Kamala Harris wants to present herself as a defender of gun rights
However, this has now surfaced. It’s from 2007, when Harris was the DA in San Francisco:
“Just because you LEGALLY possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible.”
This is rather consistent with how Harris viewed various rights as CA AG.
— AG (@AGHamilton29) September 18, 2024
And in fact, San Francisco did enact a gun law – and then-mayor Newsom signed it – that allowed city officials to do exactly that. I don’t know the current status of the law.
Which amendment does such a law violate more, the 2nd or the 4th? I suppose we don’t have to choose between them, but if pressed, I’d say it would be the 4th Amendment with its prohibition against unreasonable searches without probable cause to issue a warrant.
Harris’ instincts appear to be for government overreach and violation of rights. Earlier, I had posted another old video of Harris, this one from the 2020 Democrat debates, which illustrates Harris’ willingness to violate constitutional powers in order to ban guns. Here’s a memory refresher:
MUST WATCH: The last time Kamala ran for President, she told David Muir that she would use executive orders for gun control.
Even Biden was telling her that it wasn't constitutional. She just laughed at him. pic.twitter.com/k2whLMYHzq
— MAZE (@mazemoore) September 11, 2024
Look, she grew up in a middle class Indian family, celebrating Kwanzaa and scrubbing those chitlins for the church, uh, temple, uh, faculty lounge pot luck. She’s simply not going to be taking anyone’s guns!
She and Tampon Tim make Obama seem like a constitutionalist.
I’d like to know what gun she owns and whether she’s ever fired said gun.
She is repulsive.
Kamala’s views have “evolved” during the election campaign to make her more electable, and they will “revolve” back to where they once were if she gets elected.
She is a Democrat and so believes the government and its functionaries know what is best for you, for society, and for them. This is why I have never voted for a Democrat, and likely never will.
“Harris’ instincts appear to be for government overreach and violation of rights.” neo
In order for the left’s utopia to manifest, the transitioning of rights into privileges subject to government revocation is an absolute necessity. Harris’ implication that all rights are subject to ‘amendment’ has the full backing of the democrat party leadership and a majority of its base.
“Hillary Clinton suggests jailing Americans for posting “misinformation”. “There needs to be deterrence”
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1835873305670128099
“A poll released by the University of Chicago via the Chicago Project on Security and Threats offers a chilling account of the growing radicalism in America, particularly after the second foiled assassination attempt of former president Donald Trump, the poll found that 26 million Americans believe “the use of force” is justified to keep Trump from regaining the presidency.”
https://jonathanturley.org/2024/09/17/age-of-rage-26-million-americans-believe-political-violence-is-justified/comment-page-1/
Kamala Harris wants to present herself as a defender of gun rights
And the media will absolutely have her back.
@ steve+walsh: “This is why I have never voted for a Democrat, and likely never will.”
I made that mistake once, when she lied about her intent and support for addressing ways to reduce the national debt.
Maybe never say “never!”, but “likely never” works for me.
She wants to come into our homes to see if we are being “responsible” gun owners? And she says Trump is a threat to democracy. Aaaaarrrrrggghhhhh!!
Kate, I read on another site that Harris had a semiautomatic pistol, maybe a Sig Sauer, when she was a D.A. It said “whatever the San Francisco cops were issued.” I can’t vouch for the truth of that.
I don’t know if she has fired a gun. If not, maybe Dick Cheney could take her quail hunting, to show her how.