Home » DeSantis proposes property tax relief

Comments

DeSantis proposes property tax relief — 7 Comments

  1. Property taxes are wealth taxes. It’s an extremely bad idea to tax wealth. In fairness, this particular wealth tax does a good job of targeting people connected to the community.

    One of the problems with wealth taxes is that the metric for wealth is more malleable, or uncertain, than other metrics for say, income or sales. Worse, conceivably a person could experience higher taxes one year for ephemeral wealth gains that might disappear in another year.

    How did we get property taxes in the first place? I’ve commented on this in the past. The Constitution does not allow for federal wealth taxes, or at least it didn’t before the income tax amendment. (Can they squeeze a loophole into the 16th amendment??) But property taxes are state or local.

    We never had property taxes even at the state or local level until the panic of 1837 and the following great depression into the 1840’s. Even then, in the earlier phases there were no property taxes. The dubious solution to the debt problem that a number of states experienced was to stiff the lenders. Mostly Brits. The Brits weren’t having it, and eventually we got property taxes as a result.

    While a number of states did have severe debt crises in that time period, not all of them did. Yet, we ended up with all states having property taxes. I wonder how that happened exactly? (Taxes as an infectious disease? Ha!)

    America’s First Great Depression: Economic Crisis and Political Disorder after the Panic of 1837 Hardcover – Illustrated, April 15, 2012
    by Alasdair Roberts (Author)

  2. to be a bit more accurate, property taxes _did_ exist before 1837, but in a very different form. They were not a standard amount levied automatically over and over forever. Rather, a levy was a one-time tax that would get voted for and it was generally levied on property, land and buildings, because frankly thats the easiest thing to tax and its not something you can pick up and move somewhere else, or hide, etc. but besides poll taxes , ad-hoc levies on property did exist and were used to raise the funds for various things, as needed. they weren’t recurring rates to be paid forever, though. .
    and lets never forget the other glaringly obvious difference between those days and these days: government at all levels was vastly smaller then. we need to get back to _that_ idea and the problem of onerous extractive taxation will disappear almost on its own.

  3. As a resident of Fl I hope this goes through. The homestead exemption helps but one must wait several years for it to have a large effect. For us in a new house we are hit with a bill about 3k higher than our neighbors even though the houses are assessed similar. They’ve owned for 5 years and for the homestead there’s a depreciation.

  4. Don’t forget that someone has to pay for local schools and local roads – both for initially producing them and regular maintenance. There are also local governing boards that have salaries that have to be paid. All paid by real estate taxes…although I’d agree that the amounts should be a flat predetermined rate, not necessarily based on the ever changing expected price of real estate.

  5. Our PT goes up every 2 yrs, after reevaluations. Two yrs ago it was a real disaster. Rates went through the roof (I see what you did there), and a lot of protests. We have a process to go through to protest, but it really doesn’t work well. There is no real, fair way that they work out your house value. We have Homestead exemption, but it hasn’t gone up in years. Older people can be taxed out of their homes.
    As for the comment about what PT pays for, yes that is true. But, they keep coming back for more without trying to cut or hold expenses. School district always asking for more money, for the kids. But the kids see little of it. Instead it seems School District keeps staffing up new departments.
    Tabor is almost gone. We are really catching it in the shorts.

  6. We’re having the same debate in Texas. There’s lots of interest in eliminating property taxes on homes, but not much attention given to how to raise funds to operate the government, since we don’t have state income tax here. Normally the idea seems to be sales tax, which at least has the advantage of being a tax on consumption rather than one on either earnings or wealth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>