Here’s Professor Jacobson at Legal Insurrection: …Wisconsin was the clearest case of one judicial problem Trump faced. The remedy was too much for any court to grant. As I cautioned many times, no court was going to disallow thousands (and … Continue reading →
There are no dull news days anymore. Although of course it’s probably about 99% certain that Barr’s career as AG would be coming to an end anyway in a few weeks, he decided to get out of the heat of … Continue reading →
Interesting: While the Democratic electors in the states of Pennsylvania and Georgia are casting their votes for Joe Biden, slates of Republican electors in those states cast votes for President Trump just in case legal challenges succeed. There’s also word … Continue reading →
This chaotic 2020 election and the subsequent SCOTUS rejection yesterday of the Texas lawsuit have highlighted the enormous influence election fraud in big cities in swing states can have on the final outcome of a presidential race. We already knew … Continue reading →
You can read some of the details at Legal Insurrection. Excerpt from the opinion: The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas … Continue reading →
Commenter “I Am Sparacus” writes this about the Hunter Biden investigation: I disagree that this investigation will end up in nothing. The Obama team is not going to let “this crisis go to waste”. They will use it to push … Continue reading →
…can be found here. Recommended reading. In particular: Texas’s lawsuit is a procedural creature differing greatly from the Bush v. Gore case about the 2000 election. Unlike Bush v. Gore, which traveled to the Supreme Court on appeal, Texas’s lawsuit … Continue reading →
I was planning to write a big rumination on the election fraud question and publish it today. But other things intervened, and so it probably won’t happen until tomorrow or perhaps in the next few days. In the meantime, I’m … Continue reading →
In this mess of an election, the topic of fraud has dominated. And with good reason. But other things happened in the election that are worthy of mention. Whether the trends will continue and will become significant in future elections … Continue reading →
Because of course it does: YouTube announced that from Dec. 9 it will block and remove content that contains statements “alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. presidential election.” The Google-owned firm said that it … Continue reading →
Commenter “OBloodyHell” writes (the first sentence of the comment is a quote from a previous commenter on the thread): “Because conservatives do not riot but liberals do therefore it is better to do conservatives wrong then offending BLM and antifas.” … Continue reading →
…with no explanation. According to Jenna Ellis, one of Trump’s attorneys [hat tip: commenter “Molly G”]: The Supreme Court only denied emergency injunctive relief. In the order, it did NOT deny cert. Mike Kelly’s suit is still pending before the … Continue reading →