Home » The ghouls of Gaza

Comments

The ghouls of Gaza — 26 Comments

  1. Yes, it does.
    As for the Gazans and their (usually false) tales of woe, I am certain that there are winsome children, happy housewives and hard-working men among them all. But so were there among the citizens of Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany and I am rather sorry for those innocents … but we just could not let Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany endure.
    Neither can Israel let Gaza endure, as long as they are ruled by Hamas. Sorry – but that’s war. And Japan and Germany chose war, just as Hamas and the Gazans did.

  2. Sgt. Mom:

    I am convinced that many people in the west today do not understand the harsh realities of war and know little to nothing of history.

  3. I found myself relieved these unfortunate people had already been killed on October 7.

    Then I felt horrified by my relief.

  4. huxley:

    Why horrified? Since they are known to be dead, it’s best they didn’t undergo a long period of suffering. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with not wishing them to have suffered for months and months prior to dying.

  5. Why horrified?

    neo:

    I understand your reasoning, of course.

    However, some of the still-living hostages were eventually released. Had these bodies been alive, they might have been among them.

    How does one balance suffering versus the possibility of surviving? There’s no good answer to that.

    Hamas delenda est.

  6. it is a gruesome thing, to keep bodies, months later, no matter how cool the surrounding are, now I am given to understand the weather does drop considerably in the Winter months, as they do in the West,

    there are also the djinn, who are less like barbara eden, and more like succubi or vampires,

  7. I am so angry at these young people that just won’t believe what really happened, and still happening. Was I so easily led when I was that young? I just don’t know.

  8. huxley:

    Yes, but the last ones released were released in November. Some people believe they are now all dead, in which case better not to have suffered all those months. I don’t know.

    Of course, I hope they are alive but I don’t think there will be any more deals with Hamas to release them. They are either going to live as captives and slaves, suffering, or they are dead or will die soon, or the IDF will find them eventually.

    It is horrific.

  9. SHIREHOME

    Recalling my college years going on sixty years ago. There were some who could be led because they needed to believe and what it was didn’t matter much. Just as long as it put them in the wise and just minority and made our society look terrible. Facts didn’t matter.
    Others may have had more facts but considered some more important and others less, in a kind of reverse of conventional thinking.

    But I think the crop you’re referring to know what happened, are glad it happened but know they can’t afford to admit it to the general public. So their insistence–which is lies about what they think and believe–makes them look really, really odd. But not as odd as if their mental and emotional reality were generally admitted.

    Went to a softball tournament today, grand daughter playing. Four diamonds busy from about eight in the morning to six or theireabouts.
    All girls from age eleven to maybe fourteen, depending on class.

    Thinking what a fat target for somebody who wants to show up and start spraying. And how the Kids in the encampments couldn’t be bothered to say a word amiss.

  10. Gaza has been transformed into a Death Cult since Hamas took complete, undisputed control in 2006. I’ve seen video of kindergarteners playing Hamas and the Jews where the little children playing Hamas act out shooting dead the little children playing Jews. Gazans are refusing to evacuate when requested by IDF saying they would rather die. There’s plenty of evidence they have become a Death Cult. No other Muslim country will accept them. This was never going to turn out well but it was hoped to end at some point

  11. Plenty of psychopathology to go around…
    “Anti-Zionism forced us to withdraw from Reconstructionist Rabbinical College;
    “RRC fosters a culture of intimidation that dissuades students from expressing any positive connection to Israel”—
    https://forward.com/opinion/614347/anti-zionism-reconstructionist-rrc-rabbis/

    October 7 and its aftermath is shaping up to be, among many other things, a HUGE inflection point in Jewish history…

    (But then one could say the same about the general support, among Jews, for “Biden”, et al….and concomitant DEMONIZATION of DJT.)

  12. The Crown Ghouls….
    Dissecting the forces of destruction facing the West, who have decided, tactically, to “Pick…, freeze…, personalize…, and polarize…” the Jewish State as the PRIMARY (because easiest?) target.
    (Trigger warning: It ain’t pretty.)
    “Professional, ideological, and even familial ties connect American institutions in a web of leftist influence.”
    https://americanmind.org/salvo/networks-of-malignity/

  13. It predates Hamas. Do an image search for the June 12, 1970 issue of Life magazine. A bunch of 6 y.o. holding Kalashnikovs, just as big as they are. Labeled as “Palestinian Arabs.”

    The Gaza Arabs must learn that they lost this war and they cannot beat Israel. The same lesson Germany and Japan learned in 1945.

  14. Islam itself is a murderous death cult.

    As for “It continues to astound and depress me. . . .” It enrages me.

  15. Pingback:Instapundit » Blog Archive » NEO: The Ghouls of Gaza. The article also adds this detail about Shani Louk – and perhaps it is t

  16. well it does go back at least to 1920, and Nebi Musa, of course the eradication of Jewish settlements goes back to the 8th century in the Khaybar region,

  17. America’s Democrat Party and Britain’s Labour Party are advocates for and parties to this Ham-a$$ barbarity.

  18. “It continues to astound and depress me that so many people around the world either deny these horrors or excuse them”

    It is worse than that. They celebrate the horrific atrocities committed by Hamas.

  19. UCLA cancelled, at the last minute, a speech explaining the truth about Gaza and “Palestine” by an expert. Then an official from UCLA lied about it. Maybe it’s time for lawsuits.

  20. As for the harsh realities of war?

    The U.S. has a population of about 335 million persons.

    Had a comparable attack, with proportionate deaths, wounded, and captives been carried out against the U.S., the results would have been something like:
    26,000 civilians dead on the first day, often butchered in horrific ways;
    12,800 soldiers and police slain in defending against the attack;
    115,600 persons wounded during the attack; and,
    around 8,500 persons kidnapped (and then murdered, sexually-assaulted, etc.).

    What would we have done, faced with such an outrage?

    Had this happened, I think a majority of Americans would have advocated the use of nuclear weapons against the nation which launched the attack, especially if they discovered that 80%+ of the population of the aggressor nation enthusiastically supported and celebrated the attack, and that there was no hint of any popular uprising opposing the regime which orchestrated the attack.

    If the U.S. didn’t nuke the aggressor, I don’t think it would be for reasons of believing a nuclear response disproportionate to the offense. I think it would be for fear of long-term environmental and geopolitical consequences.

    I don’t even think it would be on account of the unintended-but-foreseeable deaths of innocent persons.

    It is certainly true that, when one scourges evil from a geographic region by fire, the result will sadly be the deaths of some number of persons, however scant, who were horrified by that evil and played no part in it.

    That said, were it not for outrage from the world-at-large and the temporary loss of decades’ improved relations with the Saudis, Jordanians, Egyptians, etc., the total incineration of Gaza would seemingly have been net-beneficial even after the sadly-unavoidable loss of those innocents. Quite beneficial, in fact. Beneficial far beyond the mere standards of proportionality.

    Anyway, as it is, Gaza is too close to the rest of Israel for nukes. And the likely international backlash of a Dresden-style conventional firebombing — which is also more-expensive and takes longer — makes it a bad option. (Which is to say: The other countries of the world are too hypocritical to acknowledge that, were they in Israel’s place, they’d have given Gaza the Dresden treatment, slept well, had a large breakfast the next morning, and celebrated no longer having to worry about diverting any portion of their limited water resources to that region.)

    Still, I think it’s instructive to put the attack in terms of what it would have been, if the U.S. were in Israel’s shoes.

    Certainly that’s the least-hypocritical perspective to ponder, if we those de-facto Iranian assets in the Biden Administration are going to presume to lecture Israel about how they should deal with Gaza.

    And it is the most-realistic perspective — I would say, the normative perspective — from which to evaluate the hilarious contention that Israel’s actions towards Gaza show even a whisker of genocidal intent. If Gaza doesn’t look like Dresden Aflame right now as we speak, and if the whole area hadn’t been converted to a single massive trinitite by the last seconds of October 8, then there’s better evidence that the IDF is full of hippie flower children, than that it harbors persons with genocidal intent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>