Home » Criminal illegal alien? You’ve got a home in Denver

Comments

Criminal illegal alien? You’ve got a home in Denver — 23 Comments

  1. “The mayor of Denver isn’t the only one asserting a city or state’s ‘sanctuary’ status, but he’s threatening armed resistance.”

    So-o-o, would such “armed resistance” constitute [-gasp-] *insurrection*?

    (Perish the very thought?)

  2. Send in the Army? I’m amazed that these idiot politicians giving sanctuary to these violent criminal gangs think these people are going to be expelled peacefully and without a fight. No, they’ve just landed in the promised land and they’re going to fight to stay here, and by “fight”, I mean with guns.

    I expect this misguided attempt to give sanctuary to these criminals will further move the Democratic Party towards its well deserved demise. This will be a PR disaster of the first order, just wait and see.

  3. Johnson is so full of crap it is oozing out of his ears. First, I call bullshit that 50k city people are ready to defend their city. With what? Unless they armed up prior to 2013…

  4. Really??? He would deploy the DPD to use force against the feds. Doesn’t this violate all sorts of laws up to treason?

    As for the citizen’s resistance, well they do what they want and face the consequences of civil disobedience.

    Denver sure has changed from when I grew up there.

  5. Time will tell whether the Denver mayor and others of his ilk are that divorced from the new reality or virtue signaling with no intent to make good on their threats. If I were Tom Homan, proclaimed sanctuaries would be first on my list of targets.

  6. As a native of Colorado, the Californication of the state has been
    disgusting to see.

    I have many relatives in the state. Most are Democrats, unfortunately.
    They seem to believe that allowing undocumented aliens into the country isn’t a big problem. The crime, drugs, sexual trafficking, and stress on schools and hospitals don’t register with them. 🙁

    Here’s an article that delineates the way blue states and cities are going to fight back against the deportation plans.
    “Bonta said his team has prepared briefs on several immigration issues that Trump mentioned on the campaign trail. including mass deportations, birthright citizenship, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and sanctuary cities.

    “There will be pain and harm inflicted by him. It is not all avoidable, but to get to our immigrant communities in ways that are in violation of the law, they’re going to have to go through me, and we will stop them in courts using our legal tools given to us,” Bonta said.” Bona is the California AG.
    Read it all:
    https://abcnews.go.com/US/immigration-litigation-prepared-advocacy-groups-democratic-leaders/story?id=115915848

  7. I am sitting right now in the city of Glendale, surrounded by Denver. Denver almost went broke last yr because of the illegals. Johnston bused some to other CO cities. There might be a lot more that would welcome the Feds. A lot of local Hispanic citizens can’t be happy with illegals getting all the bennies, while help for them is nonexistent. Denver also has a very large Black population, that aren’t happy either.

  8. J.J.:
    It’s really frustrating that the west coast transplants seem to have taken over the state. Sadly, the state will become even more blue when Trump moves Space Command to Alabama.

  9. So, the dreaded Highland Moms, “a group of citizens who organized donation drives for immigrants,” will arm themselves and confront Federal authorities??

    What is their Venn diagram overlap with Antifa?

  10. Obstruction anyone? Time for AG Bondi to pull out the federal obstruction statutes and find the one that applies to state and local officials who interfere with federal law enforcement?

  11. @ Bauxite > “pull out the federal obstruction statutes”

    IIRC, the last time the Democrat feds cried “obstruction,” it was to stop states which were trying to ENFORCE the actual immigration laws.

    I don’t know about the Highland Moms, but I would suspect very few of them are armed and dangerous. They would be deployed by the Democrats to stand in the way of Trump’s forces and dare them to shoot.
    Setting up a Kent State, more than a Tiananmen Square, situation.

    Judging by the current armed security in some of my stores in a different suburb city near Denver, I don’t think our municipality is going to be on-board with Mayor Johnson’s agenda.
    (I commented on that recently, but don’t remember which post.)

    Along with Neo’s bunch of questions, I have never gotten a really satisfactory answer to why Democrats are not willing to at least obstruct the entry of and/or deport actual, adjudicated (or clearly guilty) rapists, murderers, and gang/cartel members (big overlap in the Venn diagram).

    It seems to me that meeting conservatives (including other Democrats) “halfway” on that issue would have diffused the anger of a lot of their members who ended up voting for Trump because of the Biden Inc Immigration Invasion’s impact on their own lives.

  12. Like a good leftest, the mayor’s heart bleeds for the currently useful downtrodden masses, while not giving a damn about the mayhem unleashed on individual citizens as civilized society is destroyed. The deportations are going to happen because it’s the will of the people. The mayor will regret standing in the doorway.

  13. AesopFan – The issue with Obama and AZ was more about the discretion of the President to see enforcement priorities, not obstruction. Well, the presidency is on the other foot now.

  14. I lived in Colorado from the late 60s through the 80s and experienced firsthand, and relatively often, Chicano racism toward whites, supremicist thinking, and violent (and rampant) criminality. I cohabited with my wife-to-be in a house located in a majority Chicano neighborhood and had frequent dangerous encounters with our racist belligerent Chicano neighbors. I was loath to take shit from them, and that attitude nearly got me killed on more than one occasion. I finally convinced her to sell her house and she did, and we moved to the much safer (and anglo) Washington Park neighborhood.

    Sorry, but I don’t like . . . “those people.” Experience is a hard teacher.

    Now more than ever I want the southern border sealed and illegal aliens deported.

  15. Trump should gather up 50,000 illegals from elsewhere and drop them off the mayor’s residence.

  16. When did it become the duty of American politicians to put illegal aliens ahead of American citizens?

  17. An aspect of this is indubitably what Mr. Sailer refers to as ‘leapfrogging loyalties’. The professional guilds from which the Democratic Party draws its candidates are simply TWANLOC. (Recall Peter Sztrok’s commmentary on Walmart shoppers). That aside, illegal aliens are clientele for some of those same occupational guilds and fodder for the Democratic Party vote farm.

  18. The Denver situation (and similar cities) will be a key test for the incoming Trump administration. Similarly, we’ll see what they do when the first federal judge rules that deportations are unconstitutional. As I recall, at the outset of Trump 1.0, some judge ruled thusly after some rather mild border enforcement was put into place. And that was the end of that. Hope this time is different.

  19. @ Art Deco > “The professional guilds from which the Democratic Party draws its candidates are simply TWANLOC”

    Frank Hood is a regular commenter at Sarah Hoyt’s blog.
    https://frank-hood.com/2024/11/09/titles-of-nobility/


    Why does our recent election remind me of this? Both during and, especially, in the aftermath of this election, there has been much talk of “the out of touch elites” (by Trump supporters) and the “deplorables, garbage, or ultra MAGAs” (by Harris supporters). At the end of this essay, I’ll discuss terms, but, instead of elites, I think the more appropriate word is aristocracy. Our last president without an Ivy League degree was Ronald Reagan. For nearly 40 years, our Presidents and Supreme Court Justices have come exclusively from Ivy League universities. Likewise for many of the opinion writers and “experts” cited by them. A typical cabinet meeting might as well be a Skull & Bones reunion. Over the last 40 years, these people have formed their own society at the top of the urban hierarchy in trendy urban neighborhoods. The only time they see someone from outside their Ivy League alumni circle is when they need a plumber or a gardener.


    In America, you can be a failure, and, if you’re born poor are more likely to be, but you can never be a peasant. Americans may have sympathy for you if circumstances or fate conspire against you, but, deep down, the American belief is that you are responsible for the circumstances of your own life. The new American would-be aristocracy does not believe that, but the average American does. That is one of the fundamental divides in this country. The “elites” believe compassion requires them to take care of the poor, the addicted, the petty criminals because their circumstances inevitably led them to that tragic circumstance. The “deplorables” believe that most of the time your circumstances are due to your hard work and talent, or your fault for not working hard enough, or sacrificing, but instead taking the easy way out with drugs or government handouts. That’s why the “elites” think the “deplorables” are racists and bigots, and the “deplorables” think the “elites” are snobbish jerks who want to make life worse for those poor who strive to better themselves.
    Can you see how they fail to understand each other?

    Now, some clarity on terms.

    Elite—no, rather Aristocracy—in the standard American phrase, the “elite” were born on third base and think they hit a triple. They think the poor can’t help their miserable conditions, so they need to be taken care of. In their worldview, to think otherwise is to believe the poor need to be crushed. The typical urban aristocrat views the government as the dispenser of compassion. The rural American views the government as “force” in George Washington’s terms, not compassion. When a hurricane strands their neighbors, they gather their resources and set out to rescue them. They see the government instead put up barriers to that because the “peasants” might do it wrong (accidentally of course, not their fault, they just don’t see the nuance that the experts see). The rural American sees the government as taking his money in taxes and giving it to the degenerate who’s likely to break into his house and steal from him or shoot his child on the street in a robbery.

    Capitalism—no, rather Free Enterprise. Capitalism is a slur invented by Karl Marx. Perhaps it applies to currency manipulators like George Soros or stock traders like Warren Buffet, but it does not apply to Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos, or Elon Musk. The latter are people who build things, and yes, they need to accumulate capital to do it, but the system that allows them to do that is freedom. Free enterprise allows you to create things that people want and to get them to willingly part with their money to make their own lives better. It’s not wrong for you to make a profit off that. You build a successful electric car company, profit handsomely, and build a rocket company. You use your better rockets to put up a satellite network that supplies rural areas with high speed access to the web, rather than spend $3 billion in taxes to run cables to Coyoteville, Wyoming.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>