Flynn case update: Sullivan’s corruption
About a motion filed by Flynn’s lawyer Sidney Powell asking for Sullivan’s recusal:
Continue reading →About a motion filed by Flynn’s lawyer Sidney Powell asking for Sullivan’s recusal:
Continue reading →Is anyone surprised that this is going on? I’m certainly not, and I bet you’re not either. The dead are receiving ballots – sometimes, the long-dead. Many people are getting duplicate ballots. Some ballots are being thrown out. And there’s … Continue reading →
Of course they do – because they believe (correctly IMHO) that they can get away with it. They do it in unison, even though it’s a preposterous notion to use the phrase in this novel way – to mean appointing … Continue reading →
You can find many posts covering it at Legal Insurrectoin, for example this, this, and this. Barrett seems like a remarkable person, a worthy candidate for the Court. Of course, if the Democrats manage to get the big victories they … Continue reading →
One of the hallmarks of today’s Democratic Party is contempt for the American public – even its own supporters. They are children who must be taken care of, manipulated, and if need be deceived, in order to get them in … Continue reading →
Good. It’s a known gang member who “hates police” and was picked up three days after the crime for another crime. Here’s the story.
Continue reading →…threatens to sue Joe Biden for defamation. As well he should. Have you noticed how Democrats seem to love unjustly smearing white teenaged boys these days? Just ask Nick Sandmann. The thing that makes me most angry about this phenomenon … Continue reading →
Fairly succinct and very clear:
Continue reading →…with this woman? And why does Stanford Law School tolerate her? It used to be that no professor would air this sort of language or these sorts of thoughts in public. There was some notion of dignity to uphold. Now … Continue reading →
This sort of thing is unusual these days on the left: And here I want to be extremely clear. Regardless of what you or I may think of the circumstances of this nomination [Feldman disapproves], Barrett is highly qualified to … Continue reading →
One point of view:
Continue reading →…that Trump’s SCOTUS nominee will be Amy Coney Barrett. That has always seemed most likely. But it’s not over till the Orange Man nominates. And then, of course, it’s not really over till the Senate approves. Actually, come to think … Continue reading →