Home » Biden issues a slew of pardons for exactly those you’d expect

Comments

Biden issues a slew of pardons for exactly those you’d expect — 22 Comments

  1. Such a projection, he is saving his family from frivolous lawsuits that his administration has done to thousands of Americans.
    It won’t go well in history

  2. I suspect that’s an indicator that the J6 committee and its staff destroyed evidence.

  3. Frivolous?
    The Biden criminal syndicate is internationally connected, well entrenched, eminently creative and corrupt to the core.

    To be sure, why SHOULDN’T Decent Joe & Family make a buck (or two) for serving his country (and other countries) so loyally?

    File under: Offshoremen union.

  4. Any member of the Jan 6 committee still sitting in Congress should be censured and expelled from Congress.

  5. There are already calls to subpoena some of these who have received pardons, and they will not be able to stand on the Fifth Amendment for acts for which they have been pardoned.

    I think that politically it would be best for Trump to pardon all J6 defendants on the grounds that their charges and trials were tainted by the corrupt Biden/Garland DOJ, and then get on with the business of getting the country back in shape.

  6. What about the Biden grandkids? And Hallie Biden, Beau’s wife & Hunter’s main squeeze after his brother died? They all received bankwire $ from foreigners too. Just asking.

  7. Biden’s actions are a stain on the republic and his presidency. But they might be a blessing in disguise for Trump and those of us who want him to succeed. Why bother focusing on retribution when all of the offenders have been pardoned?

    If they still want to proceed, maybe one of these:

    (1) Indict Joe for his shenanigans as VP and then compel all of the newly-pardoned to testify to the grand jury, as neo noted, without the benefit of the 5th amendment. If Hunter, Jim, or anyone else lies to the grand jury, indict them for perjury/obstruction.

    (2) Investigate Milley, Fauci, et al and, if they find anything on them, indict them anyway and challenge the breadth of the pardons. Argue for a limit on the pardon power that requires that there be notice of what crimes have been pardoned. Assuming that there is anything on Fauci and Milley, this is a win-win if handled well. If the pardons are overturned, then justice is served. If they are not, then the public is further exposed to Democrats’ bad faith. (One downside of this is that the 5th amendment comes roaring back as soon as the state announces that it is challenging the pardons.)

    If either avenue is pursued, Trump needs to wind it up and then stay the heck out of the way and let Bondi handle it. No tweets. No public statements beyond plain vanilla platitudes such as, “we are confident that justice will be served.” Not that he would, or even could, but he should.

    Frankly, I think the best choice is to just have Trump spend a few days tweeting links to Liz Cheney, Kinzinger and all of the others opining in 2020 about how accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt and then get on with governing the country.

  8. He also pardoned all US Capitol Police and DC Metro Police who testified before the J6 committee, likely so they can avoid perjury charges. I believe that will also let Micheal Byrd skate on murder charges after shooting Ashli Babbitt. I hope some lawyer can be found to pursue a wrongful death claim against him.

  9. I have seen an X post from Alexander Vindman’s wife moaning that he did not receive a pardon.

  10. These blanket pardons will be ruled invalid. If not the judge can be arrested, taken to a military base where someone with a blanket pardon from Trump invites the judge to reconsider unless he or she wants a hole in face they weren’t born with. Then the lightbulb will come on. Indicted, found guilty or pled guilty. Otherwise scenario 1 is inevitable.

  11. I, too, question the validity of these pardons. How can a person be pardoned without a crime or conviction? I’d really like to see a SCOTUS ruling on such pardons.

  12. If you’re pardoned for a crime, how can you please the Fifth?

    Did a pardon apply to civil matters?

    Kate: regarding Vindman — Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

  13. By the end of a century, I’d expect a dog or cat whose online videos were cute and funny to be elected president. Or maybe an AI program with an attractive avatar. Sure, we’d know that they wouldn’t be making any decisions themselves, but aren’t we used to that after four years of Biden?

  14. By the end of a century, I’d expect a dog or cat whose online videos were cute and funny to be elected president.

    Abraxas:

    It’s easy to be cynical.

    But as cute and funny as Kamala was this time and with more than twice as much campaign funding, she lost and Trump won.

    The American people can be fooled for a while, but not forever.

  15. Dax:

    Biden has memory problems. He’s shaky on his feet. His mind wanders at times. He has word retrieval problems. In short, he’s been declining and has many cognitive challenges. But he’s not so far gone that he doesn’t know exactly what he did with these pardons, and why.

  16. Lee Also:

    My post was unclear on that point due to bad punctuation (comma instead of period). I fixed it now.

    None of them can plead the Fifth for federal matters that might involve federal crimes. But they could still plead the Fifth – I believe, although I’m not certain – for matters involving possible state crimes. And they still could be liable for civil lawsuits. At least, that’s my understanding.

  17. This doesn’t mean they can’t be called to testify. And now they can’t plead the Fifth regarding federal crimes. What’s more, they could be liable for committing perjury during such testimony.

    Yes. Brilliant.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>