Home » Another political changer

Comments

Another political changer — 4 Comments

  1. The fact that he decided he could no longer be a Democrat but is not a Republican is gutless. By not voting for a viable alternative to the Democratic candidate he essentially continues to support the party he insists no longer represents him. He might as well have remained a registered Democrat and just not voted. If he thinks he’s making a principled stand he’s sorely mistaken. If he believes in what he’s saying he owes it to himself to vote — in a meaningful way — against the people who have taken over his former political home.

  2. F; SHIREHOME:

    I’ve never registered as a Republican except for primary voting. I’m not gutless. I have voted solely for Republicans since 2004, however. I don’t particularly want to join a party.

  3. “It believed government could improve people’s lives without becoming the center of them.”

    Um….that’s not the Democrat party I’m familiar with. Perhaps he was in a different one?

    Even if that was their intent (and I don’t believe it is or ever has been), please name one government program that has “improved people’s lives without becoming the center of them.”

    I’ll wait.

    There’s a reason that charitable donations are consistently so much higher amongst Republicans. Republican altruism is expressed in giving their own money for worthy causes. Democrat “altruism” is expressed by taking other people’s money to filter through 15 layers of bureaucracy that skims 80% off the top, and bestowing the remainder on a public that has come to depend on it for survival.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics