Home » What went wrong in the Harris campaign? Maybe the dogs just didn’t like it

Comments

What went wrong in the Harris campaign? <i>Maybe the dogs just didn’t like it</i> — 21 Comments

  1. The dogs for damned sure didn’t like it:

    My name is Boffer Bings. I was born of honest parents in one of the humbler walks of life, my father being a manufacturer of dog-oil and my mother having a small studio in the shadow of the village church, where she disposed of unwelcome babes.

    Oil of Dog, Ambrose Bierce

  2. whats that shakespeare line ‘full of sound and fury, signifying nothing told by an idiot,’ it takes skill to earn such a total repudiation, so the question was did the campaign exists, or was it a simulacrum of one,

    it had the appearance of a campaign, they had a convention, they had delegates, they had celebrity endorsements, they had appearance here and there, but the engagement wasn’t really there, not with the press, not even with real life human beings, her responses were akin to a derivative AI

  3. This is the mirror image of what I mentioned before the election. Since it was lost by a narrow margin, any small interest group can plausibly claim that if only their pet cause was paid more attention to, the election would have gone differently.

    The socialists are saying the Dems weren’t socialist enough, the race hustlers are saying the Dems didn’t offer enough to race hustlers, the feminists are saying the Dems weren’t feminist enough, the people who wanted a different candidate are saying a different candidate would have won, etc.

    Just as if the Republicans had lost, the Dems are in danger of learning the wrong lesson and doubling down on what already didn’t work.

  4. I have a friend, who I know only somewhat. He’s a nice guy, and far left, though he can think from time to time. He came up with the following on Facebook late yesterday.

    I’m trying to convey to liberal boomers that younger generations do NOT care as much about having a female president as they do about improving their economic conditions. People are spending upwards of half their income on RENT. Compare that to when you were their age. To what extent is a female president a vanity project? I know this isn’t popular to say and I know sexism is hard to overcome, but identity politics is *chic* politics. It’s avoiding the real issue that corporations have taken over our governance.

    So I don’t think corporations are our country’s primary problem, but they and the uber wealthy do exert a large influence. However, “a vanity project”? “identity politics is chic politics”? Ha!

    His post is a pretty good description of reality over imagology.

  5. Why did they lose? Biden didn’t do a good job in office. Kamala Qué Mala Harris was a dog of a candidate. Poorly run campaign, such as choosing Walz instead of Shapiro; demonizing Trump and his supporters may have preached to the Liberal Choir, but that shopworn tactic didn’t convince many fence-sitters. And so on.

    An anecdote from my polling place. I was third in line when I showed up to vote on Tuesday. By contrast, a friend who voted early stood in line for an hour. There were two wheelchairs in the line, one ahead of me and soon one behind me. The one ahead had a wheelchair with an Army Vet seal on it. His wife was there for assistance. No problem. He instructed his wife to “Vote all Democrat” for him, but that was his right. As it was my right to vote all Republican.

    The wheelchair behind me was occupied by a younger woman who was babbling. The odds of someone who is wheelchair-bound who cannot speak coherently also being able to make coherent voting decisions are rather small odds. (I worked nearly a year as an aide in an institution for the mentally retarded, so I have some experience in making such judgments.) It appeared to me that the person who had brought the wheelchair-bound woman to the voting center had decided to “assist” her with the goal of augmenting a party’s vote. To me, that is a travesty of the voting process.

    It is possible that the wheelchair-bound person wasn’t voting, but I doubt that. Perhaps I should have hung around to test that.

  6. So if creepy Joe thought he would win the election, why step aside? What are Obama and his lapdogs going to do if he says, “No”?

  7. Speaking about voting, exit polls used to have “high school dropout” in the education category. IIRC, it was there in 2008, but not after 2008.

    Which enables Democrats to hide the fact that the high school dropout contingent votes Democrat.

  8. What Obama and his lapdogs would do would be to 25th him. Which is illegitimate. The only legitimate threat of the 25th is to get an incompetent president to resign with grace. Otherwise, either he is fit, or using it is mandatory.

  9. My reading at Slate.com confirms what neo and the commenters above write.
    There are 12 articles “above the fold;” 11 of them are about the election and each blames a different factor for their loss. One article blames the Dems’ support of “genocide,” another claims that Harris ran an excellent campaign in a n impossible situation, still another states that Harris was unprepared and incompetent. One blames ‘Men,” another “White Women.” The opening line of the article pointing out that there are a few glimmers of hope for Dems is “Well, this sucks. The American people have decided to elect a convicted felon over a woman.”

    Nowhere does any author recognize that the Democratic Party is the product, and it’s a terrible one. Nothing produced in a factory that contains both Dearborn and has a quarter of its financing done by Jews is going to be coherent or effective. (In depressing news, Jewish support for Harris remained inexplicably strong- 3 exit pools I found showed that Jewish voting for her was 79, 71 and 66%. Jews are intelligent but not so smart.).

    May the Democratic Party remain as foolhardy as it is today.

  10. One of the Trump examples of genius is the garbage thing. No outrage. He played with it. It was funny. Absolutely meaningless. Not enough weight to get mad at. Garbage memes all over.
    The dems are so whacked-out that even their insults are funny.
    That’s how superior we–the Trump side–are.

  11. Nutz calling Vance “weird” is like Democrats calling Republicans “liars”.
    Or “Biden” calling Trump a “criminal”.

    And then there’s this rather entertaining bit of—Surprise!—Gangster Party crookedness:
    ‘Senior Harris Advisor Deletes X Account As “Massive Scandal” Brews Over $20 Million In Campaign Debt’—
    https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/senior-harris-advisor-deletes-x-account-massive-scandal-brews-over-20-million-campaign-debt

  12. There’s so many factors pointed out above and their drip, drip, drip causing an etching on a rock is mystifying

  13. “Senior Harris Advisor Deletes X Account…”, continued:

    “PLOUFFE GOES POOF! Implosion: Kamala’s Top Campaign Operative Deletes X Account.“—
    https://instapundit.com/683015/

    He’s not the only one, apparently.

    The Bovine Ms. M seems to have had some second thoughts, as well:

    And the Aussie ambassador to the US—no less—has also been erasing hysterically (who does he think he is!!? Bette Midler??)
    https://instapundit.com/682994/

    If he had any sense of honor he’d resign immediately…but these days, who knows…

  14. Re: Maybe the dogs didn’t like it

    Back in the Neolithic (early 1990s) when Microsoft was developing the Windows NT operating system, they decided, as part of the development process, that all teams working on Windows NT would have to use the latest in-house Windows NT as their platform for their daily work.

    Thus these MS employees suffered all the bugs and problems in Windows NT. Which gave everyone a reason to get the damn bugs fixed ASAP.

    Microsoft called this process “Eating your own dog food.” It now has its own wiki entry:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_your_own_dog_food

  15. re: “And yes, books will be written about it – although not by me.”

    There is a wealth of information about events in blogs and on-line commentary, most of which is ephemera and will be, at the very least, difficult for future historians to reference. Much like letters in the past, but, in a strange sense, both concentrated and diffuse.

  16. @neo, jvermeer:25th amendment

    The 25th, by design, is harder to execute than impeachment and it cannot be used against a living, compos mentis President.

    Biden would have simply declared himself competent and two thirds of Congress would then be needed to force him out. The mere attempt would have done far more damage to the Dems than anything Trump could do, even if it could possibly have succeeded (why would the Republicans go along)? If that was a threat, it was an empty one.

    I’m sure there was some leverage used, but it could not have been that lever.

    …when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

  17. DEMs didn’t have a deep bench after Bill Clinton to run against the REPs. Barack Obama had been groomed for decades by American communists—Frank Marshall Davis headed the list, with Bill Ayers arriving later.

    Communists got the unknown BO to the 2004 Democratic National Convention – enter The Speech – followed by the ‘oohs and aahs’ that had previously been reserved for Bill ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton.

    Hillary patiently waited on the bench until it was her turn. Once up, she to was welcomed by the ‘oohs and aahs’, but those were mainly coming from the MSM section – not the resounding oohs and aahs from the Voter sections that Bill & Barack had gotten.

    Hillary ended up losing to Trump, and her backup on the bench had been Biden. Not an ‘ooh and aah’ type of candidate the DEMs had grown used to. Biden was more of a hold up the dog biscuit and watch the dogs all leap around in excitement ‘n glee.

    Biden beat Trump, and the DEMs had resolved both the bench issue & the ‘ooh and aah’ issue – with a dog biscuit type of candidate.

    Well, issues were resolved until brain-dead Biden’s falling, freezing, and muttering issues could not longer be hidden and/or explained away by DEMs and their MSM.

    DEMs went into panic mode. Looked at bench—PANIC!

    After some serious panicking time – DEMs settle on Kamala Harris. No real ‘oohs and aahs’ happened. Not even a dog biscuit seemed to work, which was unusual for the MSM pack.

    Conclusion

    Give the DEMs some more time, and eventually they will realize that they had needed to tie a pork chop around Kamala’s neck to get the dogs to ‘Play’ with her…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>