AOC and freezing eggs
LBJ bared his belly to show us his appendix scar.
Too much information.
AOC has bared hers to show us her quest to freeze her eggs in order to preserve her chances to have children. Also too much information. But certainly more interesting information, considering that this is a practice – purposely delaying conception and using medically-assisted means in an effort to get pregnant later at the “right” time – that has become more common.
AOC says:
“Maybe in life you can’t have everything,” she says. “But here’s the secret: You can have a hell of a lot.”
AOC is herself a good example of maximizing a gift for gab and a little bit of undergrad-type knowledge and gaining a position of some power, perhaps to gain even more. She’s thirty-six years old now and had been keeping company with a boyfriend of at least a decade, although they’ve now broken up:
… she also is single, with The New York Times reporting that she has split from her long-term fiancé and college sweetheart, Riley Roberts. …
… Now she finds herself at 36, still beautiful, considered youthful by the standards of the day, but with ovaries that stubbornly remain in nature’s grip. From the age of 35 a woman’s fertility falls off a cliff.
AOC is trying to outsmart the process by using hormone injections to force her ovaries to emit six to 10 eggs at once which are then removed and frozen in the uncertain hope that they can be successfully thawed and fertilized when she’s ready to become a mother.
The rest of the article discusses the difference between left and right on child-bearing and abortion and Having It All. It also contrasts AOC with Karoline Leavitt, who at 28 has two children and a great career but is leaving to spend more time with her baby and toddler.
What interests me more is whether AOC is giving women (and perhaps herself) false hope that conception can be almost indefinitely delayed and yet ultimately be successful. But even with egg-freezing that can definitely extend the window of possibility, actually having a baby gets more and more difficult and there are costs both monetary and in terms of health. The drugs involved to induce hyper-ovulation are disruptive and potentially damaging. The chances of successful fertilization and implantation get lower and lower as times goes on, no matter at what age the eggs were frozen. Pregnancy itself is more difficult and hazardous as a woman gets older. And then of course there’s the question of whether a partner or husband is ever found. Although a woman can go it alone with donor sperm, that’s still another difficult decision.
The other day I was watching an interesting podcast on these sorts of issues, and so here it is:
[NOTE: The article characterizes AOC as “still beautiful.” You may disagree. I happen to think AOC is a very attractive woman. I also think that’s part of her electoral success. If she weren’t attractive, I’m not at all sure she’d have been elected in the first place or would have such a large following today.]

Her physical beauty is a large part of her political success, in my opinion. She’s also become very adept at publicity and media influence. Her mental processes don’t match her appearance, alas.
AOC is OK looking IMHO, not a great beauty. That is, of course, in the eye of the beholder. YMMV.
Your wory about the ‘false hope’ is all too well-founded, I’m afraid. This is an old problem, though. Hollywood female celebs were feeding this iffy perception 20 years ago.
LBJ’s gall bladder, but yeah, didn’t need to see it.
The actress has aspirations no doubt, aspirations that don’t include being white-boy-arm-candy. Woke 1 was so crazy, right? Well, it’s obvious she’s getting ready for woke 2, and white boyfriend might be too much for woke 2.
…As if they’re not going to double-down.
@ Neo > “If she weren’t attractive, I’m not at all sure she’d have been elected in the first place or would have such a large following today.”
She would never even have been selected as a candidate; moderate pulchritude and banal platitudes are all she’s got.
It’s been a long time ago when she was first elected; I don’t remember what the news reports / speculation were about her “finders and funders” – it’s a cinch she didn’t make it on her own.