Home » The courts and the Virginia referendum: redux

Comments

The courts and the Virginia referendum: redux — 8 Comments

  1. Senior Fellow Ken Cuccinelli joins @CNN as the legal fight heats up over Virginia’s redistricting referendum: “There’s some very basic processes in the Constitution for amending the constitution that Democrats ignored. They were ignoring the will of the people in how they brought this forward. And now we’re going to have this decided in the Virginia Supreme Court.

    I wouldn’t be surprised to see a 7-0 ruling throwing this out.”

    https://x.com/i/status/2047336514485457008

    See link for 2:45 video clip

  2. Like all government officials, the Virginia S.C. Justices take an oath of allegiance to the US Constitution. A failure to rule that this redistricting is clearly unconstitutional would in effect be a declaration that disenfranchising nearly half of Virginia’s voters is not unconstitutional… As such, such a ruling would also be in fact, a violation of their Oath of Office. The DOJ should prosecute every judge who is in clear violation of that oath.

  3. @Geoffrey Britain:the Virginia S.C. Justices take an oath of allegiance to the US Constitution.

    Doesn’t matter in this case. The US Constitution does not tell states how to draw their districts. Now, they should rule that it violates the Virginia Constitution, but unfortunately state Supreme Court justices have ruled their own constitutions to be unconstitutional before. If the Virginia Supreme Court lets this go there’s probably nowhere to go for relief.

    a declaration that disenfranchising nearly half of Virginia’s voters is not unconstitutional

    They’re not “disenfranchised” just because they’re not in a district where the majority agrees with them. Hyperbole doesn’t do any good here, neither does trying to use the argument the Dems use against our gerrymandering. The issue is not what the result was, it was if the process was or wasn’t followed. Voters can amend their state constitutions in all kinds of damned-fool ways and frequently do; they can’t be protected from themselves unless you want to get rid of voting.

  4. The measure was passed by election fraud like every other election controlled by the lying, cheating election stealing shit bags.

  5. Chases Eagles: “lying, cheating election stealing shit bags.”

    Don’t go so easy on them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics