House GOP election security guidelines bill
The House has come up with a model bill for states to follow in order to secure their elections. It’s a good effort, I think. But it’s the sort of thing that only will be passed in states with GOP legislatures, GOP governors, and conservative judges who won’t overturn it when it’s challenged in the courts by the left.
Here are some excerpts from the bill:
Titled, “The Uniform State American Confidence in Elections (ACE) Act,” the legislative tool kit provides 13 recommended state laws “to increase voters’ confidence and promote election integrity.” Many of the policies are modeled after the ACE Act, a federal measure containing similar provisions that House Republicans introduced last year. The bill was passed by the Committee on House Administration in July and is awaiting a full House floor vote.
Included in the Uniform State ACE Act are policies long-supported by election integrity activists, including voter ID and proof of residency requirements for individuals voting in person or by mail. Despite Democrats’ claims that ID requirements suppress non-white voters, the vast majority of U.S. voters — including those who are black and Hispanic — support such election safeguards. Several courts have also recently shot down Democrat-backed lawsuits alleging voter-ID laws “suppress” voters.
Another policy suggested is a mandate to regularly remove ineligible voters from state voter rolls. This would include removing any non-citizens on the list. …
Also included in the Uniform State ACE Act is a recommendation that states prohibit private funding of elections [such as “Zuckbucks”].
These things should be no-brainers for states to pass. They are simply obvious basic safeguards. But as I said, only GOP-controlled states will pass them, and the control has to be solid.
You may recall that, the next time the Democrats get control of the federal government, they are planning to pass HR1 or its equivalent, a federal uniform voting act that will make it impossible for states to employ these safeguards of voting security. This is an enormously important part of the Democrats’ platform, one of which many people are unaware. If the Democrats win both houses of Congress and the presidency, many more people will become aware, but it will probably be too late.
Source dated January 12th — THANKS neo for bring an overlooked story proper attention!
Wasn’t removal of inactive voters part of the Motor Voter under Slick Willie? And Dem states refused to comply?
These should be no-brainers, but Democrats will fight it tooth and nail.
“If the Democrats win both houses of Congress and the presidency, many more people will become aware, but it will probably be too late.”
If too late, it will only be too late for peaceful remedies… For the only choice then will be between ‘life’ on our knees or once again watering the Tree of Liberty with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
To paraphrase JFK; ‘those who make peaceful redress of grievance impossible, make violent redress of grievance inevitable.’
“Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and their freedoms” Robert A. Heinlein
States are already ignoring federal laws when they consider it expedient; for example, drug laws and immigration in “sanctuary” cities and states. What legions will the federal government bring to force North Carolina to ignore its own election laws, which are consistent with this proposed bill?
no motor voter was about padding the voter roles, overwhelming the system,
@ Kate > “These should be no-brainers, but Democrats will fight it tooth and nail.”
If no brain is required, you would think most of the Democrats would be on board!
no motor voter was about padding the voter roles, overwhelming the system,
We were still living in CA when the legislature pasdsed “Motor Voter” which as much as legalized illegals voting. My wife’s birthday is in January. She called DMV for an appointment to renew her drivers’ license. She was told the earliet would be in April. The DMV was flooded with illegals.
Mike K, I live in CA and recently renewed my DL. I was able to get an appointment in about two weeks though I had to “shop” for a DMV office a little further away to get the time I wanted. The worst was before that I went through a maddening “online” process that was supposed to streamline things. At least the actual visit was mercifully brief, starting close to the appointment time.
Also in CA they *automatically* invite you to register to vote when you renew your license, it is insane since they issue licenses to illegals. They claim they screen for citizenship but yeah right.