Home » Roundup

Comments

Roundup — 7 Comments

  1. So US “allies” have to be dragged, kicking and screaming to do something that is in their own best interest.
    It takes a loud mouthed, Queens, NY real estate guy to compel (the joke that is) NATO to do something.

    Of course, do any of the NATO nations have the resources to help keep the Strait of Hormuz open?? We will see.

    You can bet that Putin is looking at this and he has to conclude that NATO is a paper tiger. If he was not tied down in Ukraine , his army would be marching to the Baltic nations.

  2. JohnTyler: I think in this case, the missing “resources” are glandular rather than kinetic.

  3. I think Rutte has had his proverbial “come to Jesus” moment with POTUS Trump & knows Europe is toast without US military, political, & economic commitments to its future. He’s desperately swimming upstream against the hate-America-but-love-your-leftists Eurocrats. AND he probably knows, but can’t say the quiet part aloud, that much of Europe is already lost to Islam…and the next shots fired will be near his backyard.

  4. I believe that France and Italy have very good Frigates that could be used in the Strait. Sweeden, Norway, Finland have Navies that could help. We will see.

  5. I call bullshit on NATO “working together to determine the best way to secure the strait”.

    Dither, dither at best.

  6. @JohnTyler,

    Yeah, about the “rare reluctance” of some NATO members, + some other USA allies, to provide [money or resources], when [the M + R] are needed or requested, to be paid:

    In a 1920s [?], George Gershwin, musical play, [it’s a play with a fictional plot, everyone]- the wife of The USA president asks USA’s allies/diplomats [to pay back the USA…money given to the Allies by The USA, so that the USA’s Allies could fight + win World War One].

    …When she asks them to pay back this money, this money…also called [the war debts], the diplomats reply with messages like:

    ” …Gosh. We don’t understand you, or English, all of a sudden!

    …No capisce.

    …No comprendo.

    What did you say?

    …I guess that we are [very] dumb, today….whenever you mention MONEY, you know that it’s very funny…, we respond:

    …No capisce.

    …No comprendo.

    What did you say?”

    [I’ve paraphrased that dialog, from the play, that I think is named- “Of Thee I Sing, Part 2”.

    The above issue, that’s mentioned in the play, was written as comedy, but in my opinion, regretfully- this type of dialog to the USA’s Government is more [of a common event], rather than [a funny, fictional, comedy event].

    That’s how things go, I guess. *shrugs*

    Cheers. 🙂

  7. Amnesty International actually noted back in July that Iran had been using these banned weapons.

    The United States also uses these “banned weapons” and has not agreed to the international treaty that “bans” them. We’ve also transferred them to Ukraine to be used there. I think we last used them ourselves in 2009.

    Cluster munitions are legitimate weapons with clear military utility, as they provide distinct advantages against a range of threats in the operating environment. Additionally, the use of cluster munitions may result in less collateral damage than the collateral damage that results from use of unitary munitions alone.

    Since the inception of the 2008 policy, in the midst of extended combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, we have witnessed important changes in the global security environment… Our adversaries and our potential adversaries have developed advanced capabilities and operational approaches specifically designed to limit our ability to project power…

    Although the Department seeks to field a new generation of more highly reliable munitions, we cannot risk mission failure or accept the potential of increased military and civilian casualties by forfeiting the best available capabilities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics