Home » Is the ABC whistleblower bona fide?

Comments

Is the ABC whistleblower bona fide? — 15 Comments

  1. The accusation wasn’t that Harris was given the actual questions flat out. The affidavit actually alleged that

    Signature media move: debunk something that wasn’t stated, and then let your surrogates argue that it’s the original statement that’s debunked.

  2. I just do not trust Democrats,any Democrat. And the MSM is FULL of Democrats, all pushing BS at best, tyranny at worst.
    Goebbels would be proud. The MSM is indeed our Ministry of Propaganda.

  3. I believe I also read that the whistleblower also has audio recordings to back up the claim…..maybe just more rumors.

    I would like nothing better than to see ABC bite it, but we will have to wait. The fact they are taking a defensive posture is telling that there maybe some fire with all the smoke. Interesting that the Speaker has not said anything so far.

  4. I agree with a comment from elsewhere…probably at the Professor’s place…
    Let’s dispense with the slow burn – drip drip drip — show your cards, blow your whistle, step in front of a “safe” podcaster’s camera/microphone…own your accusations. Today.

  5. Given the strawman denial I also am inclined to believe the affidavit and whistleblower are authentic. And, if they are, I am not surprised- you really do have to be a moron to not take it as a given that the ABC moderators were going to bend over backwards to help Harris.

  6. This is how this works: if untrue, you follow this down the rabbit hole where they then get to deny the whole thing in its entirety and laugh at you for suggesting such a wild conspiracy theory.
    Just make sure it’s true this time.

  7. Harris’s answers were sounded like messages prepared. It was obvious the 2 ‘ moderators’ were covering Harris who didn’t answer 1 thing truthful

  8. If it wasn’t prepared in advance with the Harris team, the mods did a heck of a job with only their own preparation and efforts.
    Just came natural.
    Which is worse?

    Since, if true, the Harris team knew they didn’t have to bestir themselves.

  9. I believe the whistleblower made sure to go out of their way to assure the public in their affidavit that they were “just like any other reasonable person” and hated Trump.

  10. .” Davis and Muir are either so abysmally ignorant….”

    During a recent interview, Bill Maher actually believed, and stated, that five police died on Jan6. The interviewer convinced him that was not true, and Maher was genuinely surprised. That was amazingly ignorant of what has been known for years to be the truth.

    Naturally, his reaction to this startling revelation was, basically, “oh. well, doesn’t matter, it was still an insurection”.

  11. like otter and bluto, well they didn’t loot the food king, i mean the waterbuffalo guy, chansley could well have had been delta house pledge or pcu, the update a generation later,

    I have resented Maher for his many many idiocies, that he has exhibited through the years too much hash and coke at the Playboy mansions have rotted his brain,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>