Trump’s wild and crazy Gaza proposal
Did you see it coming? I did’t see it coming. The “it” I’m talking about is, of course, Trump’s announcement yesterday that the US plans to take over Gaza, evacuate its people to some Arab country or countries, and rebuild it into a fabulous place. This is not only a total surprise, but it’s especially a surprise from Trump, given his devotion to the US not getting all that involved abroad.
So, what gives? The consensus on the right – a consensus I share – is that it’s Trump thinking so far outside the box that he’s on another planet. Why would he do that? In order to point out some truths. These are those truths:
– There is no 2-state solution possible.
– Gaza is physically a wasteland and must be rebuilt by someone.
– The Gazans are really part of the Arab world and not a separate entity.
– The Gazans are incapable of having a peaceful state alongside their neighbor – actually, neighbors, because neither Egypt nor Jordan want any part of them. Nor does anyone else on earth.
– The UN has been worse than useless and is actually part of the problem.
– If the Gazans go back to Gaza there will be an endless cycle of war.
What to do? I haven’t a clue. But I do think that Trump’s goal is to get a conversation going in which at least some people around the world acknowledge those hard truths and stop pretending otherwise. We’ll see what happens.
Meanwhile, of course, the usual suspects are very very very upset, as you can see by the world’s condemnation of Trump’s proposal. Apparently they’d rather keep the Palesinians as perpetual refugees and perpetual Jew-murderers, in a wasteland of ruin.
Here’s what Alan Dershowitz had to say last night about it:
Israel/Palestine is an exceptionally difficult problem and has been for my entire lifetime. No matter how much I’ve thought about it, I’ve never come up with a solution. Trump’s “we’ll take over Gaza and rebuild it while relocating the Gazans” seems stark raving mad at first. But again, I remind myself that’s it’s one of those wild opening bids that may end up merely sparking Egypt and Jordan and some other Arab nations to help deal with the intractable problem of Gaza/Hamas and not just kick the can down the road as before, business as usual.
It’s his opening move. Lets wait and see where it goes.
As neo said, these theatrics may force people to see the truth most are blind to–that the Arab world wants to keep the “poor Palestinian refugees” where they are and as they are as a means of propaganda and secondly, that the Arab world doesn’t want any part of the “Palestinians” in their countries, as they will inevitably cause trouble. As long as this doesn’t ultimately lead to the US taking them in, I have no problem with it.
Are you not entertained?
–“GLADIATOR | “Are You Not Entertained” Clip ”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yD0XIowNAG8
I’m somewhat reminded of Eisenhower’s dictum — if I have a problem I can’t solve I make it bigger and the solution comes to light very quickly — or words to that effect. Make it bigger. Widen it out. See the surrounding constraints for the obstacles they are.
Convincing Egypt and/or Jordan to take the Gazans in will be difficult. If I remember correctly, it didn’t go too well last time Jordan took in some Palastinians. But who knows? Certainly a lot more seems at least possible with Trump doing Trump things. He tends to warp reality by merely voicing ideas that at first glance may seem crazy, but they encourage people to think about unconsidered possibilities.
When I got up this morning, checked Feedly, my news aggregator, and saw this story, I felt like I had slipped into an alternate timeline of history.
I hate it when that happens.
If you aim to do the impossible you can’t do what everyone thinks you should do. Hotels, casinos, golf courses owned and built by Arabs would give Israel a good neighbor. Crazy? Probably, Oslo and terrorism isn’t working for anyone so why not?
In the various dour reactions to Trump’s necessarily vague proposal, I’m also reminded of my Dad’s IBM desktop plaque: Think.
@Nonapod:If I remember correctly, it didn’t go too well last time Jordan took in some Palastinians.
Jordan has millions of them right now, has had them for decades. They didn’t do anything like Oct 7 in Jordan. We’re not hearing a peep out of them. What is not going well, from the perspective of terrorism?
I don’t know how well or badly those Palestinians in Jordan are treated, according to UNRWA only 18% of Palestinian refugees in Jordan even live in the camps.
I saw some photographs of the Gaza beachfront, pre-0ct 7, and it looked to my Floridian childhood eyes like prime real estate next to the pier in Daytona Beach.
Are you not entertained? Ha! That’s not exactly a compliment.
I suspect that most reasonable “Palestinians” have long since left Gaza and the “West Bank.” They now live in the US and Europe, and other parts of the Middle East — including Israel.
If the residents of Gaza had REALLY wanted “peace,” they could’ve long ago gotten it and built one heck of a resort on the Mediterranean. All they want to do is kill Jews and obliterate Israel.
If the Gazan Palestinians can be separated into smaller groups, it’s possible they’ll lose some of their unifying Jew-hate when other issues confront them. And they’ll be easier to control.
Borders have two sides. Inside looking out and outside looking in. The smaller the area, the greater the ratio of border to area, which gives, say, the Egyptians greater and faster access to any issues or potential issues within.
And certainly, the storied infiltration by Mossad will be part of the program.
I am entertained – and it’s spectacular.
Trump is very good at not settling for half-assed solutions. Neo’s litany above is exactly right, and any “solution” other than Trump’s is just warmed over crap that hasn’t worked in the past. That said, SHIREHOME is right of course. This is just setting the table properly, but I give Trump credit. I believe the end game is to fundamentally change something that hasn’t changed in over 70 years.
Ha! Now I listen to Dershowitz and hear him saying “Think!”. Jumped the gun, by golly.
I’m also reminded of my Dad’s IBM desktop plaque: Think.
Which reminds me of its spinoff: Thimk.
https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/1/0513/21/thimk-dec-1958-mad-imitation-magazine_1_659109056c202bd9958c16181ad70be4.jpg
yep
https://x.com/AcrossTheBay/status/1887185059846754597
is it ‘an open air prison’ or not,
now I don’t trust mr witkoff, because his judgement is very gullible,
It was pleasing to see the President call out Caroline Glick for praise in his presser with Bibi last night. She is already making a difference, which for those who follow her work isn’t surprising in the least. Rock on, woman!
Okay, let’s take Trump’s idea a bit further. More practical, or more outside the box?
Gaza’s current population is an estimated 2.1 million (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1422981/gaza-total-population/).
As of January 1, 2025, the population of Nigeria is estimated to be approximately 232 million (https://countrymeters.info/en/Nigeria).
About half of Nigeria’s population is Muslim, and they’re concentrated in the northern part of the country. Most of them currently live under Sharia law, which would make Gazans happy.
Nigeria is already the world’s sixth most populous country, and their growth rate is among the world’s highest. They could easily absorb all the Gazans, who might swamp a smaller country like Jordan.
Meanwhile, Trump could turn Gaza city and beach into a Mediterranean resort … and a US territory with yuuuge army, airforce, and naval bases. For once, we’d have true neocolonialism. The logistics of defending Israel would be greatly simplified, and the resort city would make it all profitable. Too much winning.
Trump is the first US President to openly admit that the “peace process” resulting an a two-state solution will never work. Previous Presidents may have admitted that it hasn’t worked yet, but have–at least in public–held out the hope that it will eventually work.
It will be interesting to see where this wild idea goes, if it does. Egypt really kept its thumb on Gaza when it was in charge there. Of course, it also treated Gaza residents badly. If the UAE, for instance, could be brought to look at building a new Gaza as a business opportunity, or if Egypt did so, something might be possible. A Muslim power could suppress radical Islamists without the international uproar caused when Jews or theoretically Christian powers do so.
Trump’s idea is crazy but I think it’s less crazy than expecting this problem to be solved by repeating the same mistakes of the last 70 years. I think more countries need to be involved in accepting some refugees from Gaza, preferably some countries that are further away from Israel than Egypt and Jordan. How about Mauritania, Morocco or Indonesia? The Gazans need to be in a place where they can spend their time thinking of something else besides plotting their next attack on Israel.
The “palestinian” issue is not intractable; it is not even a difficult problem. It is merely that nobody was willing to do what is required to remedy it. It was started by the USSR, which used Arafat and his supporters as a tool against the western allies. After the USSR was dissoved, the western allies continued to treat the palestinians like they were still supported by the USSR, and the palestinians got it into their heads that they were insulated from attack just as they had been when the USSR was extant. It’s all been a sham and a fool’s game. The solution to the problem is simply to eliminate the problem; Trump just made that crystal clear. There will no longer be “palestinians.” The idiot, self-destructive “palestinians” set the stage for this resolution by stupidly attacking Israel on October 7, 2023. They gave Israel and by extension, the world permission to eliminate them. Once removed from their nesting/breeding place, they will find their political influence as dispersed as their physical location. Problem solved.
Steve (retired/recovering lawyer):
Of course it’s not intractable, if one is willing to go draconian. But that isn’t the way the western world works anymore.
Cornflower, not Nigeria. Our “step daughter” lives there so I follow the news from there. There’s a civil war going on in the Eastern part of the country between the Christians and the Muslims, surprise. The Muslims attack a village, kill the men, steal the women and girls as sex slaves, and burn down the church. You can find photos of heavily armed soldiers guarding churches.
Ultimately, the problem is Islam. Samuel P. Huntington called it Islam’s bloody borders and should have added its bloody interior as well.
Haven’t read it yet but am about to: Lee Smith, TabletMag, “The End of Palestine”.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/israel-middle-east/articles/end-of-palestine
Turn it into a ‘Dubai on the Med’ & have the Arabs finance the renovation.
I think this proposal exposes the Arab world’s duplicity when dealing with “Palestinians”.
When Jordan, Egypt and even the Saudi’s try and deflect on reasons why resettling Gazans in their countries, it will be harder for the West to keep the blame on Israel for the intractable nature of the problem. The West always demands it’s Israel that makes the concessions.
President Trump made it clear in his press conference (if I heard him correctly) that Israel will be bystanders in this effort. The US will play the lead, but it will be the gulf states that make it happen.
I was listening to a former IDF soldier on the issue and he said Israel doesn’t want Americans to soldier the burden of security. But I don’t think Trump sees the IDF with a role. It will be Gulf states security along with European countries.
Part of the key to this is sanctions strangling the Iranian economy. Is that possible? Lowering oil prices would have a similar effect. How long will it take for US energy production to materially affect oil prices? o
Can this work? History would say no way– but who thought the Abraham Accords possible? It does take some of the pressure off Israel in the short term.