Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson: quite a contrast
As part of the recent SCOTUS affirmative action decision, Clarence Thomas took special care to offer a critique of Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in the case. Here’s what he had to say on the matter.
I find it particularly interesting to look at the backgrounds of Thomas and Brown Jackson, the two black justices who are on very opposite sides of this issue. Who had the privilege and who didn’t? Who was more oppressed? Compare and contrast.
Clarence Thomas is 75, and was born under segregation in the deep South. Brown Jackson is 52 and was born in unsegregated DC and grew up in unsegregated Florida. But that’s just the beginning.
From Clarence Thomas’ Wiki profile [emphasis mine].
Thomas was born on June 23, 1948, in Pin Point, Georgia. Pin Point was a small, predominantly black community near Savannah founded by freedmen after the Civil War. He was the second of three children born to M. C. Thomas, a farm worker, and Leola “Pigeon” Williams, a domestic worker. They were descendants of enslaved people and spoke Gullah as a first language. Thomas’s earliest known ancestors were slaves named Sandy and Peggy, who were born in the late 18th century and owned by wealthy planter Josiah Wilson of Liberty County, Georgia.
Thomas’s father left the family when Thomas was two years old. Though Thomas’s mother worked long hours, she was sometimes paid only pennies per day, struggled to earn enough money to feed the family, and was forced to rely on charity. After a house fire left them homeless, Thomas and his younger brother, Myers, were taken to live in Savannah with his maternal grandparents, Myers and Christine Anderson.
Thomas experienced amenities such as indoor plumbing and regular meals for the first time while staying in Savannah. Myers Anderson had little formal education but built a thriving fuel oil business that also sold ice. Thomas has called Anderson “the greatest man I have ever known”. When Thomas was ten years old, Anderson started taking the family to help at a farm every day from sunrise to sunset. He believed in hard work and self-reliance, and counseled Thomas to “never let the sun catch you in bed”. He also impressed upon his grandsons the importance of a good education.
More can be found here on Thomas’ background experiences. His mother was eighteen when he was born, and they lived in “a one-room wooden house near the marshes. It had dirt floors and no plumbing or electricity” [emphasis mine]:
A devout Catholic who created his own fuel oil business in Savannah in the 1950s, [Thomas’ grandfather] provided the example of self-motivation in the face of segregation that would inspire his grandson. Through hard work and a refusal to submit to the poverty and degradation of menial work, he “did for himself,” as one of his favorite expressions went. He fed and cared for Clarence and Peanut and paid for their education at St. Benedict the Moor; at this all-black grammar school, white nuns exercised firm discipline. The racist vigilante group known as the Ku Klux Klan often threatened the nuns, who rode on the backs of buses with their students and demanded hard work and promptly completed assignments.
It’s not hard to imagine why Thomas is offended at the idea that a legacy of slavery hampers every single black student today, when they have so much much less of that to contend with than he did.
Clarence’s grandfather took him to a meeting of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), of which Anderson was a member, and read the boy’s grades aloud…
Clarence’s favorite retreat was a blacks-only library in Savannah—the Savannah public library was for whites—funded by the Carnegie family. His browsing there helped to formulate his ambition: He would one day have the sophistication to understand magazines like the New Yorker.
Remember that Thomas’ first language was Gullah.
More:
In his memoir, “My Grandfather’s Son,” Thomas says he felt “tricked” by paternalistic Whites at Yale who recruited Black students.
“After graduating from Yale, I met a black alumnus of the University of Michigan Law School who told me that he’d made a point of not mentioning his race on his application. I wished with all my heart that I’d done the same,” he wrote.
“I learned the hard way that a law degree from Yale meant one thing for White graduates and another for blacks, no matter how much anyone denied it,” Thomas wrote. “As a symbol of my disillusionment, I peeled a fifteen-cent price sticker off a package of cigars and stuck it on the frame of my law degree to remind myself of the mistake I’d made by going to Yale.”
Thomas’ hardship story is a contrast to Brown Jackson, whose story is rather different, to say the least:
Johnny and Ellery Brown, Jackson’s parents, have been married for 54 years.
Intact family.
Both Miami natives, [Brown Jackson’s parents] were raised in the Jim Crow South, attended segregated primary schools, before graduating from historically Black colleges and universities, according to her White House biography. They settled in DC and both worked as public school teachers.
So it’s actually Brown Jackson’s parents who are of Clarence Thomas’ raised-in-segregation generation (although perhaps not so poverty-striken as Thomas’ rather extreme situation), and they became teachers. Then her father went to law school.
“My parents taught me that, unlike the many barriers that they had had to face growing up, my path was clearer, such that if I worked hard and believed in myself, in America I could do anything or be anything I wanted to be.”
I guess her parents were of similar mindset about that as Clarence Thomas, since this quote resembles his philosophy. This seems to run counter to Brown Jackson’s dissent in the Harvard case.
Also:
Jackson credited her interest in law to her father, recalling in her opening remarks, “My very earliest memories are of watching my father study – he had his stack of law books on the kitchen table while I sat across from him with my stack of coloring books.”
Once again, a very different atmosphere and upbringing to that of Clarence Thomas. Her brother is a lawyer, too.
For decades I’ve seen and read so many criticisms of Clarence Thomas from the left, most of them quite vicious. And yet his story would be legendary – if only he were a Democrat rather than a conservative.
The great and the ingrate.
Someone put up a graph of words spoken by each of the current justices in their first 8 oral arguments. KBJ lapped the field by thousands. The next contenders were the other three women by a very large margin. The five men spoke much less, and Thomas didn’t even hit the 100 mark IIRC.
If I remember correctly, the hosts on The View described South Carolina U.S. Senator Tim Scott as an “exception.” Those same folks would call Clarence Thomas an exception, and Ketanji BrownJackson an exception, too. Not to mention, Jackson’s own parents. And, of course, there is Mr. and Mrs. Obama. And, the over 300 million dollar black NBA players. And, the over 80 black rappers with net worths from $10 million to over a $1 billion (see, https://www.therichest.com/top-lists/top-100-richest-rappers/). And the 13 black mayors of the USA’s 50 largest cities (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mayors_of_the_50_largest_cities_in_the_United_States). And, top neurosurgeon Ben Carson.
Sooooo many exceptions.
Just what racism, exactly, is grifter Kentanji Brown Jackson (the wife of a surgeon) complaining about?
We all do the best we can.
She can’t even define what a woman is.
(Not even the multitudes of what a woman can be…)
Give ‘er a break.
Yep, we all do the best we can…
I’m not going to try to pretend I experienced anything like Clarence Thomas. But if you’re white and want to feel discrimination go to Asia. I won’t use the language that’s running through my head. Let’s just say they weren’t inclined to respect me. I forced the issue
Jason Riley wrote a fascinating opinion piece that was published in The Wall Street Journal on Monday: “Who Says Justice Thomas Benefited from Affirmative Action?” In short, justice Thomas graduated from Holy Cross as #9 in his class and may well have been admitted to Yale Law on his merits.
I think it would be super-duper interesting if both Justice Thomas and former president Barrack Obama each waived privacy and authorized the publication of their undergraduate and law school admissions files and transcripts. Perhaps we could understand where merit fit into each man’s career.
I’m amazed at how uninterested the mainstream press seems to be in pursuing Obama’s academic record–they were sure interested in George Bush’s record until it ended up being comparable with John Kerrey’s. While what one does after school is far more important than a credential obtained in the first third of one’s life, basic fairness would require that either all politicians be placed under a microscope or none of them being subject to investigation.
There was a post on Thomas on Powerline blog (IIRC), where Thomas stated that he ultimately very much regretted having gone to Yale.
+ Bonus:
Turley hits another one out of the park during this All-Star break….
“Biden’s ‘Orwellian Ministry of Truth’: Court Finds a ‘Massive Attack’ on Free Speech in Government Censorship Efforts”—
https://jonathanturley.org/2023/07/06/bidens-orwellian-ministry-of-truth-federal-judge-finds-a-massive-attack-on-free-speech-in-government-censorship-efforts/
Opening graf:
‘ “The most massive attack against free speech in United States history.” Those words by Chief U.S. District Judge Terry A. Doughty are part of a 155-page opinion granting a temporary injunction, requested by Louisiana and Missouri, to prevent White House officials from meeting with tech companies about social media censorship….’
And (not quite finished)…apparently, President Fentanyl’s not in it only for the Fentanyl! (Or the Tranq…)
” ‘America’s Darkest Secret’: Sex Trafficking, Child Abuse and the Biden Administration”—
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/19780/sex-trafficking-child-abuse-biden-administration
Presenting…President Child-Abuse!
(But I keep forgetting: The sieve-like border is the Republicans’ fault…)
The recent SCOTUS case (Harvard/UNC) was graced with a concurrence by Clarence Thomas which has been compressed into a 15-point condensation and is worthy of framing and putting on the wall. A joy to read, and leaves Ketanji Brown Jackson in the intellectual dust.
Go ye and read of it.
https://thefederalist.com/2023/06/30/the-15-best-zingers-maxims-and-mic-drops-from-clarence-thomas-harvard-concurrence/
Lefties made a huge error in removing Breyer from SCOTUS. After RBG died he was the only Lefty who could make a decent legal argument. Once he was gone and all the Lefties had was Kagan, Sotomayor and Brown, their affirmative action deficiencies became painfully obvious.
KBJ probably spent more time in her coloring books than in her law books while pursuing her JD.
“Lefties made a huge error in removing Breyer from SCOTUS. After RBG died he was the only Lefty who could make a decent legal argument. Once he was gone and all the Lefties had was Kagan, Sotomayor and Brown, their affirmative action deficiencies became painfully obvious.”
KBJ’s elevation makes it clear that the left doesn’t care about logical arguments. If they say it, then it must be true. How it’s true is irrelevant. The proof is KBJ herself, a woman who doesn’t even know where the rights outlined in the Bill of Rights derive from. And yet the Dems picked her for a seat in the top court of the land. Sure, she was a diversity pick. Biden said so himself before she was named. But I find it hard to believe that the Dems couldn’t find at least one black woman with a legal background who’s smarter than she is.
I was shocked at how thoroughly and specifically Thomas demolished KBJ’s opinion.
It struck me as a public spanking, albeit well-deserved. To an objective observer KBJ, I say, was humiliated.
To legal eagles here, I ask, have there been similarly devastating responses at the SC level?