I know plenty of people who still seem to trust the CDC, and it’s hard to understand why. “Politics” as an explanation covers a lot of territory and goes a long way towards an answer, but it’s not quite enough … Continue reading →
…is being revived. Take a look: The natural-emergence theory has long held the upper hand, in part because of strong statements made by virology experts from early on. “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does … Continue reading →
And at least Canada isn’t North Korea, says Viva Frei. But it sounds pretty bad there nonetheless. The little curfew that grew:
Continue reading →By the time the COVID vaccine was approved for the public, I knew that I was eager to get it as soon as possible. I wanted to be able to do a host of things I hadn’t done in nearly … Continue reading →
COVID is on the rise in India, and our MSM is in full court press to drive panic about it. But what is really going on in that country? I happened to have been at someone else’s house yesterday and … Continue reading →
See this. But it’s okay when Democrats do it, right?
Continue reading →First, the statistics: Since the novel coronavirus began its global spread, influenza cases reported to the World Health Organization have dropped to minuscule levels. The reason, epidemiologists think, is that the public health measures taken to keep the coronavirus from … Continue reading →
Yesterday a friend of mine mentioned that Biden was going to make some announcement today about masks, and I chuckled and asked, “Who cares?” This is what Biden said today on the subject: President Joe Biden, speaking outdoors without a … Continue reading →
No, Officer Sicknick didn’t die from a fire extinguisher to the head, thrown by Trump supporters on January 6th. Nor did he die from an allergic reaction to bear spray wielded by those same protestors. Here’s the actual story as … Continue reading →
In all trials but especially in an emotionally-charged trial such as that of Derek Chauvin, it’s hard to say how a jury will think and what it will decide. That’s true even if you’re aware of the law and the … Continue reading →
I’ve been recommending Andrew Branca’s trial summaries at Legal Insurrection because I think they’re especially clear and yet detailed. Today he’s posted one about the court proceedings last Friday, and once again it’s the clearest article I’ve read about what … Continue reading →
I’ve previously written about the use of the phrase “deadly riots” to describe the Capitol incursion on January 6th, and how it has been employed in order to make it seem as though it was the rioters killing people or … Continue reading →