans say “count every legal vote.” That’s part of the difference between the two parties, isn’t it? The first with a “win at all costs” mentality, the second more concerned with … Continue reading →
Here’s a good article on the subject of polls and how difficult it is to do them or to analyze what they mean. I have stopped even trying. And yet I still read articles on the subject, some giving hope, … Continue reading →
Bringing this to their attention might start a few “interesting” discussions: A professor at the University of California-Berkeley is pushing the idea for the creation of a commission after Election Day that will target President Donald Trump and all of … Continue reading →
Commenter “DNW” quotes me, and then asks some questions: [neo]:“I think that one of the basic reasons that socialism and Communism are such difficult ideas to kill is that they appeal to something universally idealistic in regular people” [DNW]: What … Continue reading →
The Hill is far from the most leftist of news outlets in the MSM. Andrew C. McCarthy has an article there on Hunter Biden’s laptap, and in his usual measured way he concludes that the laptop is authentic and the … Continue reading →
They astound me, and yet they shouldn’t. Cognitively, I believe I know why and how these things are happening. Yet emotionally, I find them difficult to believe and astonishing to accept as occurring on such a scale in America. The … Continue reading →
I think Bari Weiss’ new Tablet piece is an illustration of the kind of confusion a great many liberal Democrats feel these days. For example, Weiss puts her finger squarely on the fact that leftist Democrats such as AOC are … Continue reading →
Gilley, a political science professor at Portland State University, is a profile in courage: “I attribute the ease and suddenness of my latest [book publishing] cancellation to this year’s Black Lives Matter moral panic. It has taken cultural totalitarianism to … Continue reading →
Roger L. Simon writes: …[W]hen Twitter announces—via Vijaya Gadde, its “Legal, Policy and Trust & Safety Lead”—their two new principles in the wake of the Hunter/Joe Bidenemail censorship scandal, caveat emptor. The first, about hacked content, is so much eyewash. … Continue reading →
…instead of merely blocking links to that story and others Twitter believes are suspect in some way, Twitter will “label Tweets to provide context.” What will the labels be? Something like “don’t pay attention to this, it’s a lie”? The … Continue reading →
Being of a certain age, I remember Watergate as it unfolded in real time. My recollection is that, although it was slow to pick up steam, by the time of the hearings the nation was riveted by the spectacle. I … Continue reading →
…is that Amy Coney Barrett isn’t just qualified to be a SCOTUS justice, she’s highly qualified and extraordinarily impressive even when under extreme pressure from the opposition. Oh, and also that the Democrats questioning her are an embarrassment to their … Continue reading →