This is a first for neo-neocon
I thought it was high time for this blog to host its first picture ever of Kim Kardashian.
Apparently Kim and the father of her child got married over the weekend. This was what Kim and one of her sisters wore to a pre-wedding dinner. Kim looks like she was interrupted while getting ready for a Tae Kwon Do class and misplaced her belt, whereas sister Kourtney is very covered up, with an extra large ruffle on the posterior.
And is that Captain Hook in front and to the right, head hidden by shrubbery? He will not find the crocodile here:
For comparison:
The New York Post’s take is:
“Two jackasses got married in Italy Saturday. Sex-tape star Kim Kardashian, 33, wed egotist Kanye West, 36, in a wedding opulent enough for Florence’s Medici dynasty and tacky enough for reality TV.”
http://www.newser.com/story/187430/post-on-kim-kanye-two-jackasses-got-married.html
After another brief paragraph, it concludes, “The republic still stands.” But the snarky, disaffected tone belies just how exhaustive the Post’s coverage of the wedding has been. A quick search of the paper’s site reveals at least 17 pieces related to the wedding, including a look inside the rehearsal, the bachelorette party, and the ceremony itself–along with an equally snarky “toast” to the couple.
http://www.newser.com/story/187430/post-on-kim-kanye-two-jackasses-got-married.html
Haha, TKD.
The Japanese overcoat, formal overcloat, has the two half-vest pieces that overlap. SO with no belt or buttons tied, it would look spread out like the first pic.
The second white dojo wear is closed down, so people may not be able to visualize it if they haven’t worn that type of arrangement.
But that’s why Neo’s comments are funny about the first pic. Although I thought she was mentioning the pale cream one at first.
Now I can say that you have well and truly arrived, neo.
Brava! [golf clap]
From the expected lifespan of your standard celebrity marriage (the length of time it takes Dominos to deliver plus the number of days until the full moon) we must now subtract one month for each million wasted on this circus, and one week for each “close friend” who dishes the dirt before the bridesmaid dresses are even off, and a day for every jilted lover of either or both parties who’s already talking smack to the tabloids.
I give it a few months, or at the very most, until the mini-kimi becomes a terrible two, a natural disaster than could wreck any marriage. Kim and Ye both wanted to be famous for being famous, let them live with the consequences.
Modern fame: Your mother pimps your p0rno video to the internet, and you start having public flings with all sorts of trashy people, and the next thing you know, you’re a millionairess. As long as you keep flashing the public, of course.
Gross.
WHEW…! Ya wanna see what I truly fear that The Young American(Cough)Male has become: Check out the spikey haired, gray-suited girly-boy with his hand on Kourtney’s back. WHEW..!
Other than the “reality” show, how does that family make money?
NeoConScum,
And yet that’s what “the ladies” seem to want these days. Compare/contrast:
-Female-driven societal standards (?) = the guy above.
-Male-driven old-school = a smooth mutherf***er like Don Draper.
But maybe I’m reading too much into this.
Indeed, Hollywood is kimoi, disgusting, pukishly ugly and rotting of death and malice.
The Left’s beauty is ugliness personified, but I guess that’s a matter of taste and ethics. If you like making little girls into public whores so that homosexual actors and rapist directors can get their shot at the young thing, maybe that’s beautiful artwork and movie making….
A few thoughts. Maybe the ladies do prefer the the male who can be dominated physically and psychologically. That may indicate that our society is safer than most people realize. (still, back in the dark ages when I was flying with the airlines, it was clear that the FAs were very protective of the homosexuals (now Gay) fellows. I never really figured that out. A little non-PC story. In the van from the Boston airport one night, the driver said “I see you don’t have a FAG with you tonight”. The girls were incensed; but he hastened to say “what’s, wrong? I only meant a ‘Flight Attendant Guy’. Being insensitive the other pilot and I roared and incurred the disapproval of the crew.”
Change of topic. I presume everyone saw the picture of the lovely Duchess of Cambridge’s dress blowing up and revealing her perfectly formed posterior. Now, I am quite old and not up to date, but someone please elighten me. Is it fashionable for fashionable women not to wear underwear these days? Have I missed something, I should not have? Is there a thong which is not visible?
To extend the idea. I was in Brazil many years ago and saw thongs galore on Copoacabana Beach. Most women should not wear thongs in public.
Wretched excess to the max.
Matt and Oldie… ROTFLMAO…!! (*As the i-Thingy twits would say-text-hashtag.*)
So, I had to google “Don Draper” and find that the slickster is wearing—GASP—Aviators. I gasp, as the Ray Ban Aviator has been my regular specks-rim since 1969.
Along with NOT being capable of ‘getting’ the palid, spikey haired boyos of today, I am INCAPABLE of ‘getting’ tweety, Facey, etc. I recently ordered from Barnes & Noble, “Facebook & Twitter for Seniors for Dummies”. Figured it could s’plain to me what I’ve been missing. Nope. The first chapter was so sleep provoking that I gave up and returned to my Lescroart suspense thriller, “The Keeper”. Ya know, with paper pages to turn and stuff.
A 1944 ‘baby and just fine with it. ((-:
Pingback:Snark of the Day: Neo-Neocon - BitsBlog
I thought it was high time for this blog to host its first picture ever of Kim Kardashian.
Please spare us. If I want to see pictures like that I’ll watch the Wendy Williams show on TV. I cannot believe people actually care about what Kim does.
They are worshipping their Sex Goddess. Of course they care.
Paging Thorsten Veblen! Paging Thorsten Veblen! Please meet your party at the papparazi counter!