I’m going to start out by repeating something I wrote on November 18 about the election fraud cases [emphasis added]: …I hear amazing allegations [about election fraud] and we just don’t know what’s true and what isn’t. So I’ll just … Continue reading →
This seems to be a big argument at present on the right (see this): have Giuliani and Powell and Ellis presented enough “evidence” of fraud? Here’s a transcript of the text of their press conference, if you haven’t watched the … Continue reading →
In South Australia, people are not allowed to walk their dogs. COVID, of course. Looking at Australia’s figures, it makes no sense at all. Actually, it would make no sense anyway even if the figures were higher. But I guess … Continue reading →
I certainly didn’t know it. But they are; they only date to the last decades of the 1800s: All elections for most of America’s history were organized to be non-secret. They were public events with individual voting occurring in plain … Continue reading →
When Barack Obama ran for president in 2008, he felt he had to distance himself from Reverend Wright once some of the hateful content of Wright’s sermons came out. Obama knew the press would defend whatever Obama said on the … Continue reading →
I hear it was a lulu, but I haven’t watched any of it yet although I intend to. Here it is: Will the MSM cover this at all, except perhaps to say briefly it was a deluded conspiracy theory and … Continue reading →
It takes a long time to even read the fraud allegation news of the day, and for the most part I’m not inclined to pick the information apart in blog post after blog post after blog post. Every now and … Continue reading →
I think Tucker has it right. Despite some bipartisan jaw-jawing about the problem, nothing was done. Please watch this segment: Here’s an article with some of the history. And yet – as Carlson points out – journalists say that reports … Continue reading →
From Caroline Glick: As President Trump said in his remarks Thursday evening, it may take time for the legal challenges to work their way through the courts and determine definitively who will be inaugurated on January 20. But we can … Continue reading →
I haven’t watched this video yet, but I’m putting it up here because it’s been recommended, and I’ve liked these two lawyers’ discussions in the past. I believe the relevant part starts about minute 18:
Continue reading →Here’s an excerpt: If one were to design a system by which a democracy could be subverted, even destroyed, universal mail-in voting (not, of course, normal absentee voting that requires the citizen to request a ballot) would be at or … Continue reading →
The Democrats’ mantra is “count every vote,” and the Republicans say “count every legal vote.” That’s part of the difference between the two parties, isn’t it? The first with a “win at all costs” mentality, the second more concerned with … Continue reading →