Gibson’s Bakery wins lawsuit against Oberlin
If you read Legal Insurrection regularly, you’ve probably been following their in-depth coverage of the trial in which a long-time family-run business in the town of Oberlin, Ohio, sued the college. The verdict is now in, and the plaintiffs have won:
According to our reporter in the Courtroom, the jury awarded $11 million. Here are the details: Allyn W. Gibson was awarded $3 million, David Gibson $5.8 million, Gibson Bros. $2,274,500. Next Tuesday there will be a separate punitive damages which could be a double award (meaning tripling the $11 million to $33 million).
Go to the link for the details. Professor Jacobson writes:
The verdict sends a strong message that colleges and universities cannot simply wind up and set loose student social justice warriors and then wash their hands of the consequences. In this case, a wholly innocent 5th-generation bakery was falsely accused of being racist and having a history racial profiling after stopping three black Oberlin College students from shoplifting. The students eventually pleaded guilty, but not before large protests and boycotts intended to destroy the bakery and defame the owners. The jury appears to have accepted that Oberlin College facilitated the wrongful conduct against the bakery.
More from post-trial statements:
Lee Plakas, who handled much of the month-long trial and who gave the closing argument, said this case “is a national tipping point.”
“What the jury saw is that teaching students and having them learn how to be upstanding members of the community is what colleges are supposed to do, not appease some students who they are afraid of,” Plakas said. “People around the country should learn from this, that you can use the legal system to right the wrongs, even if the one doing the wrong is some huge institution who thinks they can do anything they want.”
Roger Copeland, a retired Oberlin College professor of theater and dance, was in the courtroom and seemed ecstatic after the jury came back with their verdict. Prof. Copeland is somewhat famous in the courtroom for getting this response on a Raimondo text to co-workers after a letter-to-the editor he wrote was critical of the school for their handling of the Gibson’ affair. “Fuck him,” Raimondo responded in a text message about Copeland. “I’d say unleash the students if I wasn’t convinced this needs to be put behind us.”
“I’m exhilarated by this verdict,” Copeland said, whose wife Michele worked at the school in food service and testified she was under orders by the school to cut the business off from the cafeteria bagels and pastries they provided because of the student unrest.
“What is most amazing about this trial is that the public was able to see what the process really was in how the school goes about its business,” Copeland said. “It’s almost like the mask has been ripped off the face and we can now see what the face really looks like.”
Much much more at the link.
Oberlin claims it was just defending students’ free speech rights (which is kind of funny, coming as it does from SJWs). That would, however, be a good defense—except that the plaintiffs proved to the jurors’ satisfaction that Oberlin’s participation in the campaign against Gibson’s (based on false accusations) went far beyond that.
I followed the coverage on Legal Insurrection closely. I have to say: I was amazed at the arrogant tone the defense posture took with Gibson’s. It obviously did not play well to the jury. After the ‘expert’ testified that Gibson’s 125-year-old business was only worth 35K, I knew they would lose.
Brilliant win on a hard-to-win defamation case. Oberlin richly deserved to lose. I hope the punitives are harsh. (And I’m not a plaintiff oriented dude.)
Just, wow.
In the early 1970s, one of my brothers went to Oberlin, and I went to Grinnell, which was no better. This kind of black political activism was common then, and the colleges went out of their way to support it. It’s like a comet coming back with a curse.
Even if Oberlin has to pay 33 million dollars this time around, it won’t break the pattern that these colleges are locked into. The colleges’ political, social, and intellectual identities are tied up with leftist activism. Without activism, the colleges lose credibility; they become just a bunch of spoiled white rich kids with high SAT scores.
And the black activists will be happy to see the college pay millions. Most of them want to ruin the college as much as the bakery. That’s nothing to them. They all think they’re in training to destroy Amerika and capitalism.
The black students have gotten insanely radical in recent years.
Here is another example.
Students at Dartmouth were studying for finals. Why did the black students not feel obliged to study? This is a consequence of Mismatch, a result of unprepared students who are accepted to colleges they are not prepared for and in which they fail. The results include grade inflation, fake majors like “Studies” majors and finally rage at the system because they know they are failing. They don’t actually fail, of course, like flunking out., They just don’t learn anything, and know it.
Finally. Though it’s a long shot, but maybe other colleges will learn from Oberlin’s 11 million mistake.
That ought to set Oberlin back about 0.02% of their next tuition hike.
It may not surprise you that some of the materials used in courses taught by Meredith Raimondo contained “views that are intolerant of Israel and Jews”. Wherever SJWs go, the oldest hatred follows.
http://www.thetower.org/3205-new-controversy-swirls-at-oberlin-around-appointment-of-interim-dean-of-students/
I’m hoping this is the start of a long-needed trend. And that Mr. Sandmann’s attorneys rip CNN and WaPo a new one.
Black activist students, not all black students.
Although, the Oberlin student body being the Oberlin student body these days, I would wager that nearly all the students there–white, black, Hispanic, Asian, Jewish, Muslim, native American, Pacific Islander, and whatever other categories I’ve no doubt left out—are leftist and radical.
I said “nearly all.” It’s not all. See this, for example.
Excellent result!
I did not even know about this case until a couple of weeks ago but then went back over LI’s coverage to get an idea of what was going on. While it was clear Oberlin put up a very poor defense the award was still far beyond what anyone was considering, and they have not even gotten to the punitive damages yet. A stunning and very welcome outcome. Hopefully this will help make come true Instapundit’s mantra, “Get woke, go broke”.
Well, f*ck you, Raimondo. Not too surprising her response given her bio on Emory’s site.
*Oberlin’s site
It does seem a new wind is blowing. State changes in society can happen rapidly. See, the Sixties.
The SJWs may be about to discover the arc of history is not their friend. They’ve been over-reaching for a long time.
This is indeed good news.
What would make it even better would be if the court directed that none of the judgment could be paid by whatever liability insurance Oberlin has. Nor could it be paid out of their general endowment. Rather, the entire amount must be paid out of the budget of their office of diversity and inclusion, or whatever Orwellian name they use. If, as one would hope, this budget is exhausted before the debt is satisfied, the remainder be paid out of the budget of every single department with “studies” in the name.
I know this is far beyond the court’s discretion; but it would be true justice.
“It may not surprise you that some of the materials used in courses taught by Meredith Raimondo contained “views that are intolerant of Israel and Jews”. ”
I’m shocked, shocked
“I know this is far beyond the court’s discretion; but it would be true justice.” (i. e. insurance not paying)
It may not be in the court’s discretion but it might be in the insurance company’s. I don’t really know all the ins and outs but there is some speculation in LI comments that the situation might not be covered. In any case as someone else pointed out if the insurance company *is* on the hook for it they will obviously not be too thrilled and will take measures with Oberlin to prevent it from happening again i. e. insist they show a little more backbone to the SJW contingent.
Insurance policies name the perils covered, and those not covered. I suspect that, from now on, perils involving “malicious” “stupid” “irrelevant to education” are going to be looked at closely in designing the next contracts offered to colleges. With, of course, premium adjustments upward.
Even if the U wins in court, the expense of defense can be substantial, and that, too, might be subject to certain “malicious, etc.” limitations.
These arrogant clowns didn’t think discovery would be a problem, so they didn’t settle. I suppose they figured that when their peers found out how low they’d gone, it would be seen as praiseworthy and woke. The jury…meh. Then, afterwards, they released a letter about how the jury missed the “clear evidence” (non existent) and came to the wrong answer. The jury may have heard about this ….which is interesting since the punitive amount has yet to be determined.
Own goal. Foot shot. And they still don’t get it.
American “mob justice”. Gotta love it. Now people know what abolitionists felt speaking out against slavery in 1830s.
“What is most amazing about this trial is that the public was able to see what the process really was in how the school goes about its business,” Copeland said. “It’s almost like the mask has been ripped off the face and we can now see what the face really looks like.”
Jupiter and Ketu helped uncover all the secrets.
Though it’s a long shot, but maybe other colleges will learn from Oberlin’s 11 million mistake.
Colleges won’t improve until the professors learn humility. Which includes the STEM professors as well.
there is some speculation in LI comments that the situation might not be covered. In any case as someone else pointed out if the insurance company *is* on the hook for it they will obviously not be too thrilled and will take measures with Oberlin to prevent it from happening again i. e. insist they show a little more backbone to the SJW contingent.
This is an interesting aspect of the case. I spent years on committees of hospitals I was practicing in. One old argument about doctors not policing their profession was that the doctor who was being policed would often sue. The hospital had a general liability insurance for such cases but the problem was that the lawyers for the suing doctor would always allege that the action taken was out of personal spite/ competition, etc. This meant that the doctors doing the policing would have to hire their own lawyers. That gets expensive and discourages participation.
What if individuals at Oberlin were egging this on ? Could they be liable for personal suits ? Might they not be covered by insurance?
Anyway, I can hope this is the first robin of spring.
I’ll have to keep an eye on Dean Meredith Raimundo’s career. U Miss eventually fired Melissa “We some muscle over here” Click for her rabble-rousing.
Though Click didn’t miss a beat and is now a professor at Gonzaga U, a Roman Catholic school. One might think her career would have been set back further, given how competitive college teaching positions are, especially in a subject as vacuous as “Communications.”
I suppose it would be too much to hope Oberlin will be hurt as much financially as U MIss has.
Hopefully, the corporations, institutions, and other deep pockets will reassess their capitulation, “taking a knee”, to the diversity racket.
I had not read about the trial until now and went over to LI to see. I think Raimundo is in deep trouble. Oberlin may take the hit but she is an obvious target. The Gibson lawyer did a spectacular job on Day 2 when he produced document that she circulated and asked her to sign them. Oberlin made a huge own goal when they refused to settle.
Oberlin has been revealed to be an institution of indoctrination rather than of education.
Parents take note: send your children somewhere else (for example, Hillsdale College).
I hope that this award will not be watered down by the appeals process.
And it’s very likely Oberlin’s insurance won’t cover the cost of the settlement.
Let us hope and pray that Oberlin’s insurance will not shield them from the financial consequences of their deliberate actions.
Their insurance has already indicated, months ago, they were likely not going to cover Oberlin if they lost. They had filed a 42-page intervention motion detailing their position. The motion was denied, but it will serve as a very strong basis for their declining coverage.
Oberlin thus has nothing but bad options: pay the judgment, appeal the judgment (and risk spending more money and lose again), or sue their insurance company (which, again, will be very expensive.)
Popcorn, please.
Notice that Meredith Raimondo is Dean of Students. I don’t know whether it’s widely know outside of academia but that office (sometimes Student Affairs, Student Life, etc.) is frequently very openly and vigorously left-wing activist. I’m tempted to say “almost always,” actually but I’m not sure if that’s accurate. More so than the faculty at large, I think. It’s responsible for the non-academic side of students’ affairs at the school–housing, extracurricular stuff, etc. Often run by people with thin or no academic credentials. I wonder what Raimondo’s PhD is in.
wiki says Oberlin has an endowment of $887.4 million. Can they write a check (not that they want to) out of the endowment?
Oberlin is not an Ivy but it is ranked pretty high.
#30 (tie) in National Liberal Arts Colleges
#16 (tie) in Best Undergraduate Teaching
#91 in Best Value Schools
#16 (tie) in High School Counselor Rankings
#21 (tie) in Most Innovative Schools
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/oberlin-college-3086
Re what Mac said above about the dean of students office in academia being “frequently very openly and vigorously left-wing activist”. That reminded me of just how bloated the number of administrative staff in educational institutions is now — from a piece in Forbes last year:
FOAF on June 8, 2019 at 12:20 am said:
…A stunning and very welcome outcome. Hopefully this will help make come true Instapundit’s mantra, “Get woke, go broke”.
* * *
Someone needs to make a collection of The Wisdom of Instapundit.
As Mike said, we can hope this is the first robin of spring.
Cake bakers and florists take note.
I gather that the problem was not that the college doesn’t control its students (who can?), but that they egged them on, with direct intervention by an officer of the university.
Yes, we can tolerate some degree of incivil and unjust behavior in our society, but no civilization can survive when that intolerance and persecution becomes the majority’s pastime.
“One old argument about doctors not policing their profession was that the doctor who was being policed would often sue.” – Mike K
I always wondered why hospitals put up with incompetent physicians, rather than getting rid of them (and schools, teachers; etc.).
That particular wrinkle had not occurred to me.
Kind of sounds like the Caine Mutiny Courtmartial set-up.
Still, there ought to have been some clear criteria for termination that the “policers” could use in their defense.
On the other hand, some trial verdicts make you wonder if the jury is smoking something in the backroom.
Hooray for these Twelve again!
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/06/accountability-for-oberlin.php
Indeed.
My only quibble is that normal people are encountering the insanity far too often now, through news reports if not personally, and are pushing back against it where they can.
“Fuck him. I’d say unleash the students if I wasn’t convinced this needs to be put behind us.”
That’s my favorite bit. Oberlin may have lost the case on that alone.
The “Chronicle-Telegraph,” the local paper to Oberlin, ran an article on Oberlin’s loss. I read through much of the comment section. A student, CNM, responded and attempted to defend Oberlin students in a poor-mouth, poorly informed way. CNM was good enough to hang in and debate, but acquitted [reflexive pronoun here] poorly.
CNM: As a student, we deserve to be miserable. This will put financial strain on our school which is ALREADY in debt, and therefore make it more difficult for students to afford oberlin. Incoming students who werent even a part of this whole mess at that. Gibsons is not really struggling, they just make it seem like they are, and in reality it is frustrating that people do not seem to understand who Oberlin students really are, which is a wide variety of young people just trying to get a good education.
http://www.chroniclet.com/Local-News/2019/06/07/Gibson-s-Bakery-v-Oberlin-College-More-than-11-million-awarded.html
Of course, Oberlin is not in debt, but is running a deficit, the lawsuit in no way hinges upon Oberlin’s financial state though the financial harm to Gibson is germane, and Gibson has been hit hard enough to lay off about a third of its employees.
Not to mention the outright, undocumented libel that Gibson was a “racist establishment with a history of racial profiling,” on a flyer, which Raimondo, the Dean of Students and a college vice-president helped distribute.
It’s a shame but no surprising how poor CNM’s critical thinking skills are. No doubt a testament to the first-rate education Oberlin provides to its students for hefty fees.
What do Evergreen College (WA) and Oberlin College (OH) have in common? Doctors of Diversity in the administration that will burn it all down (their places of employment) to get the “man” and further “justice.”
How does that song go? “We didn’t start the fire ….” Oopsie, chickens came home to roost.
We didn’t start the fire
It was always burning since the world’s been turning
We didn’t start the fire
No, we didn’t light it, but we tried to fight it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p3DzUwxI0o
–Billy Joel
om: That’s a deeper song than you may think.
Joel wrote it after he heard a 21 year-old complaining about how crazy things were in the late 80s as though no previous humans had ever had to endure living in a crazy world.
The above link plays the song with a great historical video clip accompaniment.
History, Stephen said, is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.
–James Joyce, “Ulysses”
A consummation devoutly to be wished! *applause*
.
From Legal Insurrection, at Neo’s initial link, boldface mine:
*The actual shoplifter, and two students who joined in to support him at the time of the shoplifting. Oberlin decided the three were being discriminated against by Gibson’s because of their Negro, or part-Negro, ancestry: in other words, because they were “black.”