NYC cops are filing for retirement in droves. Logical consequences. Let’s see NY replace them with social workers – right, that’ll work. And if New Yorkers liked the bad old pre-Giuliani era, then they’ll love the roaring 2020s. I wonder … Continue reading →
Today there is good news in a situation that’s been going on for quite some time: The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration acted within its authority when it expanded exemptions to the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) requirement … Continue reading →
…by the values of the right. The rule of law, free speech (which the left also championed when they were a relatively small minority), polite discourse in the public arena, respect for private property. But all that time, the left … Continue reading →
Have you noticed that Judge Sullivan has neither acted nor spoken on the Flynn case since he was ordered to dismiss it? I don’t think the court gave him an explicit time limit for the dismissal, and it’s been nearly … Continue reading →
Seattle sees a steep rise in crime: Durkan’s emergency order booting protesters from the six-block cop-free zone makes mention of the “narcotics use and violent crime, including rape, robbery, assault, and increased gang activity” within the CHOP since it first … Continue reading →
Killings weren’t enough to get Durkan to give the order to take back CHOP. It was only when “protestors” came to Durkan’s house and scared her family that she clamped down on CHOP. Her excuse was the murders in the … Continue reading →
Consider the alternative: vigilante “justice”. Those who think otherwise are either fools or knaves or both – that is, stupid or evil or both. At some point – perhaps after the police are gone or totally corrupt and corrupted – … Continue reading →
…that he has decided to become him. There’s some interesting legal reasoning from Roberts in the case, which struck down a Louisiana law requiring abortionists to have hospital admitting privileges. Roberts was relying on precedent: “The legal doctrine of stare … Continue reading →
Recommended, especially the first half hour or so:
Continue reading →[Hat tip: commenter “Kate.”] As I wrote yesterday, the Flynn framing was their “insurance policy.”
Continue reading →No surprise at all. What is at least somewhat surprising is that a terse note actually has surfaced from our good friend Peter Strzok describing the event, which apparently occurred (also not a surprise) a couple of weeks before Trump’s … Continue reading →
Perhaps. At least, he’s certainly gotten closer to that goal: The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has ordered Judge Emmet Sullivan to grand the government’s motion to dismiss the criminal charges against Michael Flynn. You can read the … Continue reading →