Elizabeth Warren tries to explain/deny the coverup of Biden’s cognitive decline, and utterly fails
Well worth watching, and it’s only about a minute long. Warren tries mightily but is defeated by the topic. Note her almost involuntary smile at 0:15, and the interviewer’s expression at 0:22:
If you watch a clip today, let it be this one of Elizabeth Warren stumbling all over herself as she’s repeatedly pressed on why she lied about Joe Biden’s senility. pic.twitter.com/pyMjQjAaUo
— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) April 22, 2025
That’s pathetic. She lied, he knows she lied, and she knows he knows.
I have long proclaimed my profound contempt for the likes of Sen. Warren.
She does nothing in this clip to suggest a change of perspective on my part.
The interviewer was controlled but the message got through. Nicely executed.
“What are we gonna do now?” — Warren
Move along. Nothing to see here. The past is past. Let’s focus on the future.
How convenient.
She lied, he knows she lied, and she knows he knows. — Kate
I saw a clip of Bill Maher recently. I’m not aware of the exact context, but he said that he was somewhere and told the truth. He knew what he was supposed to say, and that everyone on the Democrat side wanted him to say it, but he told the truth instead. And now everybody hates him for it.
Do we even need the context? This is how things work on the left now. Strict adherence to the narrative. I recall being flabbergasted many years ago, during the Clinton admin. I’d guess, when political people began to talk openly about “their narrative” in the media. This was when creative types like the Bloodworth Thomason’s were members of the Clinton admin. Why tell the truth when something more appealing can be concocted?
No one would ever accuse Sen Warren of being the brightest bulb in the chandelier.
John+Guilfoyle (4:29 pm) is (unfortunately) on target . . . Honest Injun!!
TommyJay (4:07 pm), did that Maher clip, or one that was very analogous in what comes through to us two, have to do with Maher’s recent (and somewhat controversial) dinner engagement with President Trump? Maher was expected by the left to echo the usual “uncouth, monstrous Trump is Hitler” assessment, whereas in fact, Maher found the President to be cordial and affable when the two interacted one-on-one.
I can’t believe that this subject has devolved into gotcha interviews of individual Congress members or members of the media. (And “tell-all” books, of course.)
For two to four years (I think it was all four), someone who wasn’t the elected president was running the Executive branch. Many of us knew it was happening but were told constantly that our prejudices were the problem, our perceptions were inaccurate, our partisanship rendered our observations untrustworthy. Some were deplatformed over it. Before the debate, no Democrat in public life – and damn few Republicans – EVER expressed the thought that maybe Biden wasn’t in charge – at least, none that I ever heard of; every single one went along with what anyone with eyes and ears could tell was a lie.
After the debate, they split: some briefly tried to brazen it out, whereas others pretended to be shocked – at first, at how swiftly Biden must have declined, since they had been commenting on his acuity just days or weeks before, but now, now, they can safely aim their shock at “staffers” who somehow successfully hid from them what we could all see from the living room sofa.
This is seriously the story of the century, isn’t it? The election of a Potemkin president who could not serve, the successful establishment of a secret Politburo (the membership of which we still don’t know), and the complicity of all of Congress and almost all of the media in the deception? But what do we get – an interviewer’s skeptical look.
Musk made a comment that makes me think that Liawatha may not have covered her tracks all that well and she acts like she knows it. There is so much we don’t yet know that has been hinted at. Waiting for the season ending double episode where all is revealed.
She is such a worm.