Jewish Democrat and former member of the House endorses Trump
Peter Deutsch, a former Democratic congressman from Florida, endorsed former President Donald Trump on Monday, citing concerns over Israel’s security as the top issue motivating his decision.
“I feel very comfortable today publicly announcing that I’m endorsing Donald Trump to be reelected as president and I’m planning on voting for him on Nov. 5,” Deutsch said during a press call hosted by the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee to commemorate Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks.
Deutsch, who splits his time between Israel and Florida and served in Congress from 1993 to 2005, expressed particular approval of Trump’s hard-line approach to Iran, including recent remarks in which the former president rebutted President Joe Biden in saying Israel should strike the country’s nuclear facilities.
By contrast, he argued, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have pursued policies that have emboldened Iran even after its ballistic missile strike on Israel last week.
“Their policies towards Iran make the world a dramatically less safe place,” Deutsch, who is Jewish, said in his brief remarks during the call. “It’s not just about what is happening in the Middle East. It’s literally about the homeland. It’s about Israel. Iran, their enemy is not just Israel — their enemy remains the United States. They still want to destroy the United States.”
Seems like a reasonable position to me on the part of Deutsch. I doubt he’s alone, either. But he is no longer in office, and so he’s free to depart from the party line with no loss of assistance from those in the party who decide where the money and other support will be going.
Then again, it might be a good idea for him to hire an excellent lawyer. There is the cautionary tale of Mayor Adams of New York, who strayed from the party line. I’m pretty much in agreement with Barnes in this video on the arrest of Adams, such is my cynicism these days:
YouTube is giving me the “sign in to prove you’re not a bot” message again, and I’ve seen it other places, Neo, so I don’t think it’s your coding that’s doing it.
It’s clear to anyone looking objectively that challenging the progressive party line can come with “Justice” repercussions. Not that Adams didn’t do what he’s charged with; I don’t know; but why the charges now?
Kim Strassel, WSJ podcast interviews Mike Doran on and about the anniversary of Oct. 7th, the Obama-Biden foreign policy, KamalaHuakTuah2024 prospects, Trump prospects, alternatives, and so on. Transcript and audio both available the link: https://www.wsj.com/podcasts/opinion-potomac-watch/all-things-with-kim-strassel-oct-7-one-year-later/d11dfcb5-8570-4254-b33d-7a6eb880efc2
A quote to the point:
Kamala Harris throwing shade on Bibi Netanyahu — right. A weak reed doesn’t throw much shade. And comma-la is the very definition of a weak reed.
Kate
If you don’t challenge the progressive narrative, you are street legal. If you DO challenge any part of the progressive narrative, you are no longer street legal. Recall what Beria, who was Stalin’s secret police (MVD?) chief 1938-53, said: “Find the man, and I’ll find the crime.”