…it worked so well for Lois Lerner, it will work for me. And perhaps it will. Seems to me, though that it’s a potential felony: While it is not clear precisely when Secretary Clinton decided to permanently delete all emails … Continue reading →
At this point, it’s hard to see how Hillary Clinton survives the onslaught, although stranger things have happened. The email brouhaha getting more serious every moment, and it was already serious enough. You’ll just have to read the whole thing, … Continue reading →
I confess that I am puzzled. I had thought that the press would stand by Hillary Clinton in the same way they’ve stood by Obama through thick and then. There is no question in my mind that Obama has committed … Continue reading →
…go here. It’s supposed to occur at 2:15 PM. I won’t be watching, for the simple reason that as usual I prefer to read excerpts or the transcript, and then watch some clips if there’s anything of special interest where … Continue reading →
More than any previous scandal, the email controversy seems to be threatening to sink Hillary Clinton’s candidacy. But why? One reason is that it is being driven from left rather than right. The MSM usually plays the role of Democrat … Continue reading →
I’m sure there’s some germ of truth in this story, but I can’t figure out exactly where. I’m assuming that the lede is true: The White House, State Department and Hillary Clinton’s personal office knew in August that House Republicans … Continue reading →
Many Democrats are circling the wagons, as is their wont. But so far the flap over Hillary Clinton’s use of private instead of government email for official business while she was Secretary of State has raised two important issues that … Continue reading →
The revelations about Hillary Clinton’s email system are growing more troubling for the left, and in a way more puzzling. For example, we have this article in The New York Times, which seems to be leading the attacks. The headline … Continue reading →
There are two newish problems for Clinton, both related to her tenure at State. The first is the fact that the Clinton Foundation accepted foreign contributions while Hillary was Secretary. The second is that during the time she held that … Continue reading →
Not long after the 2012 election I predicted that Hillary would run in 2016 and that she had an excellent chance of winning. I would currently place her chances somewhat lower than I did then, but still very good. Arguments … Continue reading →
…then why not Hillary? After all, she told essentially the same lie. Isn’t a presidential candidate more important than a newscaster? Yes, and that’s why her nearly identical lie will be winked at: the Democrats need her (they have no … Continue reading →
This changer article by Danusha V. Goska is very hard-hitting and well worth reading. And here’s a companion piece of sorts: As the political project that exists to vindicate the axiom that all sorts of government program X’s can solve … Continue reading →