↓
 
Home » I suppose you’ve heard …

I suppose you’ve heard …

The New Neo Posted on by

… about this:

The U.S. Senate staffer who filmed himself having sex with his boyfriend inside a Capitol Building meeting room has been fired. That news was delivered in a statement put out by Sen. Ben Cardin’s office, the Democrat who employed the staffer.

As RedState reported, the saga first came to light on Friday afternoon, with the only real details being that the staffer was a member of Cardin’s office. Shortly after, the staffer was identified as Aidan Maese-Czeropski, and the video he produced was obtained and publicized. I won’t go into detail describing it except to say it was the hardcore variety.

Cardin’s announcement that Maese-Czeropski was fired could not been less informative.

More here. And here’s a post in which John Hinderaker goes into Maese-Czeropski’s sort-of-denial.

Apparently this incident hasn’t been covered much if at all in the MSM. I’m not inclined to say much about it either, although probably for different reasons. My reason is that it gives me a sense of exhaustion. These days, I find that many stories that are the sensation du jour fill me with that same feeling.

This story puts me in mind of that old saying variously attributed to many different well-known people: “I don’t care what anybody does, so long as they don’t do it in the street and frighten the horses.” Posting this video online is the equivalent, I suppose, of “doing it in the street.” As for horses, I don’t think they’re watching the internet, nor are they in Congress. Yet.

Comments

I suppose you’ve heard … — 43 Comments

  3. Putting the video on a public Twitter feed means he thought there would be no consequences, and that’s what makes me tired. I don’t know why people make sex videos to begin with, and I don’t know why they put them on the internet — except for Kim Kardashian, who did it for money.

  5. I don’t care what anybody does, so long as they don’t do it in the street and frighten the horses.

    I’ve never heard that one before. It does remind me of an episode of the old HBO series Deadwood, loosely based on the actual early history of the town in South Dakota. Loved that show.

    It was quite dark, with many dark characters, though in this episode, one of the nicer characters takes delivery of a new penny farthing bicycle which he tries out on the rough dirt streets in town. Being an ungainly bicycle, he loses control, almost collides with some horses which then bolt. The terrified horses then kill a small child in the street. The town is then in an uproar. As I said, a dark series.

    As to the topic at hand, nowadays I automatically think, “Misdirection??”

  6. What was the point of all this?

    What was this guy thinking was going to happen when he basically said a great big video “F you” to his Congressman boss, to the Senate, the Congress, to American history and tradition, to the American people, and, in fact, via Twitter, to the world?

    His initial reported defense was to play the victim, and to say that the was only being persecuted because of “who he loved.”

    Was he really so delusional as to think that–given the magnitude of what he did–that excuse was ever going to fly?

    His parents must be so proud.

    The supposed product of the best schools, he’s just demolished any future career.

    Because even some Lefty and/or gay organization which might consider hiring him would have to worry that–given his apparently total lack of judgment and self control–he might pull some even worse very public stunt while in their employ and, this time, take them down with him.

  7. TommyJay–That certainly is some kind of “misdirection.”

    However, it’s only an effective misdirection if it’s widely reported in the MSM and, so far, given that he worked for a Democrat Senator, it appears that the MSM–ever protective of Democrats–so far doesn’t want to report that this bizarre and bat shit crazy event even happened.

  8. he’s also a zombie hamas fanboi, who would get stoned properly, not metaphorically, if the Hamas got their,

  10. Every Congressional Democrat and most Republicans would agree, at least privately, that it’s not what he did but where he did it. That point of view logically applies to Bill Clinton’s depravity in the Oval Office.

  12. Is the “boyfriend” an employee working at the Capitol? If so, who is he and what’s his employment status? If not, who let him in?

  13. well you have the luggage snatcher, miss cabbage patch, the whoville on coke dancers, a sargasso of sewage,

  14. when john adams said this nation this constitution, was only meant for a moral people, he wasn’t spitballing there,

  16. “…an aide to Democrat Senator Ben Cardin, filmed himself having anal sex in the Hart Senate Office Building hearing room…”

    Apparently he’s no longer an aide. Also, apparently the problem for the aide isn’t his actions, but rather where he filmed himself taking part in those actions.
    If the immorality of such actions isn’t the issue, what is?

  20. Is Incitatus in the Senate chamber? Neigh! Not yet. But they sure are horsing around while the country burns.

  22. Would guess like every place and building anyone who can knows exactly who was involved, but those who can are Leftists and so will smother any information they know to protect any they can.

  24. Skip, you mean those who have been canned?
    Except in Singapore I gather he/they would have been caned?
    Oh, and in Iran they would have been “craned”.

  28. What was this man’s point and goal in stripping down and filming himself being subjected to anal sex where his boss(es) work?

    Edit: Supposedly this guy participated in Pride Parades where he wore a similar “costume” featured in the anal sex video.

  30. Indeed, the Corrupt Media(TM) can file this under “Mostly Decent”…
    (And/or “Republicans Pounce”…)

  33. om…no please no.
    Those two, along with all the rest, can keep their clothes on while in public viewing.

  38. Maese-Czeropski was a recent Berkeley grad. Not that it really matters. Every college campus and at least half the country is now Berkeley.

    Maese-Czeropski complains that people who disagree with him politically are attacking him for who he loves. But was this really love?

    There was some discussion after the gay mariage decision about whether homosexuals would become bourgeois and mainstream. There was something to be said for that — the real gender rebels became “trans” — but things like this make one wonder. Probably, it has something to do with age, as well as sexual orientation.

    Aidan Maese-Czeropski posed with Biden (and Trump) and even appeared in a Biden ad. Live by the camera — die by the camera. But Aidan is already doing damage control online. He will probably land on his feet somewhere.

  40. So it was allegedly a German student, miguel? Why such a person in a Senate hearing room? Stupid all around.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

↑