And speaking of dogs…
This.
Continue reading →neo
The “it’s Ruemmler’s fault” narrative continues apace
White House Counsel Ruemmler was just protecting the president, says the WaPo: But they agreed that it would be best not to share it with President Obama until the independent audit was completed and made public, in part to protect … Continue reading →
Words, knives, guns
It’s hard to find words to describe yesterday’s murder of a soldier by machete-wielding Islamic terrorists in Woolwich (a part of greater London) who hacked him to death, so I’ll just let this article do the talking: Witnesses told how … Continue reading →
Answered prayers
On the thread about the video where the woman found her dog after the tornado, commenter “Randy” wrote: there is a lot of religious blindness on this thread. we celebrate God for answering this woman’s prayer about her dog, but … Continue reading →
But here’s my question…
Why would a postmenopausal woman want to become pregnant with a donor egg or donor embryo?
Continue reading →Issa asserts…
…that Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights. Hmmm. Much more here. Discussion of the law here, and in the comments thereafter.
Continue reading →Ruemmler: the fall gal?
The Obama administration appear to be honing in on a fall guy (girl; gal; woman). It’s Kathryn Ruemmler, White House Counsel, supposedly responsible for hampering disclosures on both Benghazi and the IRS targeting case. A twofer. White House Counsel, White … Continue reading →
Truth and consequences
I don’t read Obama’s mind (more’s the pity; what a scoop I’d get if I did!). But it strikes me that this just may be the first time in his life he’s ever been in such difficulty, the first time … Continue reading →
Lerner takes the Fifth
In a move that was absolutely no surprise at all, the IRS’s Lois Lerner took the Fifth today. What does it mean?: It’s doubtful that any prosecution of Lerner could be based on her disgraceful conduct in allowing the targeting … Continue reading →
Et tu, NY Times?
The NY Times has turned on the Obama administration—at least somewhat, at least for the moment. It may not be the most hard-hitting editorial on earth, but considering the source it’s almost shocking. Something about the DOJ’s treatment of James … Continue reading →
Jay Carney, though the magic of video, foresees his future
[Hat tip: JohnE. at Ace’s.] Carney, speaking in 2006:
Continue reading →“He answered both of them”
Great video, great lady: I also love it when she says to the reporter, “I know exactly what happened here. Exactly.”
Continue reading →