A reminder for those people who say they’ve never seen anything on the world stage like what happened yesterday with Zelensky, Trump and Vance
I suggest they stroll down memory lane with me if they’re old enough – or take a look at a vignette from history if they’re not old enough. I bring you (drum roll please) that wily old showman, Nikita Khrushchev.
I was just a mere wisp of a girl, but well I remember this incident. Although there’s no footage of it and therefore I don’t remember “seeing” it, I certainly heard a great deal about it. The setting was the UN and the year was 1960:
The alleged shoe-banging incident occurred when Nikita Khrushchev, First Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, pounded his shoe on his delegate-desk in protest at a speech by Philippine delegate Lorenzo Sumulong during the 902nd Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly held in New York City on 12 October 1960.
Khrushchev at a meeting of the UN General Assembly on 22 September, three weeks before the incident
In 2003, American scholar William Taubman reported that he had interviewed some eyewitnesses who said that Khrushchev had brandished his shoe but not banged it. He also reported that no photographic or video records of the shoe-banging had been found. However, in his biography of Khrushchev, he wrote that he accepted that the shoe-banging had occurred. There is at least one fake photograph …
So we even have fake news photographs, way before AI.
More:
On 12 October 1960, head of the Filipino delegation Lorenzo Sumulong referred to “the peoples of Eastern Europe and elsewhere which have been deprived of the free exercise of their civil and political rights and which have been swallowed up, so to speak, by the Soviet Union”. Upon hearing this, Khrushchev quickly came to the rostrum, being recognized on a point of order. There he demonstratively, in a theatrical manner, brushed Sumulong aside, with an upward motion of his right arm—without physically touching him—and began a lengthy denunciation of Sumulong, branding him (among other things) as “a jerk, a stooge, and a lackey”, and a “toady of American imperialism” and demanded Assembly President Frederick Boland (Ireland) call Sumulong to order. Boland did caution Sumulong to “avoid wandering out into an argument which is certain to provoke further interventions”, but permitted him to continue speaking and sent Khrushchev back to his seat.
According to some sources, Khrushchev pounded his fists on his desk in protest as Sumulong continued to speak, and at one point picked up his shoe and banged the desk with it. Some other sources report a different order of events: Khrushchev first banged the shoe then went to the rostrum to protest. Sumulong’s speech was again interrupted. Another point of order was raised by the highly agitated Romanian Foreign Vice-minister Eduard Mezincescu, a member of the Eastern Bloc. Mezincescu gave his own angry denunciation of Sumulong and then turned his anger on Boland, his provoking, insulting, and ignoring of the Assembly President leading to his microphone being eventually shut off. This prompted a chorus of shouts and jeers from the Eastern Bloc delegations. The chaotic scene finally ended when Boland abruptly declared the meeting adjourned and slammed his gavel, named Thor’s gavel, down so hard he broke it, sending the head flying.
Pretty impressive as a public brouhaha, IMHO.
It wasn’t Khrushchev’s only such performance at the UN, either:
This incident should not be confused with an earlier one at the General Assembly, on 29 September, when Khrushchev angrily interrupted Harold Macmillan, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, banging the desk and shouting in Russian, at which Macmillan drily said “I should like that to be translated, if I may.”
Oh, for a little bit of that old-fashioned British dry humor.
When I saw the title of this piece I immediately thought of the shoe incident before opening the link. I was too young to be aware of it at the time but read about it a few years later.
Along with the shoe goes the trip to a commonplace supermarket.
I remember the story of the shoe-banging. Was it at that time he said, “We will bury you,” or was that another occasion?
I think the supermarket visit was Boris Yeltsin.
Ah. I looked it up. The “We will bury you” comment was at a reception for Western ambassadors at the Polish Embassy in Moscow, four years before the shoe-pounding incident at the UN.
It looks like the “bipartisan group of legislators/Senators” in favor of the war continuing who met with Zelensky before his meeting in the Oval Office–presumably far less able to influence events than when Biden was President–may have given Zelensky false expectations, and bad advice on how to approach Trump, never emphasizing that “since there was a new sheriff in town,”–a whole new approach–that Zelensky had to approach and deal with President Trump in an entirely different way than he did Biden. *
* See https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/bipartisan-group-rinos-democrat-senators-met-zelensky-blew/
Snow on Pine:
Zelensky should have realized that himself.
Neo, I think Z thought that he could control the meeting. Sometimes an Ego isn’t the best.
Que up Trump
imo President Trump showed more patience and respect for Zelensky than Obama was willing to show for a closer ally, Netanyahu.
Perhaps Zelensky’s foreign policy team tried to warn him, but Zelensky arrogantly ignored them, because he figured he was the one who had a real understanding of the situation. He demanded aid and pushed Biden around, and Zelensky thought that he could use the same tactics on Trump.
And, as I commented above, perhaps his American fan boys (deliberately?) also gave him exactly the wrong advice.
The Gateway Pundit isn’t exactly top tier in credibility, IMO. Fool me once, shame on me ..
Of the three involved, who again had the bigger ego, and is the best statesman? Time will tell.
Here’s my go-to mob guy, Michael Franzese, on the exchange:
_______________________________________
Trump does not want to put the American military in harm’s way because of Ukraine.
So what does he want to do? He wants an immediate ceasefire because, as he said, hundreds of thousands of people are dying—many innocent people are dying.
“Let’s stop the war.”
Yet, Zelensky comes over here with an arrogant attitude—not realizing, not expressing, not even being grateful for the fact that this war could have been over in two weeks, three weeks, two days—who knows—if America hadn’t supported them. But instead, he comes here demanding that Trump and Vance do something they don’t want to do at this point.
Let me tell you something—if you want to bring your enemy to the table, what do you do? Do you start badmouthing them and pushing them away? No.
I’ve learned something on the street, my friends. Years and years of negotiations with guys I didn’t like—guys I knew would have put a bullet in my head if they had the chance. How did I negotiate? The best way to defeat your enemies is to make them your friends.
So what is Trump doing? He wants to bring Putin to the table so they can get a ceasefire and, eventually, an end to the war. And yet, Zelensky is demanding that he badmouth Putin?
Do we want to go to war? Do we want another world war?
Of course not. These are nuclear superpowers. It’s time to negotiate.
That doesn’t mean you’re in bed with somebody. It doesn’t mean you love somebody. It doesn’t mean they have their thumb on you.
–Michael Franzese, “Emergency Livestream: Zelenskyy vs Trump, DOGE, Epstein Files, Elon Musk”
https://youtu.be/OCdsP8GNtWk?t=640
_______________________________________
Franzese was put into for solitary for three years. A guard gave him a Bible, he became a Christian, and now he runs a YouTube channel and does outreach programs particularly for youth.
So we are dealing with three mobsters and murderers?
One certainly.
One ex-comedian.
One, our President, neither a murdered and not always funny.
If you think you can befriend Putin, well, stay away from windows, make your own tea, and don’t fly on anything he has a hand in.
Just an item of trivia, about N. Khushchev’s (sp?), shoe rapping-
I think- in the non-fiction travel book by John Steinbeck, “My Travels With Charley”, John Steinbeck, Steinbeck and a man he met [in a place like a diner], talked about the shoe rapping event.
Their conversation went something like this:
The man- “I saw a lot of magazine pictures, of Khushchev doing that shoe rapping thing, and you know what?…[when you look at the photos of Khushchev’s back- he’s banging on the table, and still has BOTH of his shoes on!] How strange!”
John Steinbeck- “Yeah, he didn’t [use one of his own shoes, to do that silly stunt].
I guess he borrowed one of his flunkies’ shoes, to rap on the table,…or maybe he snuck a shoe…wrapped up in a paper bag, into the building, like he was pretending his little shoe was a submarine sandwich, or something.
How strange.”
Re: Interview with Nina Khrushcheva about Zelenskyy-Trump exchange
Synchronicity strikes. Nina Khrushcheva, great-granddaughter of Nikita “The Shoe” Khruschev, was interviewed on “Face the Nation.”
Khrushcheva received a Ph.D at Princeton, taught at Columbia and is now Professor of International Affairs at The New School. In spite of such grooming, she’s actually somewhat sensible.
_____________________________________
Face the Nation: I want to bring in a professor in the Julian Jay Studley Program at The New School and great-granddaughter of a former leader of the Soviet Union.
Nina, great to have you on with us. Let’s start with the reaction to what happened in the U.S. What kind of implications did today’s events have on a global scale?
Khrushcheva: Well, we’ve never seen such a blowup in the White House. That’s something that was unimaginable until this moment.
But I’m sure everybody is basically shocked and saying the same thing. It doesn’t look very good for Volodymyr Zelenskyy at this point, because as Donald Trump said, he doesn’t have the cards—and he really doesn’t.
So, the question is whether Zelenskyy will want to repair the relationship, which is going to be very hard because it has been breaking down over time. In fact, today’s meeting happened only because Emmanuel Macron, who was here earlier this week, convinced Trump to meet with Zelenskyy. Trump didn’t want to do it.
Face the Nation: How is that relationship going to be repaired?
Khrushcheva: We’re getting closer to something that has been speculated about for at least the last month—longer, even—since Trump was elected. The question is: Will it be America against Europe? That would be absolutely unheard of.
America has been the leader of the Western world, the primary member of NATO. So now, we may see more fractures. Europe might realize it needs to create its own international, military, and policy agenda and accept that under Trump, the U.S. is not going to be the same kind of partner it once was.
At this point, they may just try to maintain some kind of relationship with Trump to avoid further damage rather than hoping for closer cooperation.
–“Face the Nation”, “Khrushchev’s great-granddaughter reacts to heated Trump-Zelenskyy meeting in Oval Office”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHUunIZaRX4
I saw the shoe incident and the ” we will bury you incident. What did Nikita do during WW2?
Sennacherib:
Khrushchev had an interesting history. For one thing, he was literally Ukraine-adjacent. From his Wiki page:
Khrushchev later did a lot of Stalin’s dirty work in Ukraine.
About WWII:
He helped Ukraine rebuild after the war.