Home » Behold, some of the January 6th “insurrection” surveillance video

Comments

Behold, some of the January 6th “insurrection” surveillance video — 18 Comments

  1. Should be “taking photos “, I think.

    Prosecutors who have filed charges of trespass and such should be required to explain themselves with regard to each and every case.

  2. This is how it was easy to know that no one was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher. If that had happened they would have shown the video all day every day for at least a month.

    They are hiding the rest of this because if you could look at it all you would know that this was a very small event.

  3. Notice the full on Antifa guy in the helmet and gas mask trying to direct traffic. At about 23 seconds it looks like he’s talking to someone via a radio (?) in his left mask filter. No one casually arrives at a large demonstration without expecting serious violence. The only other people who are covered are a bunch of people with face scarves.

  4. The videos reveal what we expected, and not what the MSM portrayed and what most of the Woke/Liberal crowd believes.

    But, the release of these videos is safe now. The narrative has already been firmly established. The people that actually need to see them never will. Even if they are forced to watch, they won’t accept new evidence. The narrative has already been imprinted. Any information that conflicts will be rejected as false.

    Once the “Big Lie” has been instilled, no amount of truth will ever undo it. That is why it is now okay for them to release this footage. They know that it is too late for it to make a difference.

  5. “Any information that conflicts will be rejected as false.”

    Yes, that is the scary thing.

    And yet it’s not entirely true.
    The Germans had their Red-Army-at-the-gates-of-Berlin moment (i.e., wakeup; though to be fair, quite a few Germans—especially in Berlin—had already “woken up” quite a bit before that).
    The Japanese had Nagasaki (apparently Hiroshima alone didn’t quite do the trick).

    One shudders to ponder what horrors might make the deluded “Biden” “faithful” see the light of day….

  6. OMG, the violence! Might be, almost has to be the most peaceful “insurrection” in history… what a dissapointment it must be for the left. Yet democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) have knowingly and repeatedly lied and imprisoned those seeking redress of grievance. May they get what’s coming to them in full.

  7. A peaceful assembly derided, voices denied.

    An executive offer to conduct crowd control rejected.

    A riot (“disorder”) forced with an invitation extended, summarily withdrawn, and a Whitmer Closet event, another.

    A “hero”, a novel apology for self-defense, an unarmed woman in a prone position murdered.

    A handmade tale spun, brayed, again, to mold a sustainable misperception.

    I suppose that all’s fair in lust and abortion.

  8. The videos below the initial one on the Zoe Tillman link provided show significantly more violence. None of them are very long, and likely don’t show the full context, but some show what appears to be a handful of people who are definitely being violent.

    Not that that bothers me, mind you. I think politicians should have a little fear of the populace, and this went a long way toward injecting that dynamic back into the realm of governance.

  9. Might be, almost has to be the most peaceful “insurrection” in history

    The violence was plausible, believable, a “burden”, a sustainable handmade tale in the 3rd, now the 4th trimester.

  10. “The videos below the initial one on the Zoe Tillman link provided show significantly more violence.” gmmay70

    What are you talking about? The very last one only shows one cop striking his baton out a window and that not very vigorously. All the rest are people walking around with a few hyper individuals jumping up and down like they’re high on something.

  11. Watched the longer clip, saw short one couple times elsewhere. Last video towards end looks like smoke or tear gas.
    The government was definitely keeping videos under wraps because it doesn’t show what they claim, and their cohorts who as far as I know are free clear and not being charged.

  12. Not many participants with helmets, gas masks, or backpacks. Vast majority dressed for tourism rather than violence

  13. I’m wondering who selected these clips, and what else is available. If they have 14,000 hours of video, that means the complex has > 1,700 cameras operating. The prosecutors have been claiming it will compromise security to reveal the location of the cameras. What does it matter what their precise location has been? They had cameras everywhere, each one on average covering an arc with a radius of 80 ft. (Only about 4% of the square footage of the Capitol complex is in the Capitol building itself, btw).

    One interpretation I’ve seen of the behavior of Congress and our odious Department of Justice was that the reaction of the Capitol Police to the commotion was to insist those in the Senate chamber take cover, so you had these prima donnas with their face in the carpet; the vain fools want revenge for that.

    You realize the DC bench has been complicit with Brady material being concealed for 8 months. Every judge but that one.

  14. I thought at the time that it was a very bad idea to go into the Capitol under those circumstances. I have read a number of accounts of agents provocateur being seen at the demonstration. The refusal of extra security is another indication that this was a setup.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>